i am sick and tired of being called a tranny just because i enjoy feminine things as a man. you people think it's a joke but i am genuinely offended by this 'boys play with soldiers, girls play with dolls' mentality everyone has. It's very reductive and only reinforces the idea that you have to be W or X in order to enjoy Y and Z, aka bioessentalism
>>45200883tranny
you're just asking for it
>I don't care but I actually care a lotJust like stop caring
just troon out and become a pretty girl
>>45200883stage 1 the nile
Don't hear other people and just be yourself. You look pretty on that dress tho!
>>45200891im aware that it might sound that way but i assure you it's far from the case because this shit has been bothering me all week>>45200897and become one of you? no thanks>>45200922>>45200927im already on hrt, fuck off>inb4 taking estrogen means yuore a tranny!!!!!!!!!have you ever considered that some men just want to look pretty and have better skin and hair? if anything, im closer to an otokonoko or cmoe than a tranny. i am a man who took control of apollo's chariot and drove that fucker right back across the sky>>45200930other people are too loud to ignore atp and i can't just stand around while they slander my identity
>>45200995stage 2 mesopotamia
>>45200995>and become one of you? no thanksYou wish, bitch, now take your sissy ass out of my face and stop replying to me.
>>45200995Why would that even bother you if you're so confident in your maleness
If you didn't give a shit you wouldn't be making a thread about it.
>>45200883>>45200995I strongly agree and I'm a fem tranny. I despise other trannies pushing people to become trannies. Let people figure things out on there own.>>45201430Eh let people complain.
>>45200883>>45201430giwtwm
It's hard to be pretty as a male, people don't welcome that
GAY ANIME SISSY THREAD
>>45201072fag>>45201257>>45201430it bothers me because people WONT STOP SAYING IT. i can handle the off-hand remark, i can handle the occasional tease or joke, and even call myself a she/her cis man. but what i CAN'T handle is people constantly repeating it ad nauseam. it gets boring and stale after a while>>45201443THANK YOU. i genuinely don't see myself as a tranny and have a hard time relating to them most of the time>>45202073trooke, i just want to play dress up
>>45200883You can also be a femtranny and play with HOT WHEELS and fuckin MONSTER TRUCKS!!!
Trannyism is kinda funny if you view it as a return to bioessentialism during a time when feminism was trying to make a case for girls wearing jeans and boys playing with Barbie lol. So people basically just rejected the spectrum and told the gay boys to put on makeup and for gay girls to bind their chests LMAO.
>>45203426too crass and messy ,, eugh
>>45203414You are literally a sissy, why do you feel offended
>>45200883>by this 'boys play with soldiers, girls play with dolls' mentality everyone hasgood news, trannies hate this shit too. take my hand twinkanon weve gotta kill people.
>>45200883I don't see a way around this without a scientific analysis on gays. We know there's no gay gene, that was floated as fact by a feminist in the 90s and disproven by scientists also in the 90s. But clearly you're expressing female gender but you identify as men. Thinking like a scientist, I would say we should study gay people because we have a lot of science on trans people but not much on gay people. And no they're not trannies. Every time society tries to tell them this they transition then detransition and we get shit for it. Let them be gay. We just need to figure out why they're gay. It does break society's brain. These are factually women things you like. Choosing to dilute the definition just harms you and everyone else tho you as a man think it makes sense, look outside you by the numbers. Girls like dolls and boys soldiers. There is gender it's not a social construct it's based on sex and the social roles of those sexes like women being home bodies because pregnancy. This isn't social it's biological. So we need to figure out why you objectively like girl stuff but you're a boy not a girl. It's probably in your brain like us just different.
