What's Michael Crichton's best work?
>>25290920I re-read the lost world every 3-4 years. Good stuff.
>>25290920Eaters of the Dead
>>25290920— The Andromeda StrainSlightly dated (it's the 1970s trying to be cool with their silly clunky computers and so on) but still very solid and pretty much entirely plausible.— The Terminal ManPlausible, tense. Not quite the comfy vibe of the others; a bit nastier somehow.— Jurassic ParkMuch better than the film.— CongoAll right I guess. Amy is fun. A million times better than the film. Not really much science. Story is a bit slight.— TimelineLots of fun but you have to just ignore all the "science". Time travel is bollocks and his attempts to explain it via quantum mechanics are embarrassing. It's basically a swashbuckling medieval adventure.— SphereAll right I suppose but you get time travel AND supernatural alien artifacts so there's a lot of disbelief to suspend. The prickly black mathematician is a well-written high-IQ character though.— Rising SunSolid but just a straight thriller really, not much science.— DisclosureLike the above but not as good. No science (none that matters anyway).— PreyOK but felt a bit slight. Like a short story expanded. Probably written with an eye to a film but for some reason they haven't made it.— The Lost WorldOne dinosaur book was enough.— The Great Train RobberyHe clearly wrote this because he liked the thieves' argot, the language of the Victorian criminal underground. He wanted to write a book with that in. Non-fiction, no science really but it's not bad.
>>25290959>Lots of fun but you have to just ignore all the "science". How was it? Quantum bubbles made with some king of ceramic or plastic?
>>25290965Yeah he basically uses the Many-Worlds Interpretation of QM to explain how you can go back to the past. You just "go to another universe that happens to be the past of this universe" (but things you do there miraculously affect the present of THIS universe). He handwaves a lot:— Shrink people down to the level of quantum foam— errr . . . magic happens— TIME TRAVEL!
>>25290981I should add that the word "wormhole" gets thrown around a lot. You have been warned.
>>25290920I really enjoyed that part in Airframe where the protagonist had to somehow sneak around in VR because that's the best way she could access some secret company files
>>25290992I haven't read that one. MC thought VR was going to be the Next Big Thing, by the look of it. He shoe-horns it into Disclosure, for no good reason. (Possibly just so the book can have some vaguely cutting-edge science; there's nothing else.)
>>25290959>one dinosaur book was enoughgay take. Both of the dinosaur books are very fun throughout
>>25290942>what if Beowulf was based on a historical account grounded in reality >but also literal fantasy dwarves exist
>>25290920Billy and the Clonosaurus
>>25291162The feral midgets are neanderthal.
>>25290942+1
Sphere. I feel like it's a book everyone universally loves. It's very nice to read and keeps you hooked from the first page.
>>25291006VR has been on the cusp of going mainstream for the last 4 years. I think people were just so impressed by the rate at which ICs and UI/UX was evolving at the time that it just felt obvious>punch cards>terminals>GUIsVR just felt like the next step forward. They just didn't realize at the time how much fidelity to "real life" was required so that people wouldn't feel sick and how long it would take to miniaturize screens to an acceptable size and resolution
>>25292415I'm surprised no one has made as shotty extraction shooter based on Sphere yetThe premise has a diegetic excuse for all of the mechanics
>>25291162>if your baby is born with a giant, burly cock, give him to the little men who live underground. It’s a great honor. What did Criton mean by this?
>>25290920State of Fear