>"Define a woman">"*reasonable definition*">"Oh so my aunt's sister's daughter's brother's dog's former owner who has Bitchybitchcuntbitchcunt Syndrome doesn't count?"Okay Diogenes.
>>44320798Le strawman has arrived
>>44320798>>"*reasonable definition*"you dont get to skip over the question by not giving your actual definitionodds are it was not, in fact, reasonable
>>44320835"A human being that under typical circumstances possesses the large gamete"
>>44320874Wouldn't it make more sense to just consider the chromosomes then? Everything else requires a disclaimer like yours
>>44320874
>>44320874>>44320891Nah, drop the disclaimer and then when they bring up some weird edge case just say "I see that your definition is contingent on absolute perfection"
>>44320874>provides definition that literally just means "whoever I want to define as a woman" because it's open to interpretation
>>44320924You don't know what a gamete is, do you?
>>44320874>under typical circumstancesthis is not a reasonable definition, it's vague as fuck
I have transcended this level of discourse. I don't give a fuck what a "woman" is, I give even less of a fuck what *you* think a "woman" is. it could not have less of an impact on the life I live.>>44320874utterly pointless definition, it's only utility is to harm trannies. the only half-real definition of "woman" is the raped gender, that exists only in the context of it's opposition to the rapist gender ("man"), and trans women get raped a lot more than they rape others.
>>44320874so what, infertile women don't count? how do you even define "large" here? your definition is dogshit
Being a woman wouldn't matter if men were treated equally to women (minus the top 1%ers). Your feminism made people troon out for sex-based rights and now you want to take those away.
>>44320919The problem is that your definition is vague
>>44321068Trannies existed before the feminist movement
>>44321084>>44321067>>44321044Okay Diogenes.
>>44321118and why exactly is it bad to be like diogenes?
>>44321118Lmao you can admit defeat without acting childish like this you know?
>>44321093They did, but not in this form. They existed to escape societal Homophobia, not to cosplay and abuse Homophobia against gays.Picrel is a homophobic tranny meme, showing the Homophobia of trans ideology
>>44321170>Why is it bad to be like a guy who engaged in public indecency, public defecation, sexual assault, and eating in the marketplace>>44321067You don't know what a gamete is, do you?
>>44321218extremely funny how you have no morals of your own apart from what's legal and what makes you feel icky, so when speaking of ancient societies you fully absorb their perceptions of normalcy and list "eating in the marketplace" alongside sexual assault.also, it doesn't matter what a "gamete" is. nobody knows. "gamete" has zero impact on anyone's life or actions, it may as well not exist, and thus any definition basing itself on "gametes" is useless too.
>>44321273>and list "eating in the marketplace" alongside sexual assault.Never heard the term "Arson, murder, and jaywalking"?>"gamete" has zero impact on anyone's life or actions, it may as well not exist, and thus any definition basing itself on "gametes" is useless too.It's literally what determines if you can impregnate or get pregnant.
>>44321294>It's literally what determines if you can impregnate or get pregnantso is that the important thing? definitions exist to provide utility, the average person has no clue what a gamete is. if your definition of "woman" is "can get pregnant", then that's more respectable. but the whole "gamete" thing is just you dressing up a shitty definition in scientific language to fuck over trannies more, which again is the only utility derived from your definition, and all others have been lost.
>>44320798a woman is a human being socially seen by strangers around her as a female. a female is a human being with a estrogen-dominant endocrinological system. a few months of hrt will make you female but it probably won’t make you pass as one, ergo you’re not actually a woman till you pass
>>44320891Swyers and de la Chapelle syndromes >exception to the rulethe problem with outliers like these is they aren't exceptions to the rule, they're proof you need a new rule
>>44320874being trans is an atypical circumstance, which i can only assume you're happy with. ergo, trans women are women in atypical circumstances.
hi chuddy! here is a relevant hazbin hotel image for your post.
>>44320798>>44321118Woman is a featherless biped. Gotcha.
>BRO trust me there’s an invisible intangible concept of a chair that exists in a dimension of pure reason that we access through our intellect therefore a stool Objectively(tm) isn’t a chair according to facts and logic>source? Um… er…. ITS SELF EVIDENT AND INTUITIVE OK??I fucking hate Pl*to
>>44320822It's always the same
>>44320798youre right! the most important criteria are that it1. excludes *all* trans women2. includes *most* resentful cishonswherever intersexes happen to land is not our business. as long as they agree to cooperate in the national project of turning TiMs into glue.
>>44320798the bait is so weak at night
>>44322881BEHOLD!
>>44321594They're still men and women respectively yeah. See how easy it is to not have exceptions?
>>44322736This
