Japan's government was femboys breeding femboys.From ~800-1930 they used to dress the boys of high ranking (!) families (majors, administrators, samurai generals) as girls and dicked them. Not as a dirty secret - everyone knew. They were paraded around in town. It was official law.They made art about it. They wrote on scrolls how to prepare these boys for their first sex (warming oils, lube, small dildos, repeatedly asking them if they feel comfortable). They were legally required to give ass and suck dick - but in these scrolls they wrote that some gave ass to monks they didn't have to.This happened in buddhist temples (they stored lube and dildos in buddhist temples, and had gay orgies in them. And this was official law). And the most elite families sent their boys to these buddhist temples.That was historically japan's government: A high IQ, high trust, very cute society. it's the cutest country on earth - no surprise - it was literally femboys breeding femboys. You can read it on wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChigoOr in museums: https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_2013-3001-1
Pedo thread.
>>45303962They were underage, i do not want to support that.But: their country did not fall apart. Despite that the government was literally femboys breeding more femboys
>>45303962It's a historical fact.Just like the greek used to bang boys. The greek were also a warrior society, just like Japan. The Samurai were warrior nobility.Talking about history is not pro-pedophilia. And i'm not interested in the underage aspect - but more about the fact that Japan is a great country, beloved by liberals and conservatives alike. It's both: very liberal, and very conservative. It's sexually liberal (say, shibari is an art form and historically they had small sized harmes) and politically conservative (nationalistic, stoic warrior nobility).
>>45303962But speaking of pedophilia, Christians who are openly against gay sex, sodomy - they made a lot of questionable art.Like this one, were an Infant (!!!) is drawn and painted with the plump ass of an adult woman. And if you were to listen to Christians, you'd think that gay sex would destroy society. And that's why i want to talk about japan in comparision. Not because i'm in favor of underage sex - but because Japan was such an extreme example of a gay (bisexual) society. They made the dicking of government officials MANDATORY and wrote that in law.
Like here is a painting called "The rape of Ganymede" by Rembrandt. This was painted 100 years after a pope was accused of letting a boy sleep in his bedroom others nicknamed ganymede.Ganymede in this painting is estimated to be 2-4 years old. That's significantly younger than what happened over in japan.
>>45304009That is very obviously different to what they drew and painted over in japan. In japan they made manuals on how to have analsex which doesn't hurt. Repeatedly asking the bottom if he's comfortable etc. - and then they made art about monks running gay trains on these young men. And this was official. It wasn't the boys of commoners or peasants either.You can tell that in comparison to a bunch of european art - that young man (unfortunately still underage) looks significantly older. Japan never condemned analsex. They outright celebrated it. And their country did not fall apart.
In comparison, over in europe they made a lot of questionable art of boys (FAR YOUNGER) - and if you questioned it, they just claimed it isn't what it looks like.These paintings are considered socially acceptable and classy, you can hang them up in churches or mansions. They are not perceived as the nightmare fuel which they actually are.
These femboys later in life became stoic warriors. Samurai. Granted, not all became Samurai, some became Buddhist monks or administrators. But most ended up in very high ranking government positions.They were married of usually, and some acquired small harems - everyone in town sorta knew that their politicians were dicked. When they married, they sucked more dick than their wife. That was literally a big chunk of Japans government.Based on everything conservatives tell you, this shouldn't work out. Instead it worked out spendidly. It's the cutest country on earth (kawaii), it's people are considerate and polite. They are technologically advanced due to their high IQ.And in fact, many conservatives like and praise Japan, because it has such an emphasize on family values, nationalism and warrior nobility.Yet that was literally femboy island.
Their politicians were known to commit ritualistic suicide (seppuku) if they did something wrong.You find this even among their criminals - the Yakuza amputate their fingers if they do wrong.This amount of accountability and transparency is noticeable through their entire society, from very high ranking all the way to their criminals.And it was mostly femboys.
Modern day humans hate looking at facts. Don't even bother educating them.
>>45304043That’s because the “homosexuality = liberalism” equation only makes sense in a society that previously forbade homosexuality. There’s nothing intrinsically “sexually liberal” about homosexuality if homosexuality IS the tradition
Europe on the other hand made a lot of really fucked up art involving children.And catholic schools were ripe with abuse of children. Including sexual.In comparison to your average catholic school, these buddhist temples (despite being run like gay sex clubs) were incredibly nice.
