Some people are attracted to androgyny and that's ok.
>>44796556Androgyny is the future. The one universal social constant is technology, which always improves. As it does, humans will be able to customize themselves even further, altering biological capabilities.In the future there will be no men or women, there will only be ambiguous twinks.
positive or negative?
>>44796556Need an androgynous partner whose gender i am not even sure about, but it would be too rude to ask
>>44796556Androgyny is only attractive when it's someone too beautiful to determine their gender. Androgyny when it's someone too ugly to gender either way is something nobody likes. What you're arguing is not androgyny, but lookism without the gender politics.
That's GAMP and it's not ok.
sexual dimorphism is a curse
I love trans bodies!!I love boobtwinks!
>>44797047>universal social constant is technology>which always improves
>>44797848>People are only attractive when I think they're beautiful
>>44796556Ethereally gorgeous people are almost always androgynous to some degree. So yes.>>44797250mostly negative, if they like positive it's usually leaning one direction (female, it's female)although, if you plug in your porn brain for a minute... I do think those drawings of muscular venus bodies (donaught, natedecock for example) they are sooort of dipping into positive androgyny, especially if it's futas. Like, it's still leaning more female but it's there.So in theory both are hot, in reality I've only seen negative be attractive.
