>>44331708
racist transbian is a pleonasm

>>44331708
Race traitor

transbian is raping me (innocent mixed race stranny)

>>44331708
I like black people. I've been friends with black people, I had sex with a really pretty black woman a bunch of times, I think there's plenty of very intelligent black people
there's still a racial iq difference, just as there are racial height differences and racial skin color differences. Being in a population that has a lower average iq doesn't make any individual stupid and it doesn't make anyone any less of a person. But it's so naive to pretend that different races are different in so many different ways, but never ever different in the brain. The brain is not some magic soul box that is immune to evolutionary differences.

>>44331708
Idk, black people just always seem obnoxious and retarded, at best they're just kind of pathetic nerdy midwits, indistinguishable from similar white people.

being a tranny makes it a lot easier to see how evil white people are i think

>>44333015
all people are evil
you just live around mostly white people

File: xNFTBe3.jpg (115 KB, 849x1200)

115 KB JPG

>>44331708
could never be me, I've been lusting after brown women ever since I trooned out

>>44333039
not really. poc are generally better to me than white people. the only ones who arent are like really fish cis women.

>>44333116
>My 50 year old white parents are less approving of me being a tranny than 20 year olds I met at uni or playing videogames
Wow

>i like talking about naruto
white girl who hasn't watched an anime since 07
>>44333062
this is also a form of racism beeteedubs

>>44333140
no retard just like regular people in regular everyday interactions. white people give me looks, they act weird to me, poc are generally chill and nice.

>>44333116
you're delusional
white people have created the most progressive, most democratic, most tolerant, least sexist, least racist, least homophobic societies in the world. White people went to war and spent trillions of dollars to end slavery and white people to this day spend trillions of dollars giving foreign aid, asylum, doing peacekeeping, and giving away free food for poor nonwhites. You are incredibly ungrateful for the fact that you live in a society where you have any rights at all and aren't forced into an oppressive caste at best, or outright tortured and killed for being nonconforming at worst. Everything you have was created by white people and shared with you out of recognition of mutual humanity, and you thank them by using technology (created by white people) to complain about them. Go live somewhere with no white people for a while and see if you like it better.

File: experience.png (74 KB, 303x248)

74 KB PNG

>

>>44333192
all my rapists were white

>>44333248
you live in a white majority country retard
if all my rapists were black would you think it was ok for me to hate black people?

>>44333256
you already hate black people what if the world was made of pudding

>>44333287
I don't hate black people at all though
do you know how many people hate black people because they were victims of violent crime from black people? What makes you different?

>>44333287
do you think if the "story from north america" guitar guy did big concerts across america he could change evrybody's minds and fix racism?

>>44333192
>white people have created the most progressive, most democratic, most tolerant, least sexist, least racist, least homophobic societies in the world.
you gotta have a SHORT memory to look at things this way. marginalized people in democratic countries have in community with their poc peers fought for and made significant strides in terms of human rights. but wind the clock back, like to the way america came to be in the first place, and you have imperialism and slavery on unimaginable scales. the fact imperial empires are willing to throw their white lgbt constituents a bone is just saving face, it's like when amazon has a giant pride banner in the warehouses they force workers to put their health on the line in to maximize profits.
>White people went to war and spent trillions of dollars to end slavery
oh, and who were they fighting against? maybeee other fucking white people who enslaved them in the first place? not to mention that black people had significant numbers in the union army. and after it was said and done, oppression against black people just took on a different shape in the jim crow era, and the aftershocks of that and slavery, as well as the systemic racism that still exists today, is still disenfranchising poc.
giant empires that build their riches on the back of oppressed and enslaved people cant wash the blood of their hands with any amount of foreign aid. and it's not like the foreign aid we do, though important, is some crazy impossible effort we're putting in out of the goodness of our hearts. on the medical side fucking cuba, little old cuba with sanctions on sanctions and aid boats being blown up in transit to them, is famous for doing more than every g8 country combined.
>You are incredibly ungrateful for the fact that you live in a society where you have any rights
you don't know me.
>Everything you have was created by white people
objectively false. white people built a capitalist system that exploits a global labor force.

