[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor applications are now open. Apply here!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1758374853351767.jpg (129 KB, 1500x943)
129 KB JPG
The virgin softback (literally) vs the chad HARDcover
>>
>>25322376
hardcovers are for decoration. i cannot get a decent read done unless my copy is completely ragged by the end of it.
>>
>>25322967
This. Hardcovers are really nice to look at and collect but they are so uncomfy to read. Paperbacks are so comfy once they get broken in.
>>
>>25322967
>>25322997
I feel sick when even I read a paper back, flopping all over the place and bending as I try to read? no thanks, a revolting experience, especially for larger works
>>
>>25323009
Okay I will agree that sometimes doorstoppers suck to read in paperback but modestly sized novels are nice. I like to fold the book in half when I read it and bust up the spine to make it lie flat if I wanna read it on a surface.
>>
>>25323027
Doorstoppers suck to read as hardcovers too, they are too heavy and their back gets damaged so easily when you read the book multiple times.
To read doorstoppers you buy hardcover for collection and read ebook version.
>>
>american glued hardcovers
puke
>>
>>25322967
>"Your books need to be completely cracked, stained and ragged or else you're not reading them!"

I don't know who was the redditor who came up with this shit, but just because you don't know how to read without damaging your books, doesn't mean no one else knows
>>
>>25323060
>they are too heavy and their back gets damaged so easily when you read the book multiple times.

I feel bad for americans and their cheap manufacturing of books lol. I have two doorstopper hardcover books that i've read back-to-back and both are just fine because my country actually cares to produce quality, long lasting books
>>
>>25323060
This is why I only buy quality hardcovers from at least 30 years ago
>>
File: 91408619.jpg (58 KB, 976x850)
58 KB JPG
>>25322376
Hardcovers for factual literature.
Softbacks for fictional literature.
>>
>>25323226
Fruuke. Fiction is not respectable.
>>
>>25323226
This. Book is essentially an archivation medium. Factual things are generally more valuable, so they deserve more robust archivation format. Fiction is essentially a lie, made mostly for entertainment, so softback is more than enough.
>>
>>25323226
this
>>
>>25323226
Fiction is more valuable.
>>
>>25323212
Same. It’s disgusting how much higher quality they are compared to modern books.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.