It would delight me if arch TERF JK Rowling were found guilty of some horrific sex crime like Epstein. Or at least if kiddie porn were found on her computer. Sigh
OP glows brighter than the sun with this post.
>>44250506Contrary to the groupthink on this board, not every post you personally dislike was posted by a three-letter agent.
>>44250498wasnt she in the emails or smth
the only thing that keeps this woman relevant is tranny autistic losers who get triggered by her discourse, otherwise shes just some crazy limey winehag tilting at winds
>>44250498Rowling pivoted to TERF politics because people were more widely starting to recognise how crap her writing is. This had a nice double effect: 1) it gave her lots of support from transphobes and even conservatives who’s politics she mostly disagreed with before, 2) it changed the landscape of her critics from primarily those who criticised her for being a shit writer who lowers the standards of literature by existing (like Harold Bloom) to primarily people who criticise her for her political views, drowning out the criticism of her as a writer.
>>44250498Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven i suppose
>>44250498This is weird as hell
>>44250754I was aware of this as I composed the post, yes.
>>44250549yeah she was close friends with epstein and dabbled on occasion
>>44250498JK Rowling is not and never will be an arch TERF, I wasn't a 1960's terf that got reincarnated as a tranny for being a terrible person, just to have pale hollow imitations replace my theoretical and philosophical genius. I'm talk Mary Daly, Janice Raymond, and before she went woke: Dworkin. People like JK Rowling don't fucking believe in anything, it's why she parrots males abusing women when talking about trans women. If she truly believed sexism was reprehensible or should be done away with, she wouldn't weaponize it so gleefully.
>>44250869hence arch terf, not arch radfem or anything elseher political interests begin and end at trannies which is appropriate for a terf
>>44250878nah she's regular terf at best, she doesn't believe in the radical feminism. Arch Terfs were rad fem that distrubuted the SCUM manifesto, JK Rowling could never make a 5 year old amab read the SCUM manifesto, she doesn't have the stomach for that level of anti-male abuse.
>>44250498Imagine being a billionaire hottie having wine all day AND getting to ragebait trannies and progress women's rights. Sounds like the dream
>>44251812Of course she’s a pedophile. Why does this not surprise me?
>>44250566>people were more widely starting to recognise how crap her writing isShe had libtards in a chokehold. Every time Trump did something, they called him Voldemort.
>>44251689Progress how?
>>44252275The poster you’ve replied to is a TERF. They believe that the very existence of trans women harms women’s rights, and therefore that JK Rowling’s efforts to eliminate transsexuals from public life advances women’s rights.
>>44250498>Someone else being evil would "Delight" youAnon that is completely fucked up.
>>44252678You misrepresent my thoughts. It would be seeing her reputation ruined that would delight me.
>>44250498using the phrase "it would delight me" immediately outs you as either a nasty rapehon or a cia agent, whatever the case opinion and thread dismissed
>>44250498>horrific sex crimeSo, something like your entire life? Get this garbage board off the front page.
>>44252935My existence is not a crime, pest.
>>44252901>>44252803>>44250514
>>44252257Sure at the broadest strokes but I remember that ten years ago, as the fantastic beasts movies were first coming out, the opinion from left wing commentators were already starting to shift before she went mask off in like 2019. They were already talking about how she was bad at developing characters properly to reach the end points she wanted, the sentiment was changing from “she’s our girl” to “she’s actually washed” and “I liked this as a kid but it doesn’t hold up”
>>44252935All of this reads as negative stereotypes about gay men, not trans women. Except for the “nobody knows the gender” part which only applies to “queer” afabs.
>>44253337These retards can’t tell the difference.
>>44250869not believing in anything is the best way to do politics these days, keep up boomer. its not like the bullshit janice raymond said ever made any logical sense anyway. so why not throw off the curtain?
>>44253974This is why I prefer Rowling-type TERFs to the old Raymond-type ones
>>44253994its actually baffling how often radical feminists just proved themselves wrong in their own texts when trying to do terfism. like you literally have to lie ti di this shit so refusing to do so was a death knell for their arguments. was so fucking funny.
>>44254016Elaborate on that.
