we did it, xisters
>>44959728bad game, gameplay loop bad
>>44959728I wouldnt play that garbage even for free
>>44959728It goes on these deep discounts all the time
Timmy gave it away for free, I always thought this franchise was for dorks, way before Robert started with his bullshit, it's super lame, kind of like disney channel shows.
>>44959740I got it for free months ago and haven't bothered to install it. There are just so many better games out there, like fallout 3, or bloons 6, or halo 1, or san andreas...
are you schizo perchance?
>>44960409literally, like i'm glad i got it for free and didn't have to let money go to Rowling, but i just have no desire to play it. been playing shit like The Division, Mordhau, Dark Souls 3, etc.
a pyrrhic victory. look at the state of the art (the "industry"). bungie doesn't exist. soft and sony compete to see who can make the worst, most film-derivative games possible, and people can't stop throwing money at them. ("$100 sportslop? bring it on, daddy-o")valve banned "horses" bc it has a chastity belt in it (too much for the chinese audience to handle?) techland has had over a decade to make ONE (1) good DL sequel and they couldn't fucking do it even if their punishment for failure were to be fed to their own volatiles. but i suppose i should just be grateful that fromsoft is making "the duskbloods"
>>44959728I already bought it>>44959740it's ok but the frame gen and dlss and overall performance is atrocious
>>44959728Cry harder, troon
I got this game for free on Epic but I still refuse to play it morally
>>44962161Same
>>44959728if your really wanted to play that game without giving jk rowling money you could have just pirated that shit this entire time
>>44959740I genuinely got it legit for free on Epic Games. Haven't played it myself lmao but I opened to the cutscenes and it went on too long idk