>>44333447
>you gotta have a SHORT memory to look at things this way.
yeah well I'm only 30
things were different in the past, but this is true for everyone alive today.
>oh, and who were they fighting against?
in america, other white people. In africa, africans. In the middle east, arabs. Ending slavery was a global effort, I'm not just talking about americans.
But even just talking about americans, that makes white people the only people willing to brutally kill each other because of a moral belief that black people shouldn't be slaves.

>>44333482
>yeah well I'm only 30
i'm 22 bro you live in the age of the internet there's literally nothing stopping you from educating yourself.
>Ending slavery was a global effort
to clarify you do know slavery still exists and that many products readily available in western countries have slavery (and if not systems very close to it) in their supply chains right? clothing in particular comes to mind.
>that makes white people the only people willing to brutally kill each other because of a moral belief that black people shouldn't be slaves.
the *only* people? in history? give me a break. people have fought for oppressed peoples in all places at all times, you just know about the civil war because you're american.

>>44333447
>but wind the clock back, like to the way america came to be in the first place, and you have imperialism and slavery on unimaginable scales. the fact imperial empires are willing to throw their white lgbt constituents a bone is just saving face
i by no means think whites have done no wrongs but its not like nonwhites were ever a safe harbor for these things
there was no safe queer african subculture, no safe queer arab subculture etc etc
centuries before and after initial imperial efforts you look at nonimperial peoples and its mostly the same shit.
the only countries where you can be gay and not get lynched for it are imperial and usually very white
a particular kind of white, which no chud will ever admit because all chuds are subhuman cattle, but it is far and away mostly whites

>>44333248
Unrelated but did you enjoy it at all at any point? Be honest.

>>44333515
first, I'm not american
second, I'm talking about the reality of life today, not that a thousand years ago maybe it was better to live in nonwhite countries than white countries or something
third, it was almost entirely the work and sacrifice of white people in modern day to end slavery. There are no events comparable in scale or effect as the american civil war, where a nation went to war with itself solely for the benefit of an oppressed underclass.
yes, slavery still exists in many places and many modern industries run on slavery. That doesn't mean there isn't a concentrated effort to end slavery and global inequality, which again happens to be primarily funded and promoted by white people.

>>44333515
also by that logic i could just as well say that white people were the only ones willing to brutally kill each other to protect the institution of slavery.
>>44333520
>but its not like nonwhites were ever a safe harbor for these things
many native communities were/are actually. no, the world is not perfect in any place at any time, but white people definitely have more culpability than most.
>the only countries where you can be gay and not get lynched for it are imperial
basically every country on the planet has been touched by imperialism. the white ones just reaped the rewards and built up wealth that has left room for human rights issues to come to the forefront. and to act like nobody in non-white countries could ever care about human rights issues is just so wrong, there are woke people everywhere. yes, many of those places have draconian policies on the books, so did the u.s. 50-75 years ago (and of course in recent years we're putting many new ones in place).
>>44333546
>second, I'm talking about the reality of life today
to what end? just to suck of the nations who came around on some select issues very recently while ignoring the brutal past that produced the conditions which allowed them to do so?
>where a nation went to war with itself solely for the benefit of an oppressed underclass.
i mean, solely is a strong word. the confederacy split off from the rest of america in order to defend the institution of slavery, and the union went to war with them both to end it and because they had committed treason. i think those things together, particularly when you tie them back to the lofty principles america is meant to be about on paper, was what drove union soldiers to act, not simply some endless benevolence toward enslaved people.
>That doesn't mean there isn't a concentrated effort to end slavery and global inequality
i think many more resources are currently being poured into the perpetuation of systems of oppression than toward destroying them.

>>44333620
>to what end?
because it's relevant to people's lives today while the state of the world a thousand years ago isn't?
>i mean, solely is a strong word.
can you give any examples of nonwhite societies doing as much to end slavery as americans or the british?

