[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1757373461905060.jpg (914 KB, 4096x4096)
914 KB JPG
> Be me
> Actually reading books in 2026 instead of doomscrolling
> Pick up Sarah Penner’s The Lost Apothecary and The London Séance Society
> Expecting absolute mid tier trash
> Actually pretty comfy?

Fast pacing, smoothly written, no bloated pseudo-intellectual filler. It’s not peak literature but it has just enough depth to not feel like NPC slop.

Anyone else read this or am I the only literate anon here?
>>
>>25300101
milk
>>
>>25300101
>be op
>faggot
>read slop
>think slop is good
Faggot.
>>
>>25300101
>Pick up [female]
>It'S aCtUaLlY gOoD
No it's not. You're retarded.
>>
>>25300101
>be op
>post cakeup tatted mystery meat to promote the same type of slop lit
>>
>>25300101
I wish Sarah would touch my micro Penner if you know I mean
>>
>>25300101
Is that Sarah Penner?
>>
>it's fast and smooth and not pseudo-intellectual
most deeply insulting praise read this week. you could make a living reviewing slop for the papers.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.