How could he solve it when it was already solved by Kant?

>>25291558
Isn’t his point literally the opposite, though? How could philosophy be “solved” if meaning is relational and indefinitely unresolved by differánce? isn’t deconstruction making a problem for/of philosophy, rather than resolving it? Is philosophy about finding the right answers or posing the right questions?

That's not Wittgenstein

>>25291558
By destroying it? Sure.

>>25291614
hate the disciples not the Master

>>25291626
Bate

>>25291573
Relax; you know this person, and the next ten people who are going to respond to this thread, do not read.

>>25291558
Holy shit, Wittgenstein let himself go.

>>25291558
More like antiphilosophy
Philosophy was mostly solved by Aristotle, and completed by St Thomas Aquinas

>>25294579
This. Although I’d narrow it down and say that Aristotle and Plato covered the vast majority of it. Starting from present day and working backwards, you have tons of Jewish neuroticism, tranny philosophy, schizo nonsense, and pure sophistry to sift through. Around Kant is where things start to become normal and then the further back you go the better it all gets.