>>45304063That's true. That said, their women are also different. Shibari originated in japan, eventually became a socially accepted art form. They turned BDSM bondage into art. And they used to have concubines and small harems throughout history (owned by former femboys).That's very different from most other places. Japan has to be the least prude place on earth.
This tiny island is creating so much culture, it's almost rivaling Hollywood.Pac-Man. Nintendo - Zelda, Mario, Kirby... pokemon. Son Goku, Studio Ghibli. Sonic. Hello Kitty. Anime after anime. Lots of music too! Oh and so much hentai and porn games.In comparison, i struggle to think of a single (!) fictional character made in the middle east in recent years. Yet these people are prudes who condemn homosexuality and analsex and are firmly convinced that this makes them superior.
>>45304104Middle East used to be homo. That’s when they made worthwhile stuff like the Arabian Nights and the Rubaiyat
Meanwhile - europe painted stuff like this right here. While depriving young adult men - both hetero and gay/bi - of sex, condemning their sexuality. They were prudes after all.At the peak of Christianity, we had sodomy laws. You could end up in jail for receiving a blowjob. Even if it was a heterosexual blowjob.
It's worthwhile to really think about how the art during Christian era involving children came to be. These boys had mothers and family members. Women in art class were told to not pose certain ways, for it'd be inappropriate. Yet they saw no issue seeing their boys painted or exposed in such poses.
bring back pederasty
Meanwhile, in japan they painted how they prepare these boys with warming oils.Yes, they were underage teenagers. But at least they weren't infants, unlike in those paintings they made over in Christian europe. And they weren't shamed!!! They were outright paraded around in town, dressed as girls - They were never given a reason to be ashamed of this.
And later in life they still became respectable warriors.Perhaps that's because they weren't transitioned! They got to live out what was possibly a natural inclination, at least in some of them.And then they were gently taught how to become family fathers and warriors.
Imagine being a pure virgin traditional Spanish priest and the first thing you see when you hop off the boat after a 3 month journey is a japanese femboy flaunting his stuff.
We do the opposite here. Men who lived a "normal" life, possibly even family fathers - later in life transition, cause they have some inclinations or fantasies they haven't lived out.Obviously you can do this with boys who aren't that young. Just give them some opportunities to live out their natural inclination if they have one and are old enough - but also teach them to become respectable family fathers and have children.Instead we either shame them out of it, or we transition children who haven't even entered puberty yet, which drastically reduces the odds of them having children later in life. Japan did the polar opposite - it actively bred those boys. It gave them harems.
Leftists will oppose this because Western leftism is basically just Christian ethics
Despite dressing them up as girls and dicking them in-between math lessons: the Buddhists also gave them opportunities to be boys. To be masculine.They taught them martial arts. Turned them into men.
Many buddhists look more athletic and manly than christian priests.Despite Christian conservatives caring so very much about what is manly and unmanly. That's one of their favorite topics. It doesn't appear to be much of a topic among buddhists. They seem to not care.Japan was historically buddhist (despite kinda ignoring most official rules of buddhism and just making up their own!) - they have no issue being girly, cute and kawaii.It seems like asians are naturally slightly less muscular than whites, but that's something Christianity can take credit for.
*not something it can take credit for.If i had to guess, it's because the ancestors of whites used to be vikings who spend a lot of time raiding their neighbors and taking slaves. They were sorta constantly at war.Perhaps Christianity deserves credit for taming them. Must've been very unpleasant neighbors before that.
The greeks were very much known for homosexuality. If you look at greek art - they look incredibly muscular!!! Very manly.In a modern day gym, they would stand out. Ok, sure. Not compared to the guy who takes steroids. But they'd be some of the most muscular men if they walked into a modern day gym.... and some of these vases are literally titled "all male gay sex orgy".Christians and other prudes care a great deal about what is manly. Yet - your average Christian priest or conservative doesn't look like this.I personally think gay and bisexual men would be so much better off they were told to lift weights. They could still have a phase were they are femboys taking lots of dicks dressed as a girl - but maybe a teacher should tell them to do some martial arts, to smash some bricks. And perhaps later in life find a woman if they got tired of dick or feel old.That's what japan did.
