[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Metaphysik.jpg (1.58 MB, 1920x1745)
1.58 MB JPG
Kant showed the epistemological problem of synthetic judgements a priori... so to speak :
there can't be any progress in knowing a priori...

now some Hegel bros think that Hegel solved this epistemological problem... how did Hegel do it ?

i am asking because hegels dialectic... his method of thesis, antithesis and synthesis doesn't solve it at all...

so how did Hegel do it if he is the real goat ?
>>
>>25307748
>there can't be any progress in knowing a priori...
yes there can. the derivation of the predicables of pure reason out of the categories. the system of pure reason. it's in the first criitique.
>>
File: DerErkenner.jpg (35 KB, 482x271)
35 KB JPG
>>25307766
>Let it be allowed me to call these pure, but deduced conceptions of the understanding, the predicables[5] of the pure understanding, in contradistinction to predicaments. If we are in possession of the original and primitive, the deduced and subsidiary conceptions can easily be added, and the genealogical tree of the understanding completely delineated. As my present aim is not to set forth a complete system, but merely the principles of one, I reserve this task for another time.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.