*breathes in*AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
absolutely shocked that the white polish lady with dreads is fucking stupid
>>25293699She's an AI shill because she's invested in an AI gaming company.
>>25293699Latest as in forthcoming or last published?
>>25293703I hope a robot rapes her
god white women are so fucking evil
>>25295491For (You)
i thought drive your plow was dogshit before all this came out
>>25295496no one cares about your jap fortune cookies, faggot. start with the greeks or go back.
>>25293699>After Nobel Prize-winner Olga Tokarczuk’s recent remarks implying she had used AI to write her recent novel made the rounds on social media, the novelist shared a statement with Lit Hub via her publisher, addressing the controversy:>Like any other conversation, remarks made before a live audience at a public event can be incorrectly understood.>I did not write my forthcoming book – to be published in fall 2026 in Polish – either using AI or with anyone else. For several decades I have written alone.>I state briefly and firmly:>1. I make use of artificial intelligence on the same principles as most people in the world – I treat it as a tool that allows faster documenting and checking of facts. Whenever I use this tool I additionally verify the information. Just as I have done for several decades by reading books and by exploring libraries and archives.>2. None of my texts, including the novel that will appear in Polish this fall, has been written with the help of artificial intelligence – except for using it as a tool for faster preliminary research.>3. I am sometimes inspired by dreams, but before this sentence too is cornered and torn to pieces by the experts, I hasten to report that they are my own dreams.
>>25295604total retard in the comments on this post
claude, write me 500 pages of whitey bad
>>25295611New York Times Bestseller
>>25293699>>25295604>Of her use of chatbots in writing, the Nobel laureate described her process in affectionate terms. “I often throw an idea to the machine for analysis, asking, ‘Honey, how could we develop this beautifully?’ Even though I know about the hallucinations and numerous errors of factual algorithms in the fields of strict economics and hard data, I must admit that in fluid literary fiction, this technology is an asset of incredible proportions,” she said. “I purchased the highest, most advanced version of one language model, and I’m often deeply shocked by how fantastically it broadens my horizons and deepens my creative thinking.”https://archive.is/ANuvb#selection-1347.0-1347.632
>>25295604It's basically conversational wikipedia so who cares?>>25295659This is how I use it when I'm writing as well. I don't /use/ it to write my text, it's like having someone else to bounce ideas off of. Most of the time the feedback or ideas for development are absolutely shit, but in realizing why I despise the suggestions I can work around blocks.
>>25295607this subhuman needs to be waterboarded with bug spray
>>25295670>>25295659The way LLMs work is statistical. They tends towared the most common text, not the most creative. You are dumbing you down and extiguishing the spark of true creativity by using LLMs.
Nobel for literature is a joke. They could as well pick the winner random from the phone directory.
>>25296035>chang big mad that China never wins
>>25295854You can't even parse three sentences so I don't think we need to rely on your hot take for human creativity.
>>25296053NTA but don’t worry, I’m here to shoulder the burden and objectify creativity.
>>25296040China pressured/bought one for Mo Yan. It was a scandal. Around that time it started sucking. China ruins everything.
>>25295607>Saying that something called a "Large Language Model" can't be used in writing doesn't make any sensei wish i could send him a live ferret wearing a collar that reads "large language model", and see how he writes with it. it would be simply absurd for him to refuse.
>>25293699I think that word processors and experimental writing has been like used with writing for such a long time that what almost is very odd to me is that like this author who wrote flights and has long pioneering experience with digital publishing and can look at some of the experimental possible potentialities is not emphasizing that this is in some way experimental art and for art that is made with ai in general i wish the often experimental nature of that art were more often recognized and acknowledged, and a book like flights though is an example of when experimental or fragmentary writing does get partially recognized though as an epigone of that art
>>25293699No she didn't.Read the interview you retard.Be mad at her all you like for her naive pronouncements about immigration in Poland, but she never said that she used AI to write anything she's published. She's also not Jewish.
>>25295604>using AI for checking factspeak midwittism
