Hey /lgbt/. Any advice on finding someone who would accept my sexuality?>Be me>A zoo taking a trans girl go on a date>All during and before the date hinting at my sexuality>Suggest looking at each other's profile shares to get a feel for each other(I have a post about the German zoo pride march near the top)>She asks him if I'm a furry>"No, I'm worse. Devil grin">"Like how worse?">"Like being gay in the 1950s worse.">"Blush hiding eyes">date's actually good>she's into it>we kiss>hands wander>she asks later why I don't just become a dog trainer>"it'd feel wrong. like those teachers who get busted later for doing something illegal.">"Drugs? Lol.">"No.">Talk about the dog all night>Later she says she's monogamous and the jealous type>"Lol will you be getting jelly when I cuddle and sleep with my dog?">"What no. That's a dog.">go watch Heart of the Beast together>date ends>Chilling at home I send her the zoo pride flag>ask her opinion>she doesn't recognize it>send her a link explaining it>"ooooh. that makes me kind of uncomfortable. Smile sweat drop"> ":( oh okay. I wish you were as accepting of me as I am of you miss.">block her>mfw the chemistry was real
>>45001809have you tried not being a fucking zoophile?
>Hey /lgbt/. Any advice on finding someone who would accept my sexuality?>zoo pride march
>>45001809have you considered killing yourself?
>>45001817I've tried praying to God but it just isn't going away. >>45001823I'm not trans. Why would I even consider that?
>>45001809if this is bait you need to try harder.if this is real you need to commit yourself to a phsych ward or walk into oncoming traffic
Zoophilia (and pedophilia for that matter) aren’t sexualities they’re paraphernalias. Indulging is a choice you immorally make. Go celibate if you have to, but you’re in the wrong if you sincerely believe it’s at all good.
>>45001809im sorry you're mentally ill. please continue repressing
>>45001809you should killed yourself. you are not lgbt. go to africa and try fucking a gorilla, i hope that it rips your head off, you sick fuck
modern gays really have no understanding of how bad it was in earlier decades huh. no empathy for others with different desires once their sexuality goes mainstream. crazy days we live in
>>45001858>If this is bait>If this is real Choose one lane. >>45001864I'm a zoosexual. >>45001949They said that in the 1950s to gays too. >>45001970There was a zookeeper recently who got fired when it came out she gave oral to a gorilla every day.
>>45002162no one fucking cares, dog rapist
>>45002167I'm not a rapist
>>45002162>They said that in the 1950s to gaysim gay and im telling it to you. we'll still be telling it to you in 2050.
>>45001809i think fucking animals is bad
>>45001809please don't come here again
>>45001809yeskill yourself violently i'm sure there's someone in hell who would accept you while you BURN FOR FUCKING ETERNITY YOU'RE MORE FUCKED THAN MEi would recommend beating yourself with a rock until you fall unconscious and then pay someone to continue until you're deadthank you please never come back
>>45002256Maybe, maybe not. In ancient rome and greece both of those was acceptable. >>45002379I want to have children one day and have a mother who will raise them with me. I can't do that if I'm dead.
>>45001809I thought that was some kind of musical note sexuality
>>45002574Nope it's a z. It stands for Zoosexual.
>>45002162>They said that in the 1950s to gays too.Funny Denmark did legalize sodomy and zoophilia at the same time in 1930.
Try asking the straight guys over on MLP.
>>45002162you trying to rename is a sexuality does not redefine it from a paraphernalia. Animals can not consent, you’re abusive if you ever indulge and should be locked up if true. Stop trying to deceive people that it’s somehow consensual or not abusive.
>>45002574>>45003976It's a Zeta actually
>>45004316If animals can't consent should we prevent them from having sex with each other since it's all rape?
>>45004284We pretend straight men didn't openly indulge in bestiality porn fantasies from.a kid's show for a decade.
>>45004331You having the minimum level of intellect to understand the vast difference between species biology, behavior, and instincts compared to humans is what makes it immoral. Animals lack this understanding and for better or for worse are separated from anything sort of equal rights to that of humans: what they do amongst themselves is understood as the result from restrictions from lacking self-awareness. You trying to word rape definitions isn’t going to change this. You are unironically mentally ill for justifying your perversion and need to seek help, not indulge in abusive and rape behavior.
>>45004452>Animals lack this understanding and for better or for worse are separated from anything sort of equal rights to that of humans: what they do amongst themselves is understood as the result from restrictions from lacking self-awareness.So why does their hypothetical anthropomorphize consent matter? >perversionsoh I thought this was about consent.
Imma be real kill yourself, yes I am a bigot against dog rapists, yes I will continue to help dox people who rape animals, yes I hope that more people out there recognize who you are and as such and never hire you, if you’re self employed I hope that nobody patronizes your business, I hope that people like you get terminal cancer like Douglas Spink and will be a note of degeneracy in history. You are a rapist and an animal abuser and deserve nothing in this world than the worst it has to offer. There is no counter point, I hope all of you animal fuckers have a horrible and painful life
100% unironically you need to fucking off yourself
>>45004592But how does this affect you personally?
glad to see the shitfuck hatetorment washing machine of doom that is this board agreeing on something for once *clap*any for totally unrelated reasons is anyone willing to teach me how to perform chinese water torture?
