Is mentioning Harry Potter, what HP house you belong to, or having a HP related Halloween or cosplay photo in their dating profile a subtle and stealthy way of letting people know they don't date trans women since JK Rowling has become known as Voldemort of TERFs?
>>44796016there's no cis women here, don't be silly
>>44796020But there's a cis lesgen.
>>44796016Who cares if it's a stealthy way of saying it, or if they are interested in trans women but are just stupid?Here is a novel and creative idea: don't date them. If they weren't into trans women, not messaging or matching saves you time. If they are? Well, sucks for them; they can stay femcel lesbians for all I care. They don't deserve you.
>>44796034The one populated by 60% cis men, 30% larping trans women, and 10% larping trans men?
>>44796037>Who cares if it's a stealthy way of saying itI do.Sometimes I receive likes on dating apps from cis lesbians but they have Harry Potter stuff in their profile and I can't tell if they liked my profile by accident or not because I'm a manmoder and I just don't see how a cis lesbian can be attracted to a manmoder and call themselves a lesbian.
>>44796048How do you know this to be true?
>>44796016if they're not chronically online they probably just think it's a cute movie about wizards and goblins
>>44796067Who cares? There are better options. They aren't entitled to you.
>>44796068Well, two of their recent big users turned out to be men. And that's like 30% of their active user base.
>>44796067Is there no apps where non bio women get bannedI wish such would exist where they would not allow old grandpas and dickpic sendersif theres true lesbians here, is sending random vagina pics common to you and are they as overly focused on that sex stuffwith the HP stuff I also wondered very much when watching that Fantastic Beasts movie because I didn't knew Dumbledore way officially gayThat made me wonder even more after I read the author had confirmed that in 2007, so are they really anti LGBT or just against this tranny fake tolerance stuff
>>44796182>That made me wonder even more after I read the author had confirmed that in 2007, so are they really anti LGBT or just against this tranny fake tolerance stuffyou are fascinatingly stupid, more clueless than the average cis man
>>44796140>two of their recent big users turned out to be menThat sounds bogus.Why would, not one but multiple men, put that much effort into pretending to be cis lesbians on a dark corner of the internet?
>>44796182> If there are true lesbians here, is sending random vagina pics common to you, and are they as overly focused on that sex stuffHand pics. But usually it's after asking permission.> Just against this tranny fake tolerance stuffI can't speak for her stance on the LGBs, but she funds court cases and advertising campaigns against trans women. That's why all of us should avoid and cisles that have their Harry Potter interest front and center; for our own safety.It's not hard; we are worth more than that. Either way, it's not worth the risk. Note that no one told cis lesbians to avoid them; if you want to date someone like that, then have at it!Just don't expect me to want to hang out with you.
>>44796239They weren't outed; they admitted it. Cislesgen is talking about it as fact. IDK, I'm not going to ask them for clarification because that would require sullying their precious cis-AFAB-woman-only space with my transness.
>>44796380>They weren't outed; they admitted it.Then how do you know they aren't cis lesbians pretending to be men in cis lesgen to be "edgy" and get attention?
>>44796360I mean there was stuff like sueing the Deutsche Bahn for misgendering I would understand if someone fought that madness although it sounds tempting to just file for "discrimination" and receive free money because I identify as a radiodontIts just getting out of handThis whole Harry Potter fandom seems to exist generally I see it a lot on straight peoples profiles too just as this comic hero movie stuff.>>44796199No, I just don't care and waste time on researching such things
one interesting question i might have, is offering jobs as "m / w / x" or "m / w / d" or similar now common in your country?it always gives me full derealization and i wonder if this is worldwidei dont see how it gets any more acceptance of "diverse" people only more hatred from the "normal" majority
>>44796835>no i just dont care and waste time on researching such thingsright well the way you have better opinions is you put a little effort into thinking about themalso not the reason I called you stupid
>>44796403Good point. I don't know that this entire website isn't just one horribly overworked Russian agent arguing with one horribly overworked CIA agent.This sure is a good argument.
>>44796835Yeah, and if they care more about their fandom than trans people, then why should a trans person date or befriend them? Again. We are worth more than that. They are not entitled to us as partners or friends.
