Sharp-eyed scholars, at what point does the value of novelty run out? Does something good become bad because it loses its freshness? Does the value remain unchanged? Which philosophers analyze the relation of novelty and value? I seek answers through an emotional and experiential lens, not an economic one, so do not add money into the relationship; I speak of ideas and debate.
>>25310992Coal never becomes dust; it never ceased being dust.You'll think this is bullshit but it's true
>>25310992gems don't become coal, coal becomes gems.find a metaphor that isn't retarded.
>>25310992>I seek answers through an emotional and experiential lens, not an economic one, so do not add money into the relationshipThose are subordinate to economic factors.
>>25311012I have infinite wealth; now, engage with the parameters or leave.
>>25311014topaz isn't worth anything
