>Capital will soon poses personal robot armies, making public support, even public tolerance irrelevant. Uh Marxsissies.... where did he predict this one?I thought we were supposed to live in a post scarcity utopia, not be so much biomass in a post labor(er) utopia?
>post scarcityphrase rooted in vulgar economyit has nothing to do with scarcity (of what? commodities? use values? matter in general?), but with the social relations under which humans produce and reproduce themselvesthat is to say that the question is not how much who has, but under what social relations do people reproduce their 'livelihoods'regardless of how the material natures of commodities evolve, as long as commodity production, capital, money and all these basic elements of the capitalist mode of production exist, so will... the capitalist mode of production exist
>>25320540>biomassChud version of libshit "bodies"
>>25320540It is a post scarcity utopia though. Just not for you. You will be culled out
>>25320688True. Both are cancerous terms.
>>25320540Judging by the picture, socialists (China) will also have robots so it’ll all work out.In all seriousness, I don’t think Marxist thinking applies in a world where labor is wholly automated and the proletariat is entirely superfluous. The class will not really exist anymore, and the people who used to be in it will not have the importance/power in the system needed to force change.
Marx said that the dialectics mean the relationship between capitalists and proletariat will ALWAYS be stable and temporary.Marx extrapolated that as eventually the proletariat will kill the capitalists. But of course the opposite can also be true, the capitalists killing the proletariat.The point is that the Marx dialectics are clearly true and everyone including right wingers knows about "useless eaters" and the concept of the rich killing all workers when they are not necessary anymore.
