I don't care. I ignore women. Do not give attention. Do not watch their content. Simps should be taxed to 100% of their net worth.

>>44436239
is this what passes for pretty nowadays in america

>>44436264

She's French and her posts/story originated in French language media.

>>44436258

Can you explain more of your thoughts on this? I think lots of people despise low IQ male Simps for different reasons.

Do you find men aesthetically superior? Morally superior? Who would you say is to blame for this? Does it make you envious or just annoyed?

>>44436363
same thing she would’ve been below average in the 90s

>>44436239
Jewish dads often buy viral fame for their daughters to celebrate their rhinoplasty. Same thing as Hailey Welch. Both were made famous by Barstool Sports

>>44436411
I love women physical but I hate them on a metaphysical plan. I hate western women, what they are become. The people to blame are the ones making money out of it so mostly companies based in SF. Women are given a fake illusion of freedom and everyone is suffering from it. Men have their own set of responsibiliies but being a throw away product is bad enough. If every man ignored women on socials and stopped using the dating app, we could get a chance to come back to a state where relationships are more sane and based on reality.

>>44436513

Aren't men objectively the ones that cause this though? Men are the ones who click on it, the ones who leave likes and comments, and the ones who subscribe, right?

The female/gay/tranny brain meanwhile is like:

*sees thirst trap thumbnail*
Thinks: "this is bait, it's for coomers," doesn't click.
*Then, maybe she clicks*
Thinks: "okay she's hot. But I don't want people to see me liking it" breaks engagement.
*then maybe she likes it*
Thinks: "okay a discrete like is fine, but i'm too shy to comment i don't want her to be aware i'm looking" doesn't comment.
*but maybe she finds it so hot she must comment*
Thinks: "well I will leave a gentle supportive comment not be thirsty" doesn't subscribe to OF.

At every level the female brain has more restraint and is less likely to generate profit, right? Meanwhile a male has liked, commented "so sexy beautiful please marry me" and subscribed to OF because pp hard before he has even had a single thought, right?

So isn't the way to stop it to make men more afraid, and shrink their ego? Just a thought experiment, not saying i want to do that.

>>44437403
>Aren't men objectively the ones that cause this though? Men are the ones who click on it, the ones who leave likes and comments, and the ones who subscribe, right?
Yes, we need to erase these simps from history
>The female/gay/tranny brain meanwhile is like:
>
>*sees thirst trap thumbnail*
>Thinks: "this is bait, it's for coomers," doesn't click.
>*Then, maybe she clicks*
>Thinks: "okay she's hot. But I don't want people to see me liking it" breaks engagement.
>*then maybe she likes it*
>Thinks: "okay a discrete like is fine, but i'm too shy to comment i don't want her to be aware i'm looking" doesn't comment.
>*but maybe she finds it so hot she must comment*
>Thinks: "well I will leave a gentle supportive comment not be thirsty" doesn't subscribe to OF.
That's still giving attention and validation to whoring out, into reeducation camps it goes
>At every level the female brain has more restraint and is less likely to generate profit, right? Meanwhile a male has liked, commented "so sexy beautiful please marry me" and subscribed to OF because pp hard before he has even had a single thought, right?
Gas them, they are a fraction of people
>So isn't the way to stop it to make men more afraid, and shrink their ego? Just a thought experiment, not saying i want to do that.
Work has to be done both sides. I'm not saying men aren't part of the problem