but are YOU (the person reading this) AGP, husstuss or something else entirely?
>>44612684lesbian hsts
>>44612684I am a man.
>>44612697but as a man are you AGP husstuss or something else entirely
>>44612702Maybe a touch AGP? I crossdressed when I was younger but I never had any indentity crisis over it, it just felt kinda hot since I was a slender twink and people were into it.I'm balding now so it doesn't do anything for me anymore, just feels kinda gross.I'm a regular bisexual now.
>>44612684I don't really take that blanchard stuff seriously but I'm bi with a preference for other women which I thought would supposedly be agp under his framework, but I saw someone post some questionnaire a while back that they said was the actual criteria for agp/hsts, and according to that I'd be hsts. I'm not sure if that would make me hsts or if my sexual preferences would make me a secret third thing? I dunno, this shit is dumb.Honestly I think the only reason anyone takes this stuff seriously is because the whole "agp opticsnuke rapehon" stereotype does kind of exist but such people aren't actually trans, just cis transvestic fetishists or emasculation fetishists who get wrongfully conflated with actual trans women, and the spread of the stupid "trans umbrella" nonsense has contributed to the problem.
>>44612684both because after reading blanchard i genouinely dont know what am i>inb4 youre agp
I am an effeminate gay man, who, not being homophobic, does not take hrt or claim to experience "sex dysphoria".
i am ME em eee EMM EEE