Being kinky and openly sexual is immediately recognizable as stereotypically white and Japanese. It's unique to these people.In the case of the Japanese, well i think that can obviously be traced back to them breeding femboys for generations. In the case of white people, my guess is vikings. The viking population was 10-25% slaves (including children and the elderly!). Among the adult population, every other person was a slave. A decent chunk of which sex slaves.They sold (and kept) sex slaves.Kinda sadistic i suppose. But also very kinky - the opposite of being prude. Merchants travelling to vikings saw vikings have public group sex with slaves.
>>45303961The Japanese have always been based
>>45304357>It's unique to these people.But it didn't used to be historically. Indians made sex temples. Filled to the brim with art. These sculptures were amazing. They used joints which required precision within 6mm and once locked in, couldn't be removed.They didn't use any slaves in the building of these temples. They had a caste system, but no cattle slaves like rome. And when they were still openly sexual, they made lots of art. < they were wealthy enough, to afford MULTIPLE artisan craftsmen to build decorative temples all about sex.By the way, the last 600 years india has been ruled by muslims. People with a very prude world view.
If you look at these indian sex temples, it feels like anime used to be real once.A single sculpture took weeks to MONTHS. And it's entire walls filled with them. Massive time and skill investment. Only a functional and wealthy country can afford to do this.
And yet, these sex temples feel less degenerate than Christian era art.It seems to me that societies are far better off being transparent about sex and celebrating it. Seems like it leads to artistry and talent.In many ways it feels much healthier than all these highly questionable paintings were everyone pretends it isn't what it so very obviously is.
Speaking of transparency:Many rich people today are monogamous. Yet they live in mansions with multiple cars. Possibly multiple bathrooms and bedrooms.Yet we all pretend they only bed one woman at a time.In japan rich, and influential people impregnated multiple women at once. The average guy was monogamously married, but the top 1% weren't. And if they took concubines, ALL children were legitimate.Not even some guys who got randomly rich via bitcoin tried to impregnate multiple women with that money in our society. That seems very unusual if you think about it.
In a culture wherein monogamy is strictly enforced, it's very easy to blackmail men. Example:A wife gives her husband permission to sleep with her best girlfriend. She actively encourages him - tells him her girlfriend is into him, she saw a porn video with a guy who looked just like him and her girlfriend, and it was so masculine and it turned her on so much....And later she claims she never game him this permission. Suddenly she cats like a chaste, modest and prude wife. Just like that, a guy can be blackmailed.And women are more prone to play social games than men. If one of them found an easy way to get a husband to go along with certain things, they would all encourage each other to do the same. By the way: Religion is kinda a social game.
Isn't it unbelievable that there weren't at least a few bitcoin millionaires who tried to make anime real and live with multiple women?The japanese samurai did. They had small sized harems.In the middle east they had mega harems, guarded by enuchs....You'd think some at least some rich guys would just invite 5 random women working at starbucks to live in his mansion.The japanese were incredibly transparent about everything. Be it rich men sleeping with more than women, or trains run on boys. They didn't keep secrets.
A core Christian myth is a woman telling everyone she got pregnant without ever having had sex. Still being a virgin.That is opposite of transparency.
There's multiple Christian transvestite Saints. Saint Wilgefortis is a Christian Saint - a "woman" with a beard, gifted by god to avoid marriage..."She" looks like Steven Crowder dressing up. Feels very Christian.Anyway, in parts of Europe Saint Wilgefortis was more popular than Virgin Mary. Can you believe that?
Here's a Christian Tranvestite who's canon and officially recognized both Catholic and Orthodox. What makes her a Saint is that she never had sex. Despite being a woman pretending to be a man, living in an all male monastery. Were she's surrounded by highly educated men all day. And she kept living in the same bedroom as her father...All these Christian Saints have highly suspicious backgrounds. Like - there's one who was accused of raping her Sister. She acquired Sainthood, because she remained a virgin all her life.One could almost get the impression that religion is all about blackmail, and kinda very favorable towards women. Who take great joy in destroying the sex life of young men. May also explain why circumcision continues to be a thing.
