Holy shit, this book was eye-opening. I wish I had read it in my teens.
Would it have prevented you from becoming who you are today?
>>25305691Based.
Being a faggot is like winning the lottery of life
>>25305691>beat your kids>beat your kids>emotionally torture your kids>beat your kids
>>25305715Yeah
>>25305928>suffering builds character
>>25305819If fags just acted normally instead of parading their fetishes down the streets every year and trying to groom children into their bug-chasing cult, I'd have no reason to give a shit about them.I've met maybe two queers in my entire life who didn't make their sexuality their entire personality.
>>25305928>A Parents guide to Promoting Homosexual Masochism
>>25306040>parading their fetishes down the streets every yearNever seen this in my life
>>25306049>I've never heard of a pride parade
>>25306049Of course the leftist invades the thread exclusively to gaslight. What a hallmark tell.
>>25306049>Pretending to not understandClassic
>>25305691I read this book after it was removed from Amazon and found it really disappointing. Its insight into gays is incredibly lacking, it honestly reads like it was written by someone who has never once spoken with a gay person in their life.The premise of their work is that gayness stems from trauma that suppresses a male's masculinity. That's certainly true for some fags, but the majority have nearly the opposite problem: they obsess over masculinity to the exclusion of all else.
>>25306040you're not supposed to go to their events
>>25306278If you want a real answer read Psychogenesis of Mental Disease. Majority of gays emulate femininity unconsciously due to overbearing mothers (the camp voice is part of this). Other causes include Pavlovian conditioning and parasites.
>>25306278>>25307189The obvious cause with the most scientific evidence behind it is that homosexual orientation is just biological. It’s a result of genetic and prenatal hormonal influences. That’s why gay men tend, on average, to be effeminate and lesbians tend to be masculine. By and large, behavioural differences between the sexes are innate rather than socially conditioned (contra retarded liberals who still, against all reason, believe in the blank slate) so obviously the same applies to fags and dykes, especially when there has usually been an extremely large social cost to being deviant. Fags and dykes are nonconforming despite socialisation, rather than because of it. Feminine gays often try hard NOT to be feminine. But they can’t. Because it’s biology. It’s also why gay men appear to have higher verbal IQs and why gays and dykes exhibit physical differences from birth, like different average heights, digit ratios, etc.That being said, the expression of homosexual behaviour seems subject to social influence. For instance peer homosexuality in schools and prisons or the age-unequal homosexuality in patriarchal warrior societies like the Greeks and Japanese Samurai.
>>25307211>he thinks there's a gay gene that's survived natural selection for thousands of years
>>25307495NTA but most likely it's a combination of genetic and prenatal causes. It's been shown that low exposure to testosterone while in the womb results in a male child with very unmasculine behavior such as excessive avoidance of risk, dislike for rough and tumble play etc. Maybe male homosexuality is something for which there exist a genetic propensity that nonetheless has to be activated by prenatal conditions. Incidentally that would explain why there are many more homosexuals nowadays than there were in the past with senile pregnancies being not only more common but also actively encouraged
>>25307495Coeliac disease survived in the European population despite it leading to almost certain death in the medieval era
>>25307670>very unmasculine behavior >excessive avoidance of risk>dislike for rough and tumble play>homosexualsI can't tell if this is bait or you're just retarded
>>25307495It doesn't need to be a single gene to be innate and nobody believes that anymore other than retards who think this is a discussion-winning argument but know little about biology.There are concrete indications that it is an innate, physical thing connected somehow to the gestation process - the variations in the hypothalamus, the fraternal birth order defect (the more older brothers you have the more likely you will be gay) the increased fecundity of a homosexual's direct female relatives (this is a massive evolutionary boon and would explain the whole thing alone but the reasons for this are too complex to explain here). You have to be a legitimate cretin to think the single muh gay gene would need to exist to explain something this complex.
>>25307696Sources and recs? Im curious
>>25307699https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3515521/https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/roney/james/other%20pdf%20readings/Blanchard%25202001%2520Fraternal%2520birth%2520order%2520homosexuality.pdf
>>25307696>>25307727This is fascinating, desu. Do you think other factors such as upbringing, childhood sexual trauma, etc., play a role too? Homosexuality being inherited would explain why it emerges in societies which actively try to repress it, and on the other hand, why some of the fruitiest dudes I know are heterosexual, but raised by over-protective mothers.
>>25306118Oh no some guys with a flag and silly clothes, the west has fallen
>>25306040>be gay>make it obvious>people get mad and want to hurt you>keep it to yourself>the other gays who continue to be obvious now become the entirety of the gay population in the mainstream's eye since that's all they see>people get mad and want to hurt youBut at least I don't need to deal with women, right?>>25306278>The premise of their work is that gayness stems from trauma that suppresses a male's masculinityDoesn't sound unreasonable. The way some people insist it's diddling to blame every time are idiots, but clearly something "went wrong" and there are lots of different possible reasons why. There are some smart and wonderful people out there who happen to be gay, but there's almost always something else "wrong" with them too- mental illness or awful family relations or both.
>>25308025>Doesn't sound unreasonableAny monocausal explanation of homosexuality is kind of unreasonable at this point IMO. I think there are a ton of different kinds of people who end up clustering together as homosexual (or whatever) but arrive at that through totally different pathways. Also, historically, it wasn't a clean either/or thing. >>25307893So, like the Nazis?
>>25308033I agree and I like what you've shared ITT, assuming that was (You). Human sexuality is a complicated thing, and most of it doesn't have much to do with sex itself.>Also, historically, it wasn't a clean either/or thingFor sure; I bet most gays and lesbians are bisexual to some degree, but calling yourself gay is just easier for everyone. As a legbutt-American I really wish we had a means of collectively securing basic protections without subconsciously becoming Marxist vectors (I'm a lot of things before "gay" and it's annoying that someone's always trying to agitate one of those parts of me against another), but as things stand it's a balancing act each of us has to face alone.Someone mentioned "high verbal IQ" among gays and I think that's mostly just a necessary adaptation to navigating a socially treacherous position, similar to Jews except those guys have it hammered into their blood. Gays and Jews who aren't actively oppressed don't seem to ever amount to much, artistically...I wouldn't be shocked if Jews saw gays forming effective secret societies and alternative cultural currents, thought "hey that's our job", and intentionally destroyed those competing communities in the name of Rights And Progress, but that's a bit of a tangent.
>>25308184A lot of famous gay men seem to have been actively anti-Semitic...
