those chaserbait whoreposts are actually the worst opticsnuke
>>44974384hsts bimbos aren't supposed to top wtf i'm shaking and crying rn
chasers deserve to bottom
>>44974657most of them do top. hsts does not equal woman
>>44974657HSTS bimbo is basically the ts top phenotype.>t. bottom chaser who's been railed by a number of them
>>44974833weve got the most high calibre brain geniuses on this website
>>44974865remember hsts equals hot woman and agp equals autistic male rapist
>>44974833>>44974840Why do they all top? I never understand. All that effort into being feminine yet they like topping?
>>44974895gay men are not straight women
>>44974913because gay males like using their dick on other men
>>44974913They're gay men
>>44974922All trans women are gay men.
>>44974915autist response sorry i should've put /s for you guys
>>44974934HSTS are gay men who pretend to be straight women, but they are actually just delusional gay male crossdressers, not actual women in neurology or any other sense.
>>44974946it's a low functioning one damn
>>44974956You cannot even reason with my statements at all. HSTS, the topic of discussion, claim to be women, and are sexualized by some men as if they were women, but they are, in reality, gay men playing a social game.
>>44974913>4840 hereThey are comfortable with being feminine so they don't need to prove anything by restricting themselves to one particular role. A lot of cis women have pegged me too, I'm sure they would be down to top if they grew dicks.
>>44975029alright you should read up on this word, your therapist probably told you about it once. it's called "sarcasm". it's when you say something you don't mean for comedic effect. maybe one day you'll find out how to recognize it out in the wild lil autist. people on the internet use a /s to help you guys out
>>44974913because they want to? are you really this fucking stupid?
>>44975086Do you agree that trans women are men?
>>44975217yeah you've been arguing with a wall. finally found it out damn
>>44975252ALL trans women are men?
>>44975267levels of autism never seen before, yes
>>44975270Wait, we have to go further.Do you agree that ALL XY chromosome bearers, even those with intersex conditions that do not allow them to process testosterone or experience the function of an SRY gene, are, to at least some degree, visibly male?
fag
>>44975287idk man i just know men are men. is this your special interest?