>>44254036in the transsexual empire there was this bit where she tried to prove trannies were stupid by defining sex and then saying it was immutable and she used 7 criteria to define sex and only one of them was actually immutuable (chromosomes) although if you think abt it a bit more, it really doesn't matter if your chromosomal sex is male when your hormonal profile is making your phenotype female and its not like you're even lacking any female genetic material because you have an X chromosome lol. so like, she defined sex as 6 mutuable things and one vestigal aspect, and then said "see you cant change your sex stupid trannies!" it was so funny.
>>44250498It would delight me if this hack's awful shit franchise died forever
>>44250498U can just say u have a cock
>>44254080What motivated reasoning does to a bitch
>>44254080Also, it’s worth mentioning that chromosomes aren’t, like, *inherently* immutable, either; it’s just a technical problemSome day, technologies that can change absolutely every aspect of a person’s sex will be achieved—and then TERFs (supposing that they are still around) continue to deploy the same old specious arguments built on motivated reasoning to deny the material reality of sex change, e. g., “male socialization” or “your sex is determined by your phenotype at birth, so you can never change it, even if you completely overhaul your phenotype later” (while simultaneously maintaining that sex is “material”)
>>44250498she is a great writter and she is right about everything she said about trans people. one single person stand against your pervertion and you people start crying like fucking babies and try to ruin someone life and reputation
The hard thing about TERFs is you're not going to find that. Most of them don't have sex at all.
>>44250869stupid ass cynical coment talking about her like if she was some kind of old saggy woman with not actual political reason beside boomerism. bet you are way smarter than one of the best fiction novelist of the 21th century. i hope you creep in hell
>>44250498Women tend to not be sex criminals, sorry seething anon. She's mad women are being forced (under threat of loss of income/survival) to share space with the population statistically most likely to be sex criminals/woman abusers (males) and got lynched for it and turned turbo evil to stick it to you retards for being incoherent hysterical freaks that missed the point of "forcing women to share space with creepy ass men who say they're women under threat of termination is wrong".
>>44254080You are retarded and delusional misrepresenting things that make you mad. More than just chromosomes are listed as unchangeable features of sex. No troon is growing ovaries, a cervix, a uterus or a real vagina regardless of chromosomes. Comforting yourself that hurdur its only my chromosomes, it doesn't matter! is such a pathetic cope. Having one X chromosome is different than having two as well. Many vital components of female fertility, including ovaries forming at all, will not function with only one X chromosome (IE: Turner's syndrome, 45,X karyotype).
>>44257421You are a million years away from changing your chromosomes, coping faggot. You troons can't even get a real vagina.
>>44258739no, you kill yourself you pedophilic pervert scum
>>44257424you're defending an epstein associate.>>44257465you think harry potter is good fiction
>>44259112>you're defending an epstein associatei dont care>you think harry potter is good fictionyes, i am not the biggest fan but i liked the books and the movies are alrighh
>>44253337That's because the trans moral panic is just the gay moral panic repackaged
>>44257424>great writer>has produced nothing but mediocre detective fiction and YA slop>>44257465>best fiction novelist of the 21st centuryHere’s your pathetic manchild award, grow the fuck up and read some real books. This is the books equivalent of saying the greatest 21st century movies are marvel movies.You wouldn’t even be defending her books if she wasn’t transphobic.
>>44259027womp womp
>>44252666Because it reduces women to social roles and stereotypes. Studies show that y'all have cluster B disorders, have a higher percentage of convicted sex offenders, and male-pattern crime. Sorry for not lying. I would rather be in a changeroom with a cis man than you, lower chace that the cis man is mentally ill
>>44259027>Some trans women get sexually aroused by imagining themselves with female body partsOK, and?
>>44259758I will never take your ideology seriously.
>>44259770Mine is based on science and concrete evidence, yours is on theoretical discussion and theory.
>>44259776False. Your ideology is based exclusively on the desire to eliminate transsexuals from public life at any cost. All of the rhetoric that you employ is built on motivated reasoning, not facts or logic.I could provide reams of peer-reviewed papers that disprove the multiple false claims you’ve made in this thread, but I won’t bother, because you’ll automatically dismiss them, just like you do any evidence that contradicts your narratives. You judge facts based not on whether they are true, but based on whether they advance or hinder your political goal.As for my ideology, it’s just liberalism—which doesn’t make any claims that can be verified or falsified by science, because it’s a political philosophy, not a science or a pseudo-science.
>>44250498>TERFKill yourself trannie. ywnbaw.
