[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lgbt/ - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: plum2.jpg (672 KB, 822x1114)
672 KB JPG
let's say you lived in a monarchy and there was a mandatory parade for all citizens, and the king had just returned from a long trip away to China, where he, reportedly had acquired beautiful new silk robes that he was going to be wearing and showing off at the parade, and you were specifically instructed to comment loudly on how stylish and elegant his new robes are.

You go to the parade, and the king finally strides past, there are no robes to be seen. He is naked as the day he is born. Yet, everyone is cheering and complimenting his ornate garments - that do not exist. Would you feel weird? Would you feel weird being crowd-shamed into praising the non-existent king's new clothes?
>>
Off topic, this should be in >>>/r9k/
>>
>>44791137
it's on topic, it's an apt metaphor for why people do not want to pretend that crossdressing men are "trans women"
>>
By which you mean straight men , meaning not LGBT. If you want to make an OP stating your political argument it belongs on >>>/pol/



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.