[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: shutterstock_753294010.jpg (1.92 MB, 1800x1200)
1.92 MB JPG
Are there any non-religious philosophers who argue for the existence of God? I'm not necessarily asking for Deist philosophers (though they could be that), I just mean are there any philosophers who hold to the existence of God as a legitimate philosophical position akin to any other philosophical position like being a non-cognitivist in meta-ethics, or a substance dualist, or whatever.
>>
>>25301323
I guess Anthony Flew perhaps?
>>
99.99% of them prior to 19th century
Practically all of them.
>>
Kant?

>I had to deny knowledge in order to make room for faith
>>
>>25301323
so, what youre looking for is non revelatory theology. you can start with math, the theology of the essence of necessary and possible, but you can get bogged down for lifetimes proving that it is a necessary fact about God's mercy that God would always leave the wind still at at least one point on earth. moving on, you can look at the non incarnate Christology of the Logos in the abstract, and the theology of what is the nature of the good. it is a useful exercise to consider what statements in the summa theologiae necessarily rest on revelation and for what statements is reason sufficient



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.