Post 'em
the only chart i could reliably make is a modern philosophy one, maybe an epistemology one but it would just be articles. it would look ugly though
>>25325148understand metaphysics top-to-bottom. you won't find a more superiour education anywhere else
>>25325254im interested in the rebirth book based on the title, but maybe the title is just listing off an abusrdity
>>25325148Does anyone have a psychology chart or a better Freud one?
>>25325148This is such a weird chart. No Introductory Lectures? No New Introductory Lectures? No Interpretation of Dreams? No Moses and Monotheism? No Three Essays?>Freud by Lear>Civ and its Discontentsare good starter choices but after that the chart falls apart
>>25325342>but after that the chart falls apartEverything related to psychology falls apart when you eventually come around and face the fact that it's pseudo science. Come home to astrology, star-child.
>>25325254The follow:>Coomerswamy
https://www.readthistwice.com/person/peter-thiel
>>25325793>leftypol sticky chart
>>25325254I'm not reading alla that. Condense it to the most important 5.
>>25325816https://www.rbth.com/arts/334143-putins-favorite-books
>>25325814Niggerbrained faggot
>>25325819
>>25325342>>25325334
>>25325822Freud the pseud
>>25325254Still kicking around, huh Ken
>>25325825>Freud the pseudYour mom's a pseud ever thought about that
Anyone have a Hegel chart? I’m reading Beiser’s secondary source, and am feeling kind of lost since I don’t have my basics of philosophy down.
>>25325839https://www.amazon.com/Introducing-Hegel-Graphic-Lloyd-Spencer/dp/1848312083
>>25325148
>>25325847
>>25325820trannykike
>>25325853
>>25325853Is there any chart about the history, culture, and society of the ancient Greeks? I want to read the Greeks with an idea of the context they lived in
>>25325796why did he throw in rape of nanking
>>25325861>rapeThe rape dwarf is coming for you tonight Anon
>>25325856>>25325860Specifically with that as its end? Not that I know of. You should be able to build a rough image of it yourself just by reading them with an overview as a companion. I liked Durant's Life of Greece quite a bit.
>>25325871
>>25325148Anyone got a mohism or chinese philosophy chart?
>>25325148Bump
>>25325871>>25325876been looking for something like this for a while, thx anon saved
>>25325254
>>25325796My most recent favorite display of performance art on YouTube was watching Peterson pace around in one of his Etsy blazers in front of an obvious green screen studio mimicking a sterile mental asylum hold doing his typical flanderized pseud-babble about what “Beyond Good and Evil” means (not the book, just the title. Within two minutes you can tell he’s never a single page in his life) for almost 40 whole minutes while shitty AI generated renders of Nietzsche randomly flash in the background. All part of a freemium paid ‘university’ course on the subject btw.10/10 conservakike griftcore. Nothing but the best slop from Pissraeli Wire.
>>25325825>froyd the soyd
>>25325816This moron probably hasn't read a single book in his life.
>>25325796>Peterson in 2026
>>25326931>no Four Arguments For The Elimination Of Television rip. the latter 1/3rd of Four Arguments is a bunch of tendentious pseudo-medical speculation about how TV makes you nearsighted, but the first 50-75 pages or so are the clearest, most lucid intro to technoskepticism I've ever read
>>25325791low hanging fruit. just as much as why the long face for guenon lmao>>25325814sure.>The Enneads>The Unknown God>The Periphyseon>Philosophy as a Rite of Rebirth>Metaphysics (Coomaraswamy)you won't be doing yourself much of a favour with the amount of holes that will be present in your knowledge by limiting yourself to only these. The Enneads and Periphyseon can act as standalones, though, as long as you already understand Plato and Aristotle and are capable of actually thinking.>>25325830did someone say pressure mediation??
>>25325839I won't lie, Hegel is one of the worst starting points if you're looking to get into philosophy. It's extremely difficult to get into him without a basic knowledge of Kant since Hegel's career is based on responding to Kant and his successors. Beiser's book on him (the Routledge guide?) is a very good introduction though, as is Houlate's 'Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History.' Getting into anything like the Phenomenology though without having read at east a little bit of Kant is sort of damning yourself in my opinion. I'd definitely recommend reading Kant's 'Prolegomena' first, it's about 100 pages, also difficult but it will help a LOT. If you do want to go straight into Hegel though, I think probably the best place to start is 'Philosophy of History' which is him interpreting History through the lens of his philosophy, as well as giving you a lot of his ideas on society broadly. It's a good book and much easier than a lot of what he wrote. I don't have a chart but that might help a little bit.
>>25326931what is a blindpill?>>25325822>>25325148is there a chart for Jung?
>>25326855Ah, the eternal ‘belter seethe.
>>25326323Oooohhh thanks anon
>>25325148Anyone got a kafka chart?