>>44333620
>many native communities were/are actually
"many" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here
there were about as many safe native communities as safe white communities pre-settlers
>but white people definitely have more culpability than most
yes but they were also the best at unfucking the problems
>and to act like nobody in non-white countries could ever care about human rights issues is just so wrong
i'm not saying like nonwhites don't care about this shit just that they weren't on top of it like the good whites were.
if nonwhites were the allies or standardbearers you think they are then at some point in history they would have made this plainly known.

>>44333635
>because...
i mean like to what end are you even yapping about this like yes i know gay marriage is legal in america woop woop good for us what's your point? the nation with a populus that's generally pretty comfortable and placated as a result of their globe-spanning exploitation is going to have a little more time on their hands to think about things like gay marriage. yet, for every person that fights for human rights there are others who work tirelessly to keep us oppressed.
>can you give any examples of nonwhite societies...
? you said white people went to war with each other *solely* to end slavery. they did not. the confederacy branched off mainly to protect slavery, and the union went to war with them for multiple compounding reasons like i said. and maybe nonwhite societies haven't done as much because nonwhite societies didn't own 10 million slaves in the fucking first place?

>>44333651
>"many" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here
yeah dude many white societies are also backwards shitholes, humans are messy.
>there were about as many safe native communities as safe white communities pre-settlers
that's a weirdly specific claim is that based on numbers?
>yes but they were also the best at unfucking the problems
the problems they created?...
>they weren't on top of it like the good whites were.
very vague, very blind to the obvious differences between america and like kenya.

File: SR_25.06.02_same-sex-marr(...).png (84 KB, 640x466)

84 KB PNG

>>44333685
>i mean like to what end are you even yapping about this like yes i know gay marriage is legal in america
why are the vast majority of countries where gay marriage is legal either european countries or countries colonized by europe?
>maybe nonwhite societies haven't done as much because nonwhite societies didn't own 10 million slaves in the fucking first place?
where the fuck do you think they bought the slaves from?
there was slavery all across africa and asia, and white people were the driving force in ending that. Not africans.

>>44333158
>it's racist to find people beautiful and include them in your dating pool
I'm so glad I'm not a liberal.

>>44333711
>why are the vast majority of countries where gay marriage is legal either european countries or countries colonized by europe?
because they have all the money dude. it's honestly that simple. and they all have aligned interests so once a movement gets started in one of these places it can be beneficial to a country's image and whatnot to go with the flow and let the gays marry.
>where the fuck do you think they bought the slaves from?
who the fuck do you think demanded the slaves and had the money to fund their capture? yes i know there was slavery in africa, but it was small small potatoes compared to what happened when colonial empires got into the slave trade.

>>44333685
>the nation with a populus that's generally pretty comfortable and placated as a result of their globe-spanning exploitation is going to have a little more time on their hands to think about things like gay marriage
oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the blacks just haven't had enough time to think it over wow nona i'm so glad you can open my eyes to your non-condescending non-racist ways
god if only them folk in africa had minimum wage and leisure time they'd be super chill with fags they just haven't had a good vacation in a while
fucking amazing
>>44333705
>that's a weirdly specific claim is that based on numbers?
we haven't even pretended to touch numbers up until this point i'm not going to let you play this card now
there were like 4 or 5 tribes chill with queers meanwhile gays owned like half of london like come on dude
>the problems they created?...
the people who created the problem are not the people who solved it
fact is that it wasn't africa or china or russia who volunteered to fight the civil war. it was whites fighting whites.
this is also why whitness is a nonsense frame for race but unfortunately you're not woke enough to deconstruct whiteness and realise that the civil war was mostly an ideological and class battle rather than one truly about race
>very blind to the obvious differences between america and like kenya
look dude you can vaguely gesture at imperialism all you like but there is a lot of africa that isn't really touched by imperial powers in any real sense and there were also THOUSANDS of years where basically nobody fucking touched the place and yet historically it was homophobic to hell and back
>>44333790
fetishization is bad
>>44333981
WHY DO THE AFRICANS NOT VIEW IT AS BENEFICIAL TO THEIR IMAGE TO NOT MURDER QUEERS FUCKWIT????????
god you're 22 why am i taking you seriously

