most trans women are sexist. most trans women have a very male view of what it means to be a woman
>>44777824Cool story sis
>>44777824It's autism
>>44777824the same can be said of cis women. let's not forget the majority of cis women in the US voted trump in.
>>44777824my mom always told me i wasnt like most people
it is self evidentmost date like gay men
>>44778031how do gay men date? Honest question.
>>44777974Joe Biden and Kamala Harris murdered thousands of people
>>44778065Yeah, but Trump literally ate every child in the mainland US.Oh, sorry, I thought we were making shit up.
>>44777824I'm only sexist, transphobic, misogynistic, spiteful, hateful towards myself. I try my best to care for other women more than I care for myself. I think trans women are women and I will defend every woman till death, but i will never defend myself. I just hate myself. If I'm ever mean or awful to anyone it's because of my deep self hatred. I don't know about anyone else tough.P.S I need someone to treat me like in the pic.
>>44778073?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_genocider u retarded
>>44777824this is true, but it's because to be viewed as women they have to fit certain steoretypes, otherwise it's just harder for them. the world is already pissed at trans women for some reason, imagine how pissed they'd be if they were "masc" too, most trans women dont want to deal with that.
>>44778092who cares
>>44777824Most cis women are sexist; trans women tend to have a higher, more consistent rate of feminist ethos and practical feminist beliefs.>>44777974And let's not forget that a cis woman was the deciding vote on removing abortion rights, while many trans women protested alongside our cis sisters.>>44777980Funny, my mom told me that I need to get over my NLOG phase and start wearing more pink and cute dresses.Thanks, mom, but I'm a 30-year-old woman who has been transitioning for a decade; I have my own style. I'm sorry you didn't get to play dress-up with me when I was 5 because you didn't know I was a girl. I did try to tell you, though. Where was this energy then?
>>44778110netanyahu owns you lil bro
>>44778049So if they were playing a strategy game it would be described as building wide rather than tall.
>>44778112can you put in in non autistic terms?
>>44778092Ah, right, sorry, I forgot that "continuing a congressionally required deal while trying to work towards a lasting peace agreement through political pressure" = "personally committing murder".That's my bad. Well, good thing you put a stop to that and put a start to Trump murdering thousands of people by blowing up that peace deal, helping put in place a ceasefire that both sides immediately started violating, and starting another war in the meantime. That sure was a good thing.
>>44778111He owns you too. The Republicans' winning only benefited his interests. But y'all don't want to talk about the material impacts of your choices on the actual people living in the Gaza Strip.
>>44778151>thinking it matters who gets electedlibtard
>>44778155> Thinking it doesn'tActual dumbassWho gets elected doesn't automatically result in a good outcome because both sides suck in the US. It does, however, have material impacts on people both in the US and abroad on massive scales.Also, I'm a leftist. You just don't like thinking about the real negative impact of your actions, so you choose to frame it as "it doesn't matter anyway!".
>>44778092Filistroon sisters ...
>>44778112Incomprehensible, thank you
>>44778200He means trans women are sluts. Which isn't actually universally true, nor is it universally untrue for cis women. Honestly, he is just kinda saying shit.The reason trans women tend to have less stable partners is that men will literally treat us as "disposable sex toys that cry" while promising the world.
>>44778133He promised no more wars tho lmfao.To be fair the U.S foreign policy is bipartisal and completely consistent between various administrations.Dr. Trumplove or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love the Zog
>>44778208Its pretty much true for both
>>44778133he paid for their guns, he gave them bombs, she gave them intel, they worked closely together. RETARD
>>44778353jeffrey epstein was mossad. israel owns trump.
>>44777824>most trans women have a very male view of what it means to be a womanAnd what view is that?
>>44778353They are working together and have proposed a military merger now! How dumb are you?And again, that "paid for their guns" was part of the standard congressional deal. The president doesn't even have authority to override here. You are an utter moron.
>>44778365>america has been funding and supporting israel for 70 years but only the last 2 years, which are not even in the top 5 of most eventful, has israel controlled trumpRETAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARD
>>44778396>"everything you said was right but ur a utter morron"???
>>44778408I think I may have thought you were someone else talking about someone else. Sorry.