"Turns on the familiar theme of a girl putting on male attire and living for many years undiscovered" <- that's written on wikipedia. About a Christian transvestite Saint.FAMILIAR THEME - of a girl pretending to be a man. It sounds like a joke.But there's in fact indeed multiple Christians saints just like that. The more you look into religion, and then you look at the art they made... it's a bunch of people blackmailing others and playing dumb. And despite pretending to be a patriarchy, it's mostly run by women.The biggest prevention of blackmail is ruthless transparency. Just being 100% transparent about everything. Be it adultery or your religious people having gay sex orgies.That was japan. They made all this stuff just legal, and wrote it down in scrolls.
>>45304376>the last 600 years india has been ruled by muslimsWut
There's so much questionable art made during the Christian era.You realize how much power sodomy laws give to women? If you can be jailed for having received a blowjob from a woman - once a woman levies an accusation, who wouldn't easily believe that a guy asked her to take his dick in her mouth? Everyone would.It's so obvious that this stuff used for selective enforcement. And the people who desire selective enforcement are people who seek to blackmail others. Imagine that's lowkey religion in a nutshell.
>>45304597Google it. Actually i just googled it, and the Google ai answers that it's an oversimplification. But a simplification doesn't mean it's wrong. To my knowledge, large parts of india became very prude. Like: they frown upon public kissing and hand holding even. That's obviously very different from the people who wrote the Kamasutra and build these decorative, massive sex temples.
By the way, when you look at vikings - can you see how some of their descendants became furries?Furries are very kinky. I think it's reasonable to conclude that's what vikings must've been like. Because it isn't Christian.A reminder that Africa is 41% Christian and that Christianity emerged out of the middle east. Yet you don't see furries in other countries.But furries feel very much white.
>>45304655Looking at what is sorta a muscular furry, i wonder how much better off gay and bisexual men would be, if they were encouraged to lift weights. Like: still let them suck dick or dress like a girl and take dick... but also encourage them to lift weights.And then they can settle in old age, maybe start a family. Again: that was a large portion of Japan's government.But also kinda greece. All three were warriors. And quite good at warfare at their peek. Japan is kinda the funniest one, because it was so systemic (literally mandated by law) - and it wasn't just gay, it was femboys. (dressed as girls = femboy)And then it makes just so much sense that it's the cutest, most considerate country on earth.
Here's a really funny challenge:Try to find a painting of a ~1500 Brothel. And the challenge is, that it must look more erotic than the way Christians painted children. It's impossible.
>>45304707Imagine one of the LEAST erotic places in your town is the brothel. (that in itself is funny)And then you visit the most PRUDE place in your town (it's the tallest building) - and it's filled with art of people who are half naked, in bondage and in pain. And furthermore it's filled with paintings of children who are suspiciously naked, posed in ways which the prudes consider inappropriate for adult women....It's like a fucking joke.
>>45303961>AI slop>Le femboy culture o algoSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
>>45304742Ai is useful to communicate something. Take this here. Just taking paintings made in the Christian era, and asking to swap the sexes - it does reveal something.
>>45304767Good morning saar!
>>45304767>>45304730>>45304776But you can comfirm it by reading feminist literature. I own multiple feminist books wherein women write how erotic Jesus Christ is. Because he's an almost naked man, usually depicted as very attractive. He's in bondage and in pain. Despite prudes pretending so much otherwise, women find this erotic.Ai slop is quite useful to look at these paintings as if you were the opposite sex.
Reading feminist literature about Christian Art (this here is Germaine Greer)...Just look at it.
>>45304793I know how lunatic this sounds, but - if you look into it, it's like Christianity is women who want to bang toddlers (>>45304133) shaming and blackmailing men for banging teenagers. Or having gay sex.... or even just sex.By the way, it's far more common for the genitals of one sex to be mutilated, and we pretend that sex is in charge. Even though everyone knows that the penis is a source of pleasure and pride for men. Nobody wants less penis.It's all a fucking joke.
