[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: David_Hume_Ramsay.jpg (474 KB, 1280x1550)
474 KB JPG
Kant's philosophical project was largely intended as a response to Hume's skeptical empiricism. But by the time Kant wrote, Hume was dead. Supposing that Hume had lived long enough to read Kant, what do you think Hume would have written in response? I suspect he would have much to criticize about Kant's transcendental idealism, so what in particular do you suspect would be his lines of attack?
>>
>>25307204
I would likely see him criticizing the phenomena as noumena itself, as it "cannot be known, either"
>>
>>25307204
Just read Aenesidemus by G. E. Schulz



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.