Trans people are objectively more intelligent than the general population because recognizing that you are trans is inherently an intelligence check. In order to be trans you must first deconstruct the very nature of gender itself as well as recognizing the feelings in yourself to be the opposite gender or to be nonbinary for what those feelings truly are. This is why transwomen are better than cis women and why transmen actually are men.
men are not women and you have to be retarded to believe chopping off your penis or not using your dick during sex make you femaletrans women are mentrans men are womentransgenderism is autistic people lying to others
>>44786439
>>44786431>you must first deconstruct the very nature of gender itselfthis is my trutrans litmus test. If you need to "deconstruct the nature of gender" to realize you're a tranny, then you're not a tranny in the first place. Or at the very least not a trutranny
>>44786460Semantics. Understanding that you can be a different gender from the one you were assigned at birth would be "deconstructing gender" in my eyes.
>>44786478yeah, and my point is that someone who is trutrans doesn't actually need to understand that they can be a different gender. They just are that gender
>>44786489Again, this is semantic bullshit. They were assigned to a gender when they were born which was incongruent with the gender that they actually are. So for them to not "understand that they can be a different gender [from what they were assigned at birth]", they either need to be unaware they were assigned an incorrect one, or not understand that the gender they actually are, is the gender they actually are.
>>44786431Nah my brain kept daydreaming that I had tits and eventually I answered the call.t. big naturals haver
>>44786540What about a child that instinctually proclaims to be their internal gender from the moment they become aware of the difference between genders? They didn't deconstruct anything, they just stated who they are
>>44786627it was pretty clear to me as a 5 year old gay boy that only girls were allowed to like boys and that I would have to keep those feelings to myself because I wasn't a girl
>>44786431I don’t think falling for the fujo psyop is a very strong mark of my intelligence
>>44786627Moving the goalpost. Refer to >>44786478 I reject the question on its premise that->They didn't deconstruct anything, they just stated who they areA child is told, from the moment they are born, what gender they're supposed to be. I *do* believe that going against what they were told in any way, regardless of how little time it took them to do it, is "deconstructing" gender, even if it's in a basic, surface level way.This is why I say it's a semantic argument, we fundamentally disagree on what "deconstructing gender" means and that fact was obvious from the start.
>>44786663I concede. Your argument are better and your definition of deconstruction more pragmatic. I'm just not trutrans myself, so I wanted to define my fakeness
Trans people are disproportionately crakkkers, middle class, and functional autists. Thats why trannies have disproportionally high IQ. If a zesty yung blud from the streets or cletus the swamp white could troon without getting hatecrimed to death your IQs would plummet. They would still be slightly higher than baseline owing to the disproportionate amount of functioning autists that would be in the community though. Vegetable type autists with tard IQs can't realistically troon out so they are filtered from the tranny population.
>>44786431>>44786663If it's a surface level deconstruction what's stopping cis people from having surface level deconstructions or even complex deconstructions of things in their life. Being told to follow gender norms inevitably leads to contradiction at some point just as having dysphoria does. The degree of suffering is irrelevant to if the problem actually gets deconstructed properly.You aren't describing anything special about trans people. We all deal with issues, that doesn't mean we deal with them intelligently.You're just focusing on a niche part of their experience while ignoring the complexities of others.I wouldn't give your claim credence for the same reason I wouldn't say any particular mental illness results in a higher IQ on average without conducting a study.There are too many variables in what causes gender and how it's dealt with. The claim is meaningless conjecture.