>>44778125>>44778200pic is a hint>>44778208>yes I'm a whore but it's men who are to blamevery womanly of you, I could also fuck a lot of men that would pump and dump me and yet by some peculiar male deficiency I abstain. Must be because I'm not hot enough.only sevens and up get the loose retard gene o algo.What does impress me is that I insulted the promiscuity of gay men to compare you to and that part you took no issue with.So, given your selective hearing I can only discern you have some homophobic proclivities which, for a respectable trans woman, is very shocking to learn.
>>44778208>>44778708Oh! I neglected to address the fact that you also inferred my statement somehow absolved cis women of that same behavior despite never even bringing them up.You have the reading comprehension of women to be sure. Who cares what I typed, it's how you felt about it that dictates what it meant.
>>44778185>simping for kikesthe soiteens have fallen
>>44778133biden was a RABID fucking zionist who gave israel way, way more leeway than he had to. governments before him knew to keep a steady hand on the leash
>>44778151>>44778162do you seriously believe the elections aren't rigged? look at all this. it's orchestrated. everything is a circus designed to keep us just complacent enough not to kill too many of them. they know they've already won.
>>44778861stop trying to make me like biden its almost working
>>44778237how are you so witty and yet so retarded
>>44779031you should. objectively he's done way more for the zoggers than trump has
why is the thread suddenly about israel
>>44779062it's 4chan. these people get the itch after 8 seconds without bringing up da joos
>>44778478Men lieWomen believe them> This is the women's fault!> Why don't women accept responsibility!?That's certainly a take of all time.> What impresses me is that I insulted the promiscuity of gay men to compare you to, and that part you took no issue with.That's on you. I am not a gay man, so yeah, it wasn't an insult to me. IDK what you want from me there. It's not my job to defend gay men from the claims of gay men?> So, given your ... very shocking to learn.Again, it's not my place to defend your own community from you?>>44778739> Trans women date like gay men, which shows they are men.> Cis women also date in the same way now that you called me out on it.Questionable ability to extrapolate from your own statement.Look, everyone knows you are that misogynistic transphobic Gincel.
>>44779169>men lie women believe themSure, and the inverse is true also. Doesn't really have any bearing on the frequency with which it's done. You can only play stupid so many times.>That's certainly a take of all time.So because men aren't an entirely faultless demographic every woman is justified in their promiscuity? I agree that is quite the take. The lengths you'll go to rather than admit some women suck is staggering.>That's on you. I am not a gay man, so yeah, it wasn't an insult to me. IDK what you want from me there. It's not my job to defend gay men from the claims of gay men?I suppose you don't burden yourself with concepts like truth unless when it's advantageous to do so, that much is evident.>Again, it's not my place to defend your own community from you?No but it does indicate your character and your principles, or lack thereof. As the situation calls for, I suppose.>which shows they are menGiven your proclivity to draw your own conclusions from what I type I don't suppose the leap in logic here is any surprise, but it is worth pointing out. Didn't say that, your mind jumping to that conclusion says more about you than me>Cis women also date in the same way now that you called me out on it.Again trying to reframe it as though I'm saving face rather than addressing that you made a baseless assumption built on bias, an assumption that was irrelevant to the topic. >Questionable ability to extrapolate from your own statement.Proximity doesn't equate to relevance, your insistence on shifting the landscape of the argument isn't a gotcha it's the unraveling of your point because at no stage here have we ever put into question the validity of the original statement which was that trannies date like gay men. Perhaps because we both know it's true and the optics are simply inconvenient, perhaps not. But your priority at redirection indicates you're probably not too confident in the direct approach, otherwise you would've chosen it from the start.
>>44778861Did he actually do anything besides following protocol?>>44779027They aren't, and if you understood the electrical system, you would know better. The whole point of the "it's rigged" and "both sides are the same" rhetoric is a social engineering tactic to depress voter bases.The ultrarich wouldn't spend so much money on it if the electoral system itself was truly captured.>>44779031You are evil. May I think the other leftist? Here is naive, but at least they have good intentions. You actively support innocent people dying>>44779062This comment chain:>>44777974>>44778065
>>44779301* I may think
>>44779169>>44779284And no, I'm neither gay or an incel and I wouldn't say I'm transphobic or misogynistic. I'm just not an ally either. If you find criticism offensive that's a flaw for you to deal with on your own time but don't project those shortcomings on me. It takes a certain type of person to think a lack of promiscuity constitutes an effective insult and I hate to be so redundant but it says more about you than me that that's the first thing you reach for.
