>1: The stressed vowel of a prosodic unit must not be the same as the vowel of the two prior and two posterior prosodic units.This rule forces you to expand your lexicon, beyond making your writing less repetitive. (These last two phrases ended in /ɛ/, for example. Never do this in a book's prose)>2: The sentence(s) or paragraph(s) must contain an obscure reference to another book, person, event, or any phenomenon of cultural significance.This impossibilitates your writing from being shallow, beyond providing incentive to study and creativity. (Sometimes you will be like "wtf was my character thinking here?" in the good sense)>3: The structure must be optimal, even if entire passages or books are to be rewritten.This may be called plagiarism, but it is not. Istead of copying ideas and contents, you will replicate their syntax. The closest analogy is "tracing", where you create a drawing based upon an existing picture, modifying it as you will. (This is more like a hack, but then Shakespeare was the greatest hack.)
>>25329311>This rule forces you to expand your lexicon, beyond making your writing less repetitive. (These last two phrases ended in /ɛ/, for example. Never do this in a book's prose)This is easy enough in English which has 13+ different vowels but what about, say, Greek, which has five?
>>253293111. I 2. hate3. niggers
>>25329311There are 10 golden rules, where are the other 7?
>2: The sentence(s) or paragraph(s) must contain an obscure reference to another book, person, event, or any phenomenon of cultural significance.How very postmodern...
Ever heard of alliteration?
>>25329342>what about, say, Greek, which has five?
>>25330852(Read collage in reverse order for the devolution of the Greek language from Attic to today.)Once ει were two sounds!
>>25330850the traditional english style
>>25329347>only 33%Gotta raise those numbers, kid
>>25330852why did they originally look like jeets
>>25329311Imagine thinking you will ever do anything great by following rules someone else wrote.
>>25329311These are pretty good desu.
>>25329311>impossibilitatesTry again bro
>>25332208>Fewer than 0.01 occurrences per million words in modern written EnglishDamn
>>25329311Ok, I'll give it a shotManny tossed the chicken fucking the atmosphere like Joltin Joe Dimaggio.Did I do it right? This seems very form over function. Maybe could enliven dull bits, but metering prolly works better.
>>25330852that's 6