Many people consider the purpose of life to have children. If monogamy is strictly enforced, you are limited to the number of children one woman can provide.Imagine mega-harems like once existed in the middle east never went away. They can tempt key influential men: promise them some extra children in life, in exchange for advancing their politics. Be it Christianity, Islam or feminism.If you think that sounds outlandish - does it? Does it sound more asinine than Epstein Island would had sounded 10-20 years ago? Or sex cults like NXISM?Ok... we pretend rich people only have sleep with one woman at a time. Yet sex cults like NXISM make inter-national headlines.It's a fucking joke. And everyone pretends along.Imagine "heaven" is either having lots of children, or banging children. Because both get you blackmailed. And making gay sex illegal also allows you to easily blackmail men. Imagine it's an entire cult who's entire purpose is to blackmail key influential men - to advance the interests of that cult. And it's mostly run by women.
This could had been the son of a very high ranking government official... they didn't mind him being depicted this way.
The emperors family and a few aristocrats weren't part of this. (their upbringing was more private than a semi-public buddhist temple)But otherwise it was elite samurai and high ranking Administrators who sent their children to these Buddhist temples, accepted this, and kept it going for generations.Some of these boys later became monks themselves.
Prudes will not let you get away with playing dumb. A prude woman ever caught you masturbating, looking at porn or whatever - and she dragged it out, made it as uncomfortable as possible?If you discuss any of this here with prudes, do not let them get away with playing dumb.
Here's another Christian era painting.That's a CHILD SATYR.Everyone knows what Satyrs are known for... it's a child satyr. <- these are the prudes telling you what is wrong and isn't.
Here's a drawing of a child Satyr. It kinda looks as if that boy would like to switch places with the boy who's being flogged... why is that woman nude? That's not discipline, that's instilling a fetish.And then she's depriving the slightly older boy. Woman act like: Oh my, spanking you? Well that's inappropriate. And it's unmanly of you to desire that. Thus i need at least 300 bucks an hour to make up for it.Now imagine they are so cynical, they put that in art.
Here's a photo of Nietzsche with a woman who's holding a whip. I have a suspicion that nietzsche was into BDSM, but at that time that was a bit difficult to have.And when i look at that drawing: >>45305247 it reminds me so much of that woman. Because it looks more like she's teasing him. She looks like a dipshit when she holds that whip up. Not like a woman who's actually into it. More like one who knows some men are, and that can be exploited.And they can more easily exploit fetishes in overly prude countries. And as asinine as that sounds - it feels like women are undermining society FOR THAT ONE PURPOSE. And they take it way too far.And yes: same with gay sex.... if you think that sounds far fetched, why do we keep mutilating penises? Clearly that's not rational nor in the interest of children or good for wellbeing nor is it fun.
I think when you look at their girls - it's visibly evident that they kept breeding femboys for generations.
For us this doesn't feel unusual - but most women over the world don't act like this. Say - middle eastern women.
They make quite a lot of femdom art over in japan. In some animes you'll find men openly lust after being dominated by a woman. That is also fairly unusual.But it makes sense: They bred femboys who later ended up in arranged marriages. Of course these femboys eventually began to lust after women dominating them too. Forcing them to have children.
Art and videogames released in the west are censored (or rather altered). Because else they'd be too girly and cute.Sounds silly, but you can easily see an 8 year old over here look at that cover art, and conclude it must be for girls. And thus tells him mom not to buy it for him. Or a mom being reluctant to buy it for her boy too.When we produce stuff for children - we also make the characters cute - but not too cute. But over on Femboy island they prefer stuff to be girly and cute.
It really shouldn't be surprising that Japan was all along femboy island, spending generations breeding femboys. It's so cute and girly - in hindsight it's obvious.And everyone loves it. The conservatives because it's nationalistic and values family, the spergs cause of anime, the degenerates cause of hentai, the liberals because it's degenerate....And the Christians said: it'd be a great idea if we prevent exactly these sorta men from ever having children. Because that's somehow better for evolution.
The way japanese men present themselves in fictional media is so very different from the way other men present themselves.Well, it makes sense that the mating strategy of femboys kinda relies on arranged marriages.
Do you realize how fucking weird this painting right here is? It's your culture. You grew up with it. Everyone tells you that's just normal... or it isn't what it looks like.No really... isn't that a fucking weird painting?