My people aren't wypipo. My people are trans people, and we come in many colors

>>44334028
>the blacks just haven't had enough time to think it over
i mean kind of it's like hierarchy of needs shit you know? it's easier to worry about self-actualizing once your material needs are met. like all these pushes for rights in america really started ramping up once people were wealthy and comfortable after the post-ww2 economic boom. i love how you chuds always get so offended on black people's behalf and have to do this whole "heh you libs are the real racists" act while the alternative explanation for you is i guess that black people are just genetically predisposed to being homophobic? like
>we haven't even pretended to touch numbers up until this point i'm not going to let you play this card now
i know we're both uninformed losers arguing on the internet i'm just saying the way you phrased that was very specific.
>the people who created the problem are not the people who solved it
you said 'white people' solved the problems, white people also created the problems. yes obviously there was a generational gap.
>fact is that it wasn't africa or china or russia who volunteered to fight the civil war.
why would any of those places ever get involved in fighting the confederacy that doesn't even make sense
>and realise that the civil war was mostly an ideological and class battle rather than one truly about race
maybe to an extent for the union soldiers i already said that. but the confederacy was very much about slavery. they saw where the nation was headed and their economies were heavily dependent on slavery so they fought like hell to keep it around.
>THOUSANDS of years where basically nobody fucking touched the place and yet historically it was homophobic
like every place inhabited by white people wasn't also homophobic thousands of years ago? i mean maybe once we go back to greece or the roman empire.
>WHY DO THE AFRICANS NOT VIEW IT AS BENEFICIAL TO THEIR IMAGE
white imperial nations arent their peers and can even be viewed as an enemy.

>>44334182
>i love how you chuds always get so offended on black people's behalf and have to do this whole "heh you libs are the real racists" act while the alternative explanation for you is i guess that black people are just genetically predisposed to being homophobic
not a chud dumbfuck
my explanation is that african dice rolled poorly and their culture so far hasn't invested much into the kind of rationalism it takes to not be homophobic
and the ones that weren't homophobic were either wiped out or absorbed by larger cultures
Red Queen scenario
>i'm just saying the way you phrased that was very specific.
i mean yeah like there were a handful of safe tribes and a handful of white safe spaces
not like the majority of tribes or the majority of whites were pro queer at the time
>white people also created the problems
two different groups of white people
>yes obviously there was a generational gap.
ideological gap
>why would any of those places ever get involved
france kinda fucked around with the revolutionary war a bit on our behalf
but my point was that none of them helped solve the issue nor lighten the load in any way
good white people in america solved the problem that bad whites caused
>but the confederacy was very much about slavery
you're missing my point
>like every place inhabited by white people wasn't also homophobic thousands of years ago?
why do blacks get a fucking pass?
they had no pre-imperial motive to be homophobic
you can't absolve them of guilt in the modern day of homophobia due to imperialism if they were also fucking homophobic before the imperialism
whites were starting to into gay acceptance on small scales WAYYYYYYY before they started doing the imperialsim meanwhile no african society has budged an inch on the issue
>and can even be viewed as an enemy.
ooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh killing queers is okay if you do it to be unlike wypepo woooooooooooooowwwwwwww i didn't know that thanks buddy

File: Screenshot_20260316_22392(...).jpg (357 KB, 1079x1531)

357 KB JPG

sissa....
you know what you must do...

>>44334270
>two different groups of white people
obviously, so what? i don't understand what you're getting at with anything you're saying you're just arguing to argue rn. i come on here and talk about how white ppl are all assholes to me and poc arent and some smartass feels the need to correct me on my own personal life experience and i patiently explain exactly what my problem with white people is even beyond the way they treat me in my day to day and youre still going to come at me spewing disingenuous uninformed bs and yapping about how there's a lot of homophobia in african countries like i dont already know to prove a point i absolutely cannot decipher.

