Couldn't we train low-dose X-ray machines stationed outside female space to recognize female bone shapes with "AI", and just sync a gate to the machine so that anyone who wants to enter has to get bone scanned?I wonder if we will ever get to having portable chromosome detection scanners. Then it will be fully over for transgenderists.
>>44431233Orrr... just treat passing trannies as women and the ugly ones as perverts?
>>44431253passing is a myth
>>44431272i realize only a small fraction of a percent actually pass, but that doesn't mean you should reject the evidence of your eyes and ears and say none pass
>>444312760% of trans women look like womensociety is willing to pretend, to some degree, that attractive gay male crossdressers are womenit's about being hot, not looking like a woman
>>44431233Alternatively you could also gtfo of my board.
>>44431319nah
>>44431233>be me hater of everything feminine>fool tranny haters to give themselves cancer>and men in dresses will be blamed >:D
>>44431233>Hey Jim how many chest x-rays do you want the average person to have for using the bathroom in public?>Millions
>>44431233they are already putting flock cameras in school gyms. I think flock could team up with palantir to come up with an AI transvestigation algo.
>>44431253>pretty people can't be perverts
>>44435185I guess when you think about it trannies do believe that. They go on and on about hating ugly people.
>>44436131everyone hates ugly people though
>>44436186I don't. I think our world is lost because we ignore talented people who don't meet an aesthetic standard. People like you are highly dangerous and toxic.
>>44431233bone differences are on a larger scale, there are some men with proportionally larger hips than some women
>>44431233Yes please hahaha i would love to see cisgender women bitch and moan that the penis detecting machine read them as male... Specially UK women
>>44436378If you cross reference multiple bone proportions, no man would pass. >there are some men with proportionally larger hips than some womennot relative to their shoulders
>>44436395You would be surpriced, please go ahead and continue with your plan, it will hurt cis women x200 more than it will ever hurt trans women
>>44436244you have an inherent built in bias to treat pretty people better, you may try to compensate for it with conscious effort but it is still there whether you like it or not
>>44431279When you're working a small town library as a female librarian it's because you pass, not because you're pretty
>>44436493No, I have a bias to treat pretty people worse knowing how intellectually incompetent they usually are.
>>44431272 defense mechanisms are real
>>44431233Giving cis people cancer and costing the taxpayer billions for no reason. Genius idea anon you should go into politics
>>44431279You need to get out of Susan'sPlace and touch some grass in the big O' 2026 my fren
>>44436543LOW DOSE
>>44431233I imagine even at a low dose over a lifetime of pissing you're still increasing the risk of cancer for women
>>44436695Low dose multiple times a day for years every time you take a piss in public or fix your makeup or just need to gab with your friends or need to go back in because you forgot something on the counter... You getting cancer
>>44436877REALLY low dose
>>44436894Dude even if you could theoretically make the dose low enough it would just spread conspiracy theories like 5G cellular , nobody would put up with this
>>44431233lmao, do it-troon
>>44436900they would if it kept them safe from dangerous male tranny sex fiends
>>44431233Cant wait for the malding of britbongs getting called out
>>44436917Are these tranny sex fiends in the room with us right now nona?
>>44438397yes!
good idea
>>44431233Good way to enact TFD. I approve
>>44436695I'm that anon you just responded to, you do realise multiple exposures still increases the risk, its why radiographers still have to wear protective gear, and wear a monitior to track their dosage. Chest scans are especially risky in young people.You're obviously not grown up enough for these conversations
>>44436551Do they pass though? The bodies are very clearly male, and if you can't pass in a hoodie and sweats then you don't pass.
>>44442713Just look at >>44438397... Those 2 in the pictures are 2 cisgender women, they were able to pass enough to compete officially but not pass enough to terfs complaining online.So if even ciswomen cannot pass as women then the criteria kinda losses the meanonf
>>44444172ignore me