>>44779284>implying promiscuity needs to be justified
>>44779301oh nooo le heckin 300 billion gorgillion innocent super totally indigenous arab children who are also all journalists and pregnant are dying everyday!!! the horror!!!!
>>44779301>Did he actually do anything besides following protocol?somehow I doubt there were specific requirements unique to his presidency that forced him not to stop this particular bid to start carpet bombing like previous presidents did
>>44779326Why would you incite men lying as a defense if there was nothing to defend? Why not just own the promiscuity? Or were we shifting back to that only once the deflection failed?For the record I have no issue with you or anyone being a slut, I just wouldn't want to date one so it's good to be honest about it up front. Yet you seem to have an issue with it. Why would you bristle at the accusation at all if it's normal? Or has your stance changed again just to try and discredit someone pointing out what you are? Odd to decide being a slut is fine to try and discredit an argument where I was calling trannies sluts, could've just started there instead of deflecting and finger pointing.So I guess what I'm saying in brief is I accept your concession.
>>44779332Most empathetic tranny
>>44779389im nta i didnt even read allat lol
>>44779402there's no way that's a tranny
>>44779284OP:> Most trans women are sexist. Most trans women have a very male view of what it means to be a womanYou:> It is self-evident> Most date like gay menI will let that statement speak for itself. The meaning is clear even if you want to pretend it's not. Acting dumb about it isn't going to make anyone else believe you actually are.> Again trying to ... irrelevant to the topic.Bad lie trying to divert attention.> Proximity doesn't equate ... from the start.I don't actually see promiscuity as a horrible thing. I see you trying to implicitly argue that trans women are not like cis women as the problem. I have no reason to argue that your initial implication (that trans women are promiscuous) is wrong because I don't think it matters. It may be true; it may not. That's not my concern.I attacked the secondary implication because the implication of the OOP was that trans women are men. And your statement was in defense of that implication. People are not going to go along with your stupid attempt to ignore your own implications in follow-up discussion.>>44779318Now that's interesting, because you only denied the claim of being gay later when you realized it could win you argument points.We know who you are, Gincel.>>44779389Not the person you were referring to, but I had already answered earlier here.Confusing that you would accept the confession of someone who:* Is not the person you were talking to* Didn't concedeBut in the same spirit, I accept your concession, since we are apparently doing that out of nowhere now.>>44779446 <- also not me, just FYI.
>>44779446I accept your concession.
>>44779457Again odd to do that but since you have already concesseded via nonsense claims of concession, I am not sure why you are still speaking.
>>44779364Did he actually do anything besides following protocol or did he not? If you know as much about the situation as you claim, you should easily be able to give me a direct answer that can be backed up. This isn't a hard or gotya question.
>>44779389>responding to a silly glegle post with an essaylmao
>>44779491>arms sales to countries that restrict humanitarian aid is prohibited by american law>idf fails to comply with a direct order to stop starving civilians>weapon shipments continueyes, his administration did in fact violate protocol
>>44779456>I will let that statement speak for itself.That's a first.>The meaning is clear even if you want to pretend it's not.well that didn't last long>Acting dumb about it isn't going to make anyone else believe you actually are.I don't think someone acting dumb would explain the flaws in your logic, but I guess dismissing that rather than addressing it is your idea of intelligence. I suppose not arguing with you might've been more intelligent, you've got me there.>Bad lie trying to divert attention.Not addressing the argument, just dismissing it. You might as well write "Nuh uh">I don't actually see promiscuity as a horrible thingAnd yet your initial point was focused entirely on the point of the promiscuity and not the point of trans women not being women. You sure took the long way around to get to your point, you should start with it next time, but sure let's shift goal posts again since I've got all day to argue with people that have already chosen to be unreasonable.>I attacked the secondary implication....my implication was in defense of his implication that trans women are men. So none of this is written down but by your very unbiased point of view you discerned that messages that could be construed to be anti trans are therefore definitely anti trans.The implication of the initial post isn't even blatantly so, it says trans women are sexist. That's not the same thing. Unless you're equating sexism to being a man which is once again an issue of your own bigotry.>people are not going to go along...does consensus dictate accuracy now? Because that doesn't bode well for the whole lgbt movement if that's the case...>you only denied the claim of being gayI brought it up when you accused me of it, and I corrected you. I don't see that my orientation was relevant to the argument before that point.>We know who you are, Gincel.I guess if you say it often enough you'll believe it.
