Why does this get so many people butthurt?
Plain old common sense
>>25325124Where is this from?
3/3
>>25325124>>25325127>>25325130your e-reader sucks, bro
>>25325124>>25325127>>25325130this guy better not be selling dildos or some shit after all that talk
>>25325124Oh, look, another self-absorbed douche unable to realize the blessing and gift to even have the means to create things in the first place>but muh consumer consent and mutual advantagehow convenient that you describe it in terms just vague enough that you don't admit any personal wrongdoing against anyone. This is one of those arguments that fall apart if you apply it to real life for even a second
>>25325318All right, make it fall apart by applying it to real life. I'll wait.
>>25325124>the best candidate always gets the jobcompletely ignores nepotism, cronyism, and intentional sabotagebahd baby might as well have written this
>>25325356The company that hires the best people outcompetes the nepotism company and puts them out of business unless the state intervenes to pick the nepotism company as the winner, which is what happens in our world and is the opposite of capitalism
>>25325356>"People let me get away with making this much profit ergo I didn't do anything wrong"If you have spent money on any business worth over six figures you would realize they incentivize their own self-interests over consumer well-being because they only measure success by profit margins, not productivity. They are so filthy rich that they don't even know what to do with their money and couldn't even fathom the amount of good/evil they're doing by pulling as much money out of people as possible. It's only mutual if both parties have an equal amount to win and lose, and businesses are bailed more times than you can count.
>>25325338for >>25326708
