Must've been the wind
>stop having kids goy
Why is this board obsessed with this book? Sounds like the early web's fedora atheism fad in the early 00s. Is this place eternally stuck 20 years go or what?
>>25329629
>>25329726It's one poster
>>25329726>Is this place eternally stuck 20 years go or what?finally someone who says it besides me, I guess I'm not crazy after allit's even more evident on boards like /v/, people are genuinely stuck mentally in 2007 and refuse to move on while using the same memes and talking points over and over again (this is what happens when you completely detached from you "hobby" and just gossip about it online with other retards)and since the IP counter has been removed it's also likely just one schizo talking to himself as usual
>>25329572this guy is a zionist who advocates for jewish racial interests
>>25329629No kids means no kids for Jews too, by the way.
>>25329919Sorry, but the very fact that he is Jewish frees me from the obligation to actually engage in his literary corpus in any way, so I have no way of knowing if he actually does advocate this despite the seemingly contradictory parallel racial interests, and will simply assume that he doesn't.
>>25329726>>25329909What's interesting is that the tendency for humans to remember past events more fondly than they might have been is a topic that is discussed in the book. Of course you would have to have actually read the book to know this, so its not as if either of you would have known.
>>25330048Women remember events far shittier then they were, a lot of men do too
>>25330060Do you understand how this is the same thing written in a different way
>>25329914Based?
Reminder that anti-natalists are likely to be mentally ill and have a personality disorder
>>25330148This doesn't mean that anti-natalist arguments can be dismissed solely due to this fact (inb4 crying about ad hom); it does however add context to why autists make these threads and are completely unable to understand why they are wrong. It also has direct implications regarding Benatar's quality of life argument (i.e. anti-natalists are stuck in a rigid ideological system as a cope for to sustain their defective worldview).Say you're designing a logo and you want to market test for the most appealing shade of red. Would you want most of those in your sample population to suffer from protanopia?
>>25330148Anti-natalists are at a complete poverty when it comes to weighing quality of life. Their defective nature simply precludes them from accepting any rationalization outside of their own self-indoctrination. They don't necessarily mean to be disingenuous because such is simply written into their nature.Also note that the more you talk to them the more you'll realize a sick fascination with harm, violence, and death. These people don't want to reduce harm, they want to justify their resentment and spread their misery.
>>2532972698% of the users of 4chan never matured past the age of sixteen mentally.
>25330148>25330153>25330155Hey nigger can you not stink up the thread every time with your debunked pet study
>>25330148What this gorilla nigger will never show you about his little study:
>>25330196What's wrong with that? How does using Mechanical Turk negate the study when various statistical methods are used to validate the population sample?
>>25330168>debunkedYou mean by the redditor (he actually linked his reddit posts, kek) who didn't understand how the study was conducted and lied about a bunch of stuff?Pic-related is from a follow-up that replicated the results and expanded them.
>>25330196Are you the same retard who tried to claim the population sampled was entirely from India (which is false and based on no evidence) and lied about individuals participating in it multiple times (which, again, is false and based on no evidence)? How very dishonest and manipulative of you guys.Anyway, the problem the authors of this follow-up (>>25330223) brought up, because unlike yourself they're honest and non-biased, with regard to the population sampled is that White people are overrepresented as are people with university degrees. Before your pathetic little biased mind entices you to cope that the limitation being expressed is based on Prolific itself I will direct you to once again read the previous sentence. Aside, I'll bet if the population was solely people who continuously post and argue in favor of antinatalism online (i.e. the retards who populate these threads) the associations between antagonistic narcissism/psychopathic meanness/psychopathic disinhibition/antagonistic Machiavellianism and the beliefs they profess relating to antinatalism would be much more stark.
>>25329909I would say 2016
>>25329726>Sounds like the early web's fedora atheism fad in the early 00s.Those exact same people never left, they just traded their fedoras for crosses and now they're larping as hardcore fundamentalist christians.
>>25330212Great question. Its a random sample of the entire population, or at least of people who take such surveys. no problem with this, in fact its a good sampling method netting wide range of potential surveyees for minimal expense; .30 cents per survey times 276 is $90 USD, and also the IQ test that weeded out 82 in the first round and 16 in the follow up is robust.The problem with taking the easy way out in sampling is that your data, as peer-reviewed as it can be, will only ever tell you details and correlations about the average person. Furthermore this specific study had relatively low replicability in its follow up and also had a final total sample of 99 people, which would be questionably low even if the sampling was more specific and targeted (and therefore more expensive and/or difficult). neither of these last two points make it writeoffable.The study is impeachable in its methods, vague in its findings, and inconclusive in the implications of such findings. Nonetheless, its very interesting, and bears study and repetition. And then, like a robin that kills herself by slamming at 50mph into your glass window, in flys this absolute monkey gorilla retard with his copypastas and curated cherrypiggers to stink up the thread. its frankly disrespectful to the original study. yet this doesn't even come close to the shame he should feel about never even reading it
>>25330024Don't care, antinatalism is correct.
>>25330606>The problem with taking the easy way out in sampling is that your dataThey didn't. >Furthermore this specific study had relatively low replicability in its follow upThis isn't true. >The study is impeachable in its methodsAgain, not true. >vague in its findingsNope.>inconclusive in the implications of such findingsNope.So you have nothing but lies and cope. At least you avoided the lies about the population being comprised solely of Indians who were retaking it over and over to make more money this time. Probably because this follow-up >>25330223/>>25330278 BTFO'd you before you had the chance (hence you avoiding it), lol.
>>25331639the population being comprised solely of Indians who were retaking it over and over to make more moneyDidn’t even consider this but it’s probably true
>>25329629They're the ones who want you to have children. More blood sacrifices for the loosh farm.>>25329726/lit/ has been garbage since the /r9k/ board split into here and /sci/.>>25330311Those were Reddit immigrants starting in 2011; the "if you critique religion in any way then you are a fat overweight fedora-wearing man" shitposters.
>>25332256>>25330278
>>25329572Anti natalism is refuted by the simple fact that anti natalists don't kill themselves. Therefore their entire premise, that non-existence is better than existence, falls apart.
>>25332357>if you didn’t like my sandwich so much why don’t you just an hero to get rid of the memory of eating it?
>>25332344sorry, but i think i will be confronted by something that will challenge my beliefs so won't be reading this. Thanks for opening my mind to the theory that the 217 survey-takers were just all just indians putting in random answers though. I will now act as if that is what actually happened, which only makes my argument stronger
>>25332506>retard antinatalist compares "le grand horror of existence" to not enjoying a sandwich Lol, never change (not that you're capable of such anyway).
>>25332513>antinatalist finds out he's just a retard with a personality disorderLol
>>25329726i use it as a meme on other boards
>>25329726>>25329826Someone who watched True Detective for the first time 10 years later and can't get over it
>>25330148>>25330153>>25330155Reminder that you keep posting this nonsense despite previously being absolutely BTFO'd by anons who are smarter than you.
>>25333008You curse the fact you exist and seeing grass gives you existential dread, bro. The only thing you BTFO are the waistbands in your sweatpants.
>>25329629fpbp
>>25330311Nah a lot of them they became woke cultists
Notice how it's only white people falling for this anti-natalism bullshit while brown people just don't care
>>25333481That and trannies.
>>25330311No they claim to be "cultural christians" like dawkins