I understand the chigo boys of Japan were underage. I feel like it's better to wait until a certain age. But... really look at Christian era art. Like: REALLY look at it.Ok. I bet you once believed that Buddhist monks never have or had sex. That's kinda their modern day reputation. Right? But: over on femboy island they wrote in law that they dick boys - they made banging boys an official rule. They were very nice about it - and it wasn't infants. Oh - they also married women. OFFICIALLY that's against the rules of buddhism - to have sex with women. Let alone Marry. But: in japan, so many buddhist monks ended up marrying women anyway, they said screw it, let's just make it legal. Let's just make it all official.And your country cannot be blackmailed and corrupted if everyone is transparent about with whom they have sex with, what sorta perversions they have. And japans government feels very reasonable and accountable.
Like, you watch a show like Ankh the last Airbender - he feels clearly inspired by buddhist monks. And it's all about being disciplined... Meanwhile, historically at least over on Japan, Buddhist temples were run like gay sex clubs. And not in secret. It was official law. They wrote it down, they kept it going for generations. This goes so contrary to everything you believed and were told - you were quite frankly gaslit.
>>45305831There's a massive interest in pretending that nobody ever has sex. It sounds stupid - but it is so.What i write here - it's easily accessible in Museums and wikipedia. Yet, everyone assumes the polar opposite. Everyone assume people always followed the official rules of buddhism, which are: no sex.Sorta like Christianity in many ways.But: in reality, they ran their temples like gay sex clubs. And then they married women on top of that. <- that you still entertained their bullshit, proves how much influence fiction has over your world view.
Fiction can grossly distort your perspective and assumptions about things. If enough people pretend along.
If your assumptions about the Buddhists were this deluded and wrong (you were gaslit) - take a look again at Christian era art.What do you see? Everyone and their dog pretends it isn't what it is.
Putting a blindfold on someone who's nude... does that look like a bedroom scene? These people were prudes.And unlike the buddhists were you just assumed they abstained from sex (instead they had gay sex orgies) - the Christians did indeed make it illegal to have oralsex or analsex.And then look at the art they painted during that time...You cannot blackmail people without tempting and luring them. And if people are just honest and transparent about what they do - they cannot be blackmailed.
>>45306138Understand how cynical it is. If you do these sorta things with a very young boy - i think there's a fairly high chance it will instill fetishes.And once you grows older, the entire society will pretend that they don't have sex. Let alone sex which isn't vanilla missionary. And he should be ashamed for desiring sex, and double ashamed for desiring perverted sex.... who could possibly want that? Who could possibly want that fetishes are considered so shameful, they must demand at least 300 bucks per hour to fulfill them? And maybe two wheelbarrows filled with foreskins for good measure.
People who make erotic or even degenerate art can be incredibly talented.Yet prudes act as if avoiding fun makes them superior - without having anything to show up for it.It's true that people who create are often times too busy to seek fun. That's different from condemning fun or avoiding fun for the sake of avoiding it. These people pretend like they are one and the same thing.
The japanese are very quite, considerate and polite. I saw some videos of their children rushing over a street and making a bow at the end of it.And some conservative praise this on Twitter. I agree. A country like this is amazing.And it makes so much sense that they are this way - if you find out that they spend generations breeding femboys. Gave them harems. Rushing over a street and making a bow to cars - that does feel like femboy behavior, no? The entire country does. It's kawaii. And kinky.Yet... if it were up to prude conservatives, they'd get rid of exactly what made this country this way in the first place.
>>45306306>Yet... if it were up to prude conservatives, they'd get rid of exactly what made this country this way in the first place.Isn't that kinda depressing? Some likely cause they were gaslit.Conservatives aren't realizing this - but they are arguing to get rid of what made japan japan, and white people white.
Public nudity is very much white.Consider that in some other cultures, people don't go swimming without a full body suit.Yet if you listen to white supremacists, they argue whites would be better off becoming more prude. These fools do not realize that being kinky is sorta unique to whites and japanese. There's already more than enough prudes everywhere else.
Other cultures are very different. Well, they didn't breed femboys. Neither did they breed very kinky women (unlike the vikings who kept sex slaves).They killed adulterous women.Many white supremacists somehow convinced themselves that whites would be better off becoming more prude. That'd be to get rid of what makes white people unique.It's asinine that conservatives are against LGBTQ - given that some of the most nationalistic governments (japan, greece) were very gay.And the people they take issue with - are very much opposed to LGBTQ.
