If you suffer from gender dysphoria and possess a physiology that makes it impossible for you to pass as a woman, it is your responsibility to take on the role of a man as your painful penance and bear it with courage. Consider the next:>the movement doesn't needs another hon ruining optics>You should make the most of your masculine strength; in the event of a revolution or conflict, we need capable and strong men willing to die>in tandem with the last point, trans women will always make good use of strong men with the courage to protect themDon't make a mockery of yourself! Help others to live the life you wish you could have; don't fall to chuddism, protect the rights of the oppressed; black, gay, brown, muslim or working-class, fight for them and make good use of your strenght. I've accepted this as my destiny, and so should you
>>45038791I'd rather wallow in my misery and drink myself into a coma.
>>45038791Too late I already joined the ranks of the manmoders as a part time public honMy skull is gargantuan
>>45038791No. I'm tired being a sacrificial lamb to a society that does not give one single fuck about me, yet still demands my slave labor. Yet still feels entitled to my being. Fuck all of you pieces of shit. I didn't sign up to be seen as a rapemonster/cannon fodder/thing with invalid emotions, much like women who didn't sign up to being treated like sex objects instead of human beings. Civilization is the true origin of corruption not only for this species but for all ills that befall the world.
>>45038791The good comrade Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov would never had spread such idealist and, indeed, liberal nonsense. Moreover, Hons highten the contradiction and thus help bring about the conditions of collapse
>>45038866>what a real bolshevik would do is castrating themselves and become eternally dependent on man-made hormones, and therefore on capitalistic entitiesLenin would tell you to stop being a faggot and man up for the revolution, to be honest.
>>45038882Idealisim and liberalisim again. Maybe crack a book?
>>45038882you have no clue what you're talking about. this line of thought is pervasive even among so-called progressives, but the fact is that you cannot separate yourself from the process of production. you are entirely dependent upon industrial processes for every single thing you need to survive, and it is pure idealism to pretend that you can excise yourself from society and be economically independent. this is precisely why communists seek to seize the means of production rather than abolish them. you cannot turn back the wheel of time to pre-industry, and to believe you can is the essence of reactionary thought.
>>45039164What if we just fenced off a big chunk of land where you can go live like a hunter gatherer or a medieval farmer
>>45039429> what if we just> weQuestion presupposes industrialized society maintaining the enclosure