>>44259813Sex is real and binary (with rare DSD exceptions). Policy must follow evidence, not self-ID ideology. The claim that sex is "assigned," changeable, and dissent = bigotry, clashes with data. Gender dysphoria is real/distressing with massive comorbidities. Studies show personality disorders in 15-80%+ of clinical trans samples (Cluster B prominent: borderline/narcissistic), far above population norms. Swedish long-term cohort (Dhejne 2011): post-surgery suicide ~19x controls, elevated mortality/psychiatric risks persist. Crime: MtF retain male-pattern criminality. Dhejne: MtFs had 6.6x higher convictions than female controls (similar for violent crime), not different from males. UK prison stats: ~50-60% of transwomen prisoners are sex offenders vs. ~3% of female prisoners. Autogynephilia: Documented paraphilia in many non-homosexual MtF, arousal to self-as-female (Blanchard typology). "OK, and?" ignores its relevance to motivations and women's spaces. Women aren't stereotypes or feelings. Single-sex spaces (changerooms, sports, prisons, shelters) exist due to male physical/sexual dimorphism and crime patterns. Preferring a cis male over a dysphoric male, there is rational risk management. "No risk" studies are often weak/short-term. Liberalism protects rights and evidence, not compelled speech or redefining biology. Compassion: treat comorbidities, therapy-first for youth (per Cass/European shifts), adult gatekeeping, and sex-based protections. Most childhood dysphoria desists. High desistance + weak affirmation evidence undermine "transition or suicide." You frame opposing views as "elimination" while demanding unfalsifiable affirmation. Data favours sex realism over ideology. No one wants to erase dysphoric people, accurate diagnosis and reality-based policy protect everyone.
>>44259758>I would rather be in a changeroom with a cis man than you, lower chace that the cis man is mentally illThis is how I felt when my male roommate trooned out. His risk factor skyrocketed for me, as trooning out meant had become a man obsessed with women's bodies while harboring a jealousy/resentment towards women. Instinctive alarm bells.
>>44259261>>you're defending an epstein associate>i dont careterf moment
>>44259956Yes, you TIMs have successfully become a bigger threat to women's rights and the safety of girls and women than an international r*ssian child trafficking ring. Good job!
>>44259899Exactly how I feel! They are fixated on us, like skinwalkers. So creepy, dystopian even
>>44259974Bold of you to assume that they aren't part of that and consuming CP. Have you seen the shit they post on here and the anime girls who look prepubescent??
>>44259869I’m not reading any of that. I will never take your ideology seriously.
>>44259758>Studies show that y'all have cluster B disorders,I guess trans women are real women after all>>44259776Your ideology is based on cryptic female supremacy, it’s nazism for girls where instead of being obsessed with true whiteness it’s true womanhood>>44259869>most childhood dysphoria desists>umm ackshually i thought i was a heckin valid trans man but it was just a phase don’t take it too seriously Typical foid behaviour.Samefagging extraordinaire later on ITT btw. You type like a soiboy larping as a lesbian and it doesn’t work because you use the same tone for all of your posts.
>>44260263Aaaand there it is, the incel-speak. Stop hating women for not fucking you, no one is obligated to give you any of their time or attention. Academic literature estimates that approximately 1.5% to 3.2% of cisgender women have personality disorder. What is even FUNNIER is biological MEN have more personality disorders overall, . While exact numbers specific only to cisgender men are difficult to isolate, clinical data indicates they are more frequently diagnosed with Cluster A and Cluster B personality disorders compared to cisgender women!! So I guess they really ARE men
>>44260301We both know that there’s no way in hell it’s that low for cis women, not to mention that they aren’t the same personality disorders. BPD chimp outs are something only seen in women, cis or trans.>no refutation of being the simp fakerWe know what you are.
>>44260455I didn't read that part. Also, it isn't supremacy, I don't think women are inherently better than men, I just don't think biologically a man can ever be a woman. I do not agree with racism, I have even done awareness online about it, and my poc friends and family members. It is not a fair comparison to make. Black women, Asian women, Indigenous women, European women, and latina women, ARE ALL REAL WOMEN. Born female
>>44260945You endorse discrimination on the basis of sex.
>>44259529>>44259763its okay, i know your kind doesn't live for long
>>44250498Jk rowling its a repper, so its shota porn folder must be atrocious
>>44261495I plan to live for ever.
