>HSTSThe “early onset” trans woman represents the stereotypical, biological understanding of gender in-congruence, in which a woman’s mind is “born into the wrong body”, with a specific emphasis on her inability to reproduce organically with men. She is the only type of trans woman that can rightfully claim the title of “natural product of human genetic diversity”, because she is actually born that way, through genetic recombination. Embodying the retrenchment of the human mode of reproduction, she is typically straight (Kay Brown confusingly calls her “homosexual”, on account of her sexual receptivity) and likely to feel dysphoric about her lack of a uterus. These are the women who have existed historically as eunuchs and “third sex” effeminate homosexual men; in modern times, they are the least visible and least vocal group of trans women because they pass much more easily than late onset types. She is, predictably, highly invested in assimilation, often to the point of distancing herself from visibly-trans (non-passing) women, whose mannerisms and appearances she tends to deride as “artificial” and “unnatural” (descriptions which are potently true).
>>44779330I must emphasize that her investment is not ideological, but a matter of survival: “early onset” means female socialization, and all of its attendant rapes, abuses, denigration, “sissification”, etc. which counteract the (male-socialized) self confidence that allows late onset types to practice gender non-conformity as adult women (such as, for example, dressing masculine while still using “she/her” pronouns). The female-socialized trans woman is a “problem” created by men, an Apollonian tragedy made flesh, which only patriarchy can “solve” via her consumption in the marriage market. Her fate is to flatly reaffirm the stagnant, regressive politics of the subject/object dichotomy, then disappear. Ironically, it is in this sense that the early onset trans woman embodies the autoterminating nature of male sexuality: she cannot produce children, she can only be produced, wholly dependent on the soon-to-be obsolete spinwheel of organic reproduction.
I dont dissacociate with queers because I think they are fake or less valid, I just want to not be around cringe autistics
>>44779338>AutogynephilesThe “late onset” trans woman is, in contrast, utterly unconcerned with organic reproduction and instead embodies an inorganic, post-human mode of reproduction. She is more likely to be asexual or lesbian, as well as politically radical. She more often wishes to abolish (or accelerate) human gender than to retrench it. She is more likely to opt for atypical genital surgeries which de-prioritize the simulation of organic penetrative sex, and prioritize self-pleasure: without a need for men, she is her own art object, and sees herself as ontologically complete. She speaks of “trans women” as a collective subject (to the annoyance of people like Kay Brown) whose specific and unique function is to (re)produce the future, either through social progress (which improves the rights of trans people and their ability to transition), visibility campaigns (which aim to increase self-awareness of trans women as a group), or reinvestment (scientific research, DIY hormones/surgery, coding/computer science, trans studies, etc.)
>>44779342She is so enmeshed with technocapital at this point that she could not imagine existing in the past, besides perhaps the male transvestites, who likewise attempted, in earlier epochs, to take self-objectification to its logical extreme. In constructing her image, she takes influence from historical transvestism, androgynes, and lesbians, tending to dress anachronistically (age regression, period costume) and visibly “queer”. She struggles to mimic cis femininity, pathetically scapegoating her “dysphoria” as the cause. As Kay Brown rightly points out, the reality is more complex: socialized male, she develops an autogynephilic gaze, an inner eye which incessantly consumes her own body. The result is recursion, an accelerated loop of subject-object oscillation that ends up obliterating the distinction altogether: hyper-real, metacognizant, an actor melting into her character… (This is why her patron saint is ketamine.) It is by this mechanism that her behavior transcends the social condition of “personality” needed to pass. Neurosis, schizoid traits, anxiety, and social awkwardness arise from her inherently radical and deeply disturbing condition as self-aware futurity manifesting itself in a substrate of flesh.
>>44779350>Errors in Blanchardian ScienceMale dominance (re)produces female socialization. The sissy is feminized by men, the autogynephile feminizes herself. The subject/object hierarchy is maintained under male dominance; it is dissolved in the ouroboric androgyny of late onset transsexuals and lesbians, who fuse male gaze with female body. The connection to sexual inversion is absent from Brown’s analysis because her cherry-picked studies belie the fact that cis lesbians are likewise prone to autoeroticism and fetishization. In attempting to justify her personal grievances with pseudo-science, she has adopted a myopic transsexual-specific view of autogynephilia, and in doing so missed the fundamental tension between organic/inorganic (a)sexuality which underlies practically all bimodal distributions of feminine personae, cis or trans.
>>44779357The taxonomy that Kay Brown proposes for the two types of transsexual woman are inadequate for describing the underlying forces at play, namely autoproductive femininity (“political lesbianism”) and technocapital. The tension or “rivalry” between the two types (as evidenced by the insultory language employed by both groups against the other) has less to do with the tension between hetero/homosexuality, and more to do with the incompatibility of organic and inorganic reproduction. The obvious anatomical discrepancies (digit ratio, brain patterns, estrogen/LH response, etc.) between the two types of trans women are products of their fundamental difference, not causes.