>>45200883youre dumb retarded tranny, stop letting things get to you and go enjoy your feminine things, you dumb faggot
>>45205058>It does break society's brain. These are factually women things you like. Choosing to dilute the definition just harms you and everyone else tho you as a man think it makes sense, look outside you by the numbers. Girls like dolls and boys soldiers. There is gender it's not a social construct it's based on sex and the social roles of those sexes like women being home bodies because pregnancy. This isn't social it's biological. So we need to figure out why you objectively like girl stuff but you're a boy not a girl. It's probably in your brain like us just different.honscience slop
>>45203414Because there's a contradiction between your experience and ours. And ours relates to heterocis norms (women are women and like women things) so they too are confused when you say you're a guy who likes women things and those things aren't women's things they're "just things". I don't think you're lying, but I don't know why you're like this. There isn't much data
>>45203486dysphoria
>>45205087Address the points or fuck off
>>45205058i think this is more about social dynamics then genes or what not. a lot of animals perform same-sex acts, sometimes out of necessity to show dominance, or to increase the bond within the group, sometimes because there are no other options and they do need a "partner" as well. its the same throughout human history too. male-to-male courtship and sex was not as much of a taboo back in the ancient times. in fact, it was seen as part of a bonding ritual to increase the comradeship between soldiers etc. it was also sometimes used as a means to show dominance, to break the psyche or whatnot. so i wouldn't call it purely biological, it definitely has a social aspect to it. but you can argue, it is our biology that affects our social acts. then one can argue that your biology evolved due to your social needs too, throughout the years.
Why are you gey? You are gey. You are not transgendar xdSorry just having a little fun with the situation
>>45205181It hasn't tho. 2026 penises and vaginas are the same as they were when they wrote the bible, excluding what jewish practices and south Africa do to babies. If it's not physiological and just social then it's simply misunderstanding gender (thinking anyone naturally likes wearing dresses, when that was invented for easy access for sex and urination/defacation the same the fanny flap and zipper for example)
>>45205291dont understand what you are trying to say but what i basically wrote was that this is a chicken and egg problem. gender is a social construct that also interfaces with biological reality. biological reality indicates there are two reproductive organs in humans clearly separated by the biological genders. but humans are also very complex animals that may or may not choose to use those biological organs for other purposes, depending on their social standing, desires, psychological condition and many more. so its not simply "there are two biological genders", its definitely more complicated.
>>45205122You implicitly assume naturalism and use pseudoscientific language to make normative claims ("Choosing to dilute the definition just harms you and everyone else") on that basis.Statistical averages may be a starting point for typologies, social identifications, behavioural norms, but they are not the final word. It's a philosophical choice to privilege the "default" or "simplest" position for these, and then leverage that to claim this is how things "ought" to be described in language and society.But we can observe how language and patterns of thoughts in turn influence human behaviour, and consciously and actively decide to change language and thought. We have decades of experience showing that drawing the categories of sex and gender around these statistical means/medians/modes/whatever inevitably leans to the alienation of the statistical margins, causing real suffering that I think is valuable to prevent.It is by diluting and dissolving the definitions of these categories (again, BOTH sex and gender) that causes human freedom to flourish in a way that I believe (philosophically) is valuable.Does knowing the mechanism that explains why some people fall on the statistical margins matter? It's interesting, sure. Perhaps it's rhetorically useful, especially if you're already a fan of using naturalism and pseudoscientific language as your rhetorical style. But naturalism is fundamentally a poisoned tree that has been used to oppress gender non-conforming or gender transitioning communities for centuries or longer. I think it warrants asking what happens if you get your answer? What happens if it's not the answer with outcomes that you like?
>>45200883>feminine thingsThat doll costume isn't feminine. It's childish.
>>45205661Cope and seethe, granny
>>45200883Get over it lolIm a local drag star and I get called she when im in drag and sir when I'm not. Im in my early 40s and regularly fuck 18-19yr trans girls.
>>45205901>i make a mockery of transgender women and have sex with them when they're barely legal and less than half my ageyuck
>>45206013nta but how are drag queens a mockery of trans women?
>>45200883just enjoy stuff brah. caring what others think is making you miserable
>>45206051gay anime sissies i tell you
>>45200883You're meant to resolve that inner conflict by taking a wife and caring for her.
>>45207371cismoid should start wearing dresses too
>>45207790Trvke
>>45200883twitter trannies see tgirls as twinks so ofc theyll see other fem men as tgirls