>>44779456>Not the person you were referring to, but I had already answered earlier here.I must not be on the right medication to see where else you answered, because it was the first reply to my comment after I posted it.>Is not the person you were talking toWow you got me, on an anonymous board I couldn't tell you apart from someone else, damn I guess I'm wrong now> Didn't concedethey did, though they may not have intended to>>44779467You are getting real desperate to find some angle here where you didn't just start an argument based on assumptions that you found convenient and it's starting to look sad. Do you think random anons joining in and going "lmao" makes you argument any better? I guess if it makes you feel better that's the same thing. I'm glad.>>44779496yeah this guy.
>>44779548Huh. So yeah, that's fair. After looking at it, every administration for nearly a decade has been ignoring that rule (by apparently declaring Israel's small permitted capacity for humanitarian aid to not be considered "restricting" but instead "securing at the highest capacity reasonably possible"?Yeah, that's really fucked up. I would hardly put the blame entirely on Biden; he would have to use an authority that multiple previous presidents had chosen not to use, and he did threaten to use it in order to get them to incrementally increase the aid they were letting through.Thank you for the information. I would still have voted for Biden over Trump given his marginally better actions here and monumentally better actions elsewhere, but yeah, it's really messed up that the bar for letting humanitarian aid in was not much higher.
>>44779581> Unless you're equating sexism to being a man, which is once again an issue of your own bigotry.No, that would be the OP:> Most trans women have a very male view of what it means to be a womanA statement that was part of what you agreed with.> Does consensus dictate accuracy now?No, but the way you are arguing has everything to do with persuasion and nothing with uncovering accurate models of reality.> I brought it up when ... point.In a separate post, after the initial one? Not in response to the section where it came up?But ok, I will concede that at this point I no longer think you are Gincel. He would have admitted it by now.>>44779604> I must not be on the right medication to see where else you answered, because it was the first reply to my comment after I posted it.That's fair; I meant to say earlier in this reply. That was my bad.> Wow, you got me, on an anonymous board I couldn't tell you apart from someone else, damn I guess I'm wrong nowCouldn't you tell a shit post from the person you were having a long-form conversation with? Yeah, that one is on you.> Do you think random anons joining in and going "lmao" makes you argument any better?No? I was just pointing out that they are not me.
>>44779548>>44779701And also messed up that our bar for presidents is so low that our choice is "a guy who won't stop a genocide besides saying 'Let more humanitarian aid through, please?'" and "I actually want the place destroyed so I could build a hotel there!"We really were at rock bottom and then decided to drill to bedrock...
>>44777824i just won't tow the line. what's wrong is wrong and a lot of women tend to behave in shitty ways that society would never tolerate from a man. case in point, how many grade school teachers got caught having sex with their students?
>>44779825They generally get punished for that.
>>44777824I hate women and how stupid they are. I hate how they can act like ditzy retards and everyone loves them. I hate how their gross blood soaked tampons stink up the trash. I hate how everyone bends over backwards for them feeling bad because theyre "women".
>>44777824do cisf chasers really want trans women to spit in their mouths? because I would do that
>>44778861because trump is so much better?biden at least reigned in yoohoo's worst impulses>vote kamala, several million gazans die>vote trump, they all die, gaza literally gets turned into a fucking trump hotel and golf course by mobbed up real estate mogul jared kushneri dont know if you voted trump or didnt vote kamala b/c "i refuse to vote for the lesser of 2 evils"if you voted trump because he was so blatantly lying about stopping the gaza war you are an irredeemable idiotif you refused to vote kamala (whether abstaining or going jill stein), you are also an idiot because you think this makes you enlightened when in fact you are really saying "i am throwing away my vote so i dont have to face the horrors of what is really going to happen. and if that means all the gazans die, so be it, but at least i get to feel morally superior". you're the kind of person who thinks the solution to the trolley problem is to stand idly by is the indisputably correct solution because then you think you can never be personally implicated, that your action is the neutral one with respect to human life and therefore correctin other words go fuck yourself, you are the reason we are where we are now
>>44780153No, it's the other way around.
>>44777824and there's nothing anyone can do about it because everyone refuses to have honest conversations with each other.Trans women are women, and all women are terfs.
>>44780175I see. that's unfortunate to hear, but not very surprising