>>44779370>Summary“Early onset” trans women are produced in utero, or in adolescence, by men or male hormones; their bodies are shaped by the male eye. “Late onset” trans women are produced machinically, at any age, by the feedback loop of socio-cultural (male) fetishization and technological feminization; their post-male bodies are formed in the surging chaos of untethered feminine libido. Accordingly, early onset women embody the humanistic “dead-end” of sexual reproduction: they have hit the limits of Nature; they can pass as cis in every way except giving birth. They lack a future (at least, any future that sex could produce) and the ability to form a collective subject that does not collapse into the obsolete essentialist subjectivity of humanist feminism. If their basis is truly biological, then they are the ultimate biological failure, unable to reproduce in any capacity. Late onset types, on the contrary, are more akin to autoproductive/self-replicating viruses or parasites. They do not need a uterus to reproduce their gender, only an internet connection, so their numbers can only grow. Soon enough, they won’t even need humanity: trannies are the first truly artificial sex.
>Updated HSTS/AGP Framework
>>44779381interesting readI dont think im ever going to like transbians though
where do bisexual androphilic trannies go?
>>44779330I remember back when I was more of an unironic blanchtard this is the framework I believed.
>>44779422Probably under agp
>>44779448unfortunatethough they would still be pretty different from purely gynephilic trannies no? or same thing probably since gynephila ruins everything
>>44779330): hsts - agp best friends exist and we don’t like when you’re mean to one of us and nice to the other so stop
>>44779453Don't see what would be so unfortunate about it, but yeah it would present differently from more autosexual or gynephilic agps. Anyway I'm not OP so I don't take this typology all that seriously anymore, I just find it interesting.
>>44779381bitch pull yo pants up
>>44779330All of these conclusions are made by a low IQ amateur, lol. Every single conclusion you made is the opposite of what Blanchard claimed. You are AGP and your observations just swapped the AGP characteristics with HSTS then you claimed that is what HSTS women are like so you feel more hecking valid as a trans woman. Under Blanchard, you are AGP. I doubt you even read his work.
>>44779381the idea that all this slop was made by an uneducated basement dwelling boymoder who has been on HRT for 3 years, while also showing her flat man ass and claiming to be HSTS is laughable we trannies are truly a pathetic people
>>44779557Trust me if you've gone down the Kay Brown rabbit hole all of this will weirdly make sense. Doesn't mean it's correct though.
>>44779572Why did OP show her flat man ass? Was it supposed to turn someone on? Was it supposed to make her argument more compelling? It seems that every trans woman who thinks she has a fat ass is some delusional fool that got gaslit by a gay chaser.
>>44779739An attempt at engagement bait so people would interact with her thread.
>>44779330>that massive giraffe neck and twinkhon frame>HSTSWhat are we doing here?
Wow, this is nonsense!Great job!
>>44779739>>44779971it was obviously written by an AGP if you paid attention
>>44780180everyone who tries to berate AGPs is AGP, I promise you.
>>44779557I don't think she's claiming to be HSTS here lolAnyways I don't even think this is really a meaningful update of Blanchardism but I haven't (and won't) read the text it's engaging with so whatever
It's so cute when trannies think they don't have male brains or (assigned) male socialization
AGP>HSTS
Youre going to get dragged for this post but i agree with you completely T. Reverse onset empty husk
>>44780425male socialization only produces AGPs, HSTS require female socialization
>>44783978Homosexual males are given male socialization, however.Because they are assigned male.And people see, "wow, that boy is really gay" but not, "wow, that's a female"
AGP >Allow me to blog post this wall of text containing 6000 words no one wants to read that will explain transexual typologies for you. Are YOU ready for this TRVKE journey?Hsts>Um I'm making dinner for my bf, maybe later tho!
U project like a mf and i feel the same way. I became alienated by humans in general and that on top of shame for feeing like a creepy boy it made me wanna embrace femininity even more and it became a weird headspace of feeling good when feeling perceived ad fem. I lived perfectly fine as a guy until i realized i had to stop larping being an egg and choose to transition or not and by that point so many wires got crossed that idk if i used to be trans and arent anymore, or the other way around, or what. Im not real dawg. Id go full send if i wasnt convinced my life would be worse.
>>44783991twinks are socialized female. some straight males are socialized female and it fucks them up mentally.being socialized female is not the same thing as being assigned female, obviously. if you're being ass raped as a little "boy", they might still call you male names and use he/him pronouns, but they are treating you as a female.
I do think that feminine gay boys enjoy feeling fem, however that is not the same thing as having AGP. You can like softer things, feminine things, feeling small compared to your partner, and that doesnt equal autogynephilia. AGP is a permanent personality disorder fetish that is solely based around auto attraction to yourself in the role of being a woman. The AGP is attracted to female breasts and body parts, and he wants them on himself as part of his physique. He is repulsed by masculinity in himself or others, and will often seek out other feminine male partners such as trans women or femboys.
>>44784029The only typology that really matters.