Femboy Island cares a lot about children and family.Historically, their schools were incredibly nice places. Unlike catholic schools. Femboy island did use corporal punishment - but Seldom. Like: once per year a student. Which seems very reasonable to me.
I really think you can spot femboy mannerisms in their biological women.
This right here doesn't feel white.Even though some people would like to pretend otherwise - it doesn't feel properly white.
we got a live one
>>45306534It's very different from a woman you can imagine larping as a shaman or druid, sperging out in the forest.One of them feels viking white. The other feels... more middle eastern. Well, the middle east is filled with prudes dressing up.
The Christians very well knew how to paint nudity in a way which isn't erotic.They made extra certain that's how Adam and Eve were painted. Even though Adam and Eve had lots of children - sorta populated earth.The two adults who must've bred like rabbits - they paint them as if they were siblings, no sexual attraction. Like a biology book.It's so obvious and overt, it's almost comical. In Christian era art, you see women have sex with everything (swans, death, Satyrs, foreigners, infants...) except young men age 18-30.
During the Christian era - they painted women with black boys. And she looks as if she just had sex. Like a reverse harem with foreigners.That goes against everything today's christian conservatives stand for. The more you look into Christianity and Christian era europe - the more you realize it isn't what it advertises itself as.Meanwhile: extremely gay governments like Greece and Japan were historically very nationalistic. Yet conservatives have disdain for that.
Once you swap the sexes, Christian imagery can become kinda disturbing.What is it like for heterosexual women? Historically, It's the imagery inside the tallest building in the town. If buddhist temples were historically run like gay sex clubs - then what happened inside churches?
This painting is from 1808. ... doesn't this feel kinda inappropriate?Based on your assumptions about what Christian places were like in 1808 - does this painting fit? Again: you will actively struggle to find a painting of a brothel from ~1400-1800 which looks erotic.Most paintings of brothels look surprisingly modest or even aristocratic. But there's plenty of paintings like this one right here...
Yet they weren't that nice to children.Unlike the people who were just transparent and honest about all their perversions and with whom they have sex with. Were rich people just openly admitted that they had concubines. (and all the children of these concubines were legitimate).In europe, some rich guys had mistresses - but those children were illegitimate.
There's a wikipedia article about sexually active pope's. It highlights one who had 4 illegitimate children.There's popes who had concubines.Some churches were historically accused of being run like brothels - but unlike Japan we didn't make it official. We pretended to fix it, and then never talked about it again.
>>45306865And a culture were men aren't supposed to do that - it can give women a lot of power. Because mere accusations can destroy the lives of men.Women get much more out of social taboos than men do.And men naturally prefer to brag about their sexuality than to pretend that nobody ever had sex. Christianity is all about pretending that nobody has sex - oh and gossiping about who took it up the ass.Christianity is incredibly effeminate. But without being girly cute like femboy island.
I think you can really just look at their women and say:Yeah, they bred femboys.This one might not even be the best example for that. But you know what i mean. You see some ultra kawaii girl or overly kinky japanese girl... yeah. They bred femboys.
Meanwhile - today the average white woman looks like we bred hookers.Given that historically some churches were accused of being brothels in disguise... maybe we did.
Imagine if historically someone had an idea:One man can impregnate multiple women. If the best man keeps breeding prostitutes, each generation mankind will improve.But it would have to be a man who's worth it: a Saint.We will tempt him. We will test him. Like: he has to endure a vow chastity and whatnot.... but instead of breeding saints, they ended up breeding hookers.But the hookers kinda loved it. And then they took charge of it.... is this outlandish? Sound schizophrenic?Well, isn't it weird as fuck that rich people no longer try to impregnate multiple women at once? That we talk so much about gender equality, yet somehow pretend ending circumcision isn't part of that?I suppose that's a different topic and i will go to bed.But - that's kinda religion in a nutshell too.
>>45307180and they said: well, if guys know this - that will change the outcome. Thus it must be kept a secret.But women also realized that by offering so many wombs, they can target key influential men to do their bidding...Imagine that sorta nonsense just went way out of hand. And that's why japan was a place were most of the time, they just did whatever is common sense, fun and fair. (they had official, small harems)and most other places historically did not.
>>45303961Pedo thread