>>44331708
Now every bipoc will u think u want sleep with them lmfao

>>44331708
>Tranny
>Vibes with monkeys
Makes sense, try not to get cannibalized though, wouldn't want the ngubus to catch AIDS from your axe wound.

>Oh I don't hate all niggers
Dumbass, they hate you. Most of them on the back of their poorly developed brains have at least some wish to kill you because you're superior. And the people who do hate white people don't even make the same excuse. Why not just look back in anger and say fuck 'em all?

File: 1784902282172223.jpg (41 KB, 640x640)

41 KB JPG

>>44334270
>if they were also fucking homophobic before the imperialism
shit you made up. africa became homophobic after being converted to abrahamic religion. various colonial powers enforced homophobic laws on populations that never gave a shit about any of that. you cant just talk about cultural dice rolls when 70 years ago you would get chemically castrated for being a homosexual

>>44331708
>Should i get an N word pass?
How far you've come, how far you must yet go

>>44334785
>africa became homophobic after being converted to abrahamic religion
abrahamics are evil yes but africa was not in any large part queer accepting b4 they had their native religions forcibly stripped

File: 1784066809039-5.png (348 KB, 368x930)

348 KB PNG

>>44334814
i dont think homosexuality was even much of a discrete concept to begin with, as has been the case for much of the world. it is hard to be particularly homophobic as it isnt a cultural phenomenon enough to form much of an opinion on anything. meanwhile ofc in greece they were buttfucking eachother all the time and it is precisely within that cultural context that semitic religions started to articulate a homophobic position

i should actually push on you because i think your assumption about the root of homophobia is misguided and coloured by modernistic progressive illusions. you imply that african culture has stuck to homophobia because it has not invested much into "rationalism", but the origins of western homophobia in fact stems from western rationality. we tend to overestimate how ancient the old testament it, but chunks of it arguably could have been developed after plato. imo the abrahamic prescriptions against homosexuality stem back to plato. whilst throughout the dialogues he has an ambivalent relationship, in his text Laws, he outright rejects it and advocates for it to be banned. the route of his reasoning stems from natural law and the teleology of human sexuality being towards reproduction. this was itself a distinctly philosophical approach to morality that was novel to ancient greece. if you look at the catholic church, their stance against homosexuality has always been rationalistic, and in Love and Responsibility you can see pope john paul II articulating an argument rooted in phenomenology against homosexual practice. finally, we must also appreciate that rationalizations against homosexuality have also existed within medical paradigms in a way commensurate with a technocratic rationality

>>44335002 (cont)
last century, it was common in the west to categorize homosexuality as a psychological disorder. ultimately what really changed wasnt merely an improvement in science (as incremental accumulation of data is not sufficient for a paradigm shift), but civil rights advocacy and the greater sexual revolution in the west which led us to rethink our relation to sexuality within the west. note how in places like soviet russia, an atheistic scientific rationality was dominant, yet they still banned homosexuality

as an aside on the natural law side of things, we see teleological concepts making a comeback (and to an extent they have never really left us) as useful conceptual vocabularies for explaining phenomena, so even within a modern scientific paradigm you could still develop a system of natural law that would argue against the existence of homosexuality

idk why i typed so much but i guess it is because i believe this has been a very basic progressivist error that has led to the evasion of deeper structural analyses. check this blog post to read more:
https://hidwehproject.nekoweb.org/pages/blog/posts/2025-11-04-On-The-Transgender-Question.html

Bump

SASUKE
IS VERY COOL
SAKURA
THE BEAUTIFOOL

I vibe with some blacks as individuals, but overall I still see the importance of being racist. I'm not much of a supremacist but I am a differentist.

>>44335002
>>44335056
you kinda blew me the fuck out btw i think

Bump