>>45004684kinda brings a tear to my eye to see a board as tribalistic and bitter as /lgbt/ come together to tell this animal abuser to kill themselves maybe we're all gonna be ok
>>45001809if you fuck dogs then why are you going on dates with humans?? doesn’t that just illegitimize your claims of it being a sexuality? retard dog rapist
>>45001809commit yourself to a mental institution
do you all have to keep bumping this shit thread
>>45004250Nice>>45004316Okay homophile >>45004331Lmao yes>>45004452>Durr it's different because we're enlightened unlike animals. Sounds like something a christcuck would say. >>45004684A good few of the pro-zoosexual replies aren't from me. >>45004920Because I want to have children and a partner to raise them one day. >doesn’t that just illegitimize your claims of it being a sexuality?Let's ask the monogamous married bis that question.
> ":( oh okay. I wish you were as accepting of me as I am of you miss."One of you wants to fuck a dog.The other just wants to alter their appearance for their comfort and self expression.
>>45005781do not reproduce. your hypothetical children don’t deserve to be cursed with your disease
>>45005781In no way am I a zooBut picrel always does give me pause How can you argue that a male animal mounting a human of their own volition is abuse? Not discounting that there are situations where animals can be sexually abused, obviously that is true and probably the norm, but it does seem like there is room for a >healthy relationship
>>45001864Seconded. Certain sexual acts cannot happen within reasonable constraints of consent. If we believe rape is inherently wrong we need to reject pedophilia, and create arbitrary rules that draw clear definitions of that act. We cannot incorporate apologists for non-consensual sexual acts under the umbrella of queer identities without deeply compromising the moral and social justifications that have won queer people their rights and freedoms. Similarly zoophilia and bestiality are not acts that can reasonably occur with the consent of the animal. Whereas animals are not people, and I don't believe that the consequences and implications are really comparable, it is still an act of abuse that can easily be considered inhumane. We believe that people of varying sexual orientations and identities have rights to do as they please primarily because it is not the business of society what CONSENTING ADULTS do in the privacy of their homes.
>>45006455The problem is largely that of a precedence based legal system. Slippery slope is not a fallacy when unrelated legal cases can be used to progress obviously immoral behaviour. Who's to say what counts as voluntary mounting? Why can a woman or receptive partner fuck their dog but I can't? What if my dog's in heat? Where's the cutoff for a substantially small or large dog that allows me to fuck said dog? What about other animals, and how is that regulated? How was the animal motivated to mount; was it deceptive and does that count as abusive? Who the FUCK is checking all of this? The problem is that as soon as it's legal in any aspect it has to be fully defined and regulated, you're asking normal people to look deep into your sexuality and make legal frameworks on how it is to be performed. We don't need most of this shit with people because they can talk and express when and how they were abused, which an animal never can, which is why animals need to be protected in these cases. You could compare the meat industry but it is worth noting that there is a massive legal framework for humane slaughter and animal rearing.
>>45007672It's not about legalizing it it's about decriminalizing it. Animal abuse is already punished under the law. If there was animal abuse involved in the act then it would be punished. Sure a few animals will get raped in secret, but as is the nature of a innocential proven guilty system, this would be acceptable. Besides it's already nearly impossible to tell if an animal has been having illegal intercourse with a human, especially if said human is a veterinarian or a breeder who has legal reasons why they would have sexual interactions will said animal.
>>45007809These are non-sequiturs and you are moving the goal posts. A doctor doing urological examinations or a colonoscopy or artificial insemination IS NOT THE SAME as them poking around with someone's genitals for their own sexual gratification. similarly, veterinary work that involves the genitals of an animal is also not bestiality. By definition having sex with an animal IS considered abuse by many existing legal frameworks and is punished similarly. The ethical justifications for decriminalization are because we believe that the crime is used by justice systems to unduly punish disadvantaged groups for victim-less crimes, especially when the punishment far exceeds the offense and creates social stress that exceeds the cost to benefit ratio. We as a society believe that animals do have some rights and therefore can be victims of criminal abuse and neglect. Therefore decriminalization is off the table because it only normalizes undesirable behaviour without alleviating social stress caused by the legal system. You're essentially arguing for the rights of a small group of people over the protection of animals at a societal level.
>>45007809>>45008187And then what? Do you believe you should only be fined for it? Do you believe that if no one knows it stops being immoral/unethical? Do you think there's already some inspector police squad that roams around checking dog assholes to see if they've been recently raped and that they're infringing on your rights? The reality is that your take is fucking unhinged and anyone would be perfectly sane to kick you to the curb when they found out you're an animal fucker. Furthermore, the use of a zoophile pride flag is a joke, and a bad one at that. Your stance is massively regressive and extremely hurtful to queer people everywhere. If I didn't actually know that 4chan is the kind of cess pit that spawns dipshits like you I would believe that you are a three letter psy-op intentionally sent to discredit queer communities.
>>45001809the walls are your canvas and the shotgun your brush. get painting
>>45008187>moving the goal posts.Show me where I set a goal post. >doctor doing urological examinations or a colonoscopy or artificial insemination IS NOT THE SAME as them poking around with someone's genitals for their own sexual gratification. So it's fine if said vet jerks off while performing these? Assuming that there's risk of injurying the dog and the procedure won't become compromised that is. Currently it is illegal for a vet to do that in most states. >By definition having sex with an animal IS considered abuse by many existing legal frameworks and is punished similarly.No it's not. They couldn't prosecute the friends of Mr. Hands over animal sex. >essentially arguing for the rights of a small group of people over the protection of animalsYes. Humanity first. :^) >And then what? Do you believe you should only be fined for it?Wood chipper for all the actual convicted rapists. >Do you think there's already some inspector police squad that roams around checking dog assholes to see if they've been recently raped and that they're infringing on your rights?No. But I do think they send them to a vet to see if the dog has human DNA on his knot. I don't like the idea of the government getting into my business when nobody and no animal is getting hurt.