>>44258826>including ovaries forming at all, will not function with only one X chromosome (IE: Turner's syndrome, 45,X karyotype).Nigger thinks women with turners dont have ovaries
>>44259758>>44259776>>44259869>>44259974>defining myself as a bleeding rapehole and incubator isnt sexist because..??
>>44260945Well I'm not sexist, I just believe women shouldnt be allowed to delusionally deny their ONLY biological purpose :3
>>44250498cant you just settle for her being a shitty annoying person?
>>44250498She’s mentioned in the Epstein files and IIRC was a very close friend of his who invited him to some play even after stuff started to come out about the abuse. Look it up. She also recently posted an upskirt of a transgender woman on twitter, which is a sex crime in the UK though I doubt she’ll get punished because she’s a rich famous woman preying on a demonized minority.
The UK has been frothing at the mouth to extradite and charge Andrew Tate for 3 years all because he said it's not gay to fuck a tranny. Accepting trans people IS the most heinous and reprehensible sex crime according to the UK.
>>44250498Lovely bait thread anon, truly well crafted
>>44259869>Sex is real and binary (with rare DSD exceptions).Right, so sex is binary except when it's not. Brilliant, love it when I'm scrolling through binary code and ocassionally find a 2.All your numbers are misrepresented. Your 15-80% is a red flag in itself, you've likely derived your higher number from an Iranian study of patients in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Not a reliable sample to project onto trans people in every population.Dhejne, you've completely misunderstood and/or misrepresented, the crime stats were taken from 1973-2003, with the elevation concentrated among the early cohort and largely dissapearing from 1989 onwards.Djene compared trans peoples' suicidality against the general population and not pre/post-transition, making it useless for measuring the effectiveness of transition. "Risk remained elevated" and "transition did nothing" are not the same statement.The UK prison stats you quoted don't prove anything because the sample size is so small, also no differentiation between those who transitioned before and after custody (IE, the chancers the system is built to filter out)HAHA, imagine being a Blanchard believer in 2026. Blanchard who's typology by his own admission didn't cover the VAST majority of patients he encountered? Nobody except ideologues like you take him seriously. >Women aren't stereotypes or feelingsNobody is saying they are.> therapy-first for youth (per Cass/European shifts)Cass has been torn apart internationally as an ideologically compromised mess.>Most childhood dysphoria desists.No evidence.>High desistance + weak affirmation evidence undermine "transition or suicide." They would if that was the case.>Data favours sex realism over ideologyYOU are the side with the ideology. You are the ones with a stated disgust and distrust toward this patient group. You are the one misrepresenting data on purpose.
>>44250498best you get is benefits fraud: she was on unemployment when she received the advance, she did not declare this.
>>44261727Nigger can't read what I wrote and needs to misrepresent it to feel a crumb of self worth The majority of women with turner's do not have ovaries; they have streak gonads that did not develop. Most of them will not produce sufficient estrogen or feminize a puberty and will require HRT to do so. Maybe try having a crumb of knowledge about the shit you're so confidently trying to refute next time, dumb nigger.
>>44250498She already has, sort of >>44263383>>44263544You’re wasting your time and effort. The poster you’re replying to doesn’t care about any of this. The poster you’re replying to judges facts not based on whether they’re true, but based on whether they advance or hinder their biopolitical goal of eliminating transsexuals (particularly female transsexuals) from public life.As long as you have not understood this, you remain a slave.
>>44265662>The poster you’re replying to judges facts not based on whether they’re true, but based on whether they advance or hinder the biopolitical goal of transsexualsDescribes 90% of troons.
>>44265699Schoolyard-level comeback. Is that the best rhetoric you can spit?
>>44265726Copemaxxed reply. Is that the best rhetoric you can spit?
>>44265742Talking to TERFs is like talking to Rorschach from Peter Watt’s novel Blindsight: Even a human being with only half a brain can see plain as day that you are a Chinese Room.
>>44265855More loony troony nothingburger replies and delusions
>>44265927Q. E. D.
>>44250564she's a billionaireyou know? that group of people that own every single source of information in the modern world? they fucking buy relevance, whether or not anyone is genuinely interested in their thoughts.
>>44259974>1/200 women just existing while trans is literally worse than the global child rape operation run by israel that's implicated and generated blackmail on virtually all western politicians and billionairesI don't even know what to say
>>44265963Doesn’t she do political lobbying?
>>44259758>The mere existence of persons who were born with a cock and balls and take estrogen reduces women to social roles and stereotypesYou people are manifestly insane.
