This is worse than book burnings.
>>25331034Imagine being buttmad about a brief note in an obscure book from a public library
Library-goers are such pathetic scum. You get what you deserve. Buy your own fucking books.
I have zero sympathy for people who actually check out books from public libraries.
replace the note with one of your own
This is what happens when your country becomes more illiterate.
>>25331060This should be a /lit/ banner
>>25331034>Every norm is an eternal expression of infallible moral truths, even if those norms came to existence yesterday.
>>25331034The author of this book, Angus Wilson, was a homosexual. How dare this library denigrate the lived experience of the LGBTQIA2S+ community!! You need to report this to library staff immediately and make them aware of this transgression. It's absolutely sickening that this happened during Pride Month :(Do these people not know that it's 2026???
>>25331136Idk what the hell you were trying to do with those spoilers dude. The easiest way is to just select the text you want to spoil and press ctrl+S.
>>25331043OP here, I printed the paper out and put it in the book for this thread. You can see in the image it isn't even taped down. Nevertheless it caused about 9 chuddy meltdowns so far. More to come.
>>25331277OP here I also forgot to mention I'm trans teehee~
>>25331034we live in cringe times. some dude got cancelled for laughing at a shirt that said nega. we're doomed as a society.
>>25331277>isn't taped downMate, there's thing called glue, paste, etc.
>>25331593unreadable trashdo us a favor and stop posting your blog posts as if they're excepts from a famous book
>>25331437>there's thing called glue, paste, etc.Good idea, I'm getting hungry.
>>25331599I'm sorry for you if you browse this board and think that's bad writing, there ought to be an iq check to post here
>>25331339Hey, what was this sock puppet show called again?
>>25331608>>This is not bad writing>...babies can't handle the big bad world that that has excluded them...>that thatGet an IQ check yourself, ESL brownoid.
>>25331034Why? It's not great but you can still read it you dumbass ape.
>>25331756NTA. You are right that it is not great writing, but its message is important, and to portray that message more effectively it could use some tidying, particularly of its sneering tone and the removal of>...babies can't handle the big bad world that that has excluded them...However "that that" is perfectly grammatically correct in English speech and writing, it functions better in speech as the 'a' in the second "that" in a "that that" sentence is usually less strongly pronounced; being pronounced more like "thut." It is ugly to come across in prose, but it is not incorrect to use, nor is it evidence of an ESL.
>>25331610Sifl & Olly
>>25331813Thanx m8
@25331277This is what I suspected.No, you cannot have a (You). You do not deserve one.
>>25331809>Brownoid uses ChatGPT to respond and he nor ChatGPT doesn't even understand that "that that" in the quote is 100% incorrect Love to see it.
>>25331034Millennial activism is strange because it seeks to destroy the past out of spite for their parents but their alternative as a replacement is corporate sponsored propaganda. It's beyond infantile.
>>25331860You guys sure love blaming me for shit I never did nor supported.
>>25331866Yeah. It's never millennials fault, it's always those evil boomers who are richer than them or those evil zoomers that are younger than them.
>>25331869Didn't say that, CUNT. I've never had ANY say or sway in the way culture or politics go in my entire 35 years of life.Suck my cock. You can't vote yourself out of this idiocy, pussy.
>>25331876>reddit spacingYeah, you are the problem here.
>reddit spacing Nonargument. Concession accepted.
>>25331876Every molecule makes the ocean. It's all our fault, collectively, across generations.
>>25331889Sure, but it's not mine.
>>25331885>NOOOOOOOO, YOU PUT A SPACE BETWEEN A SHORT PARAGRAPH AND A SENTENCE!! YOU ARE MY ENEMY!!!You people are a special kind of fucking insane.
>>25331827>ChatgptWhat?
>>25331034Going to use this as my ex libris
>>25331896Says the millennial chimping out over some words.
>>25331957>t.mad about spaces between paragraphs
>>25331034Did you glue this on yourself OP
Why isn't a single post here mentioning the obvious fake nature of the OP image? Are you literally all bots?
Nah, it's not.
>>25332100Not enough shadow to be sure. I have seen similar 'warnings' in a research library though, they're usually on the plastic cover. Like porn magazines in the 60s, jackets to hide the tits.
>>25331034lame>>25331057>>25331060also lame fuck is wrong with you?
>>25332354>t.buttmad book sloppy seconds enthusiast
>>25331034They can put these faggy little stickers on as many books as they want lol. Won’t stop people from reading the books and won’t stop the truth and wisdom from carrying on to future generations who will remove the faggy stickers.
How much would the library charge if they noticed this missing?
>>25331043The you won't mind overpasting with a different note.
>>25331827Dont bother, his brain is fried
>>25333001Meant for>>25331944
>>25333005Are you actually retarded? I pointed out how "that that" in his faggy blogpost was 100% grammatically incorrect. It was some weird typo where he accidentally typed it twice, probably because he paused mid-composition because he had no idea what he was saying or where he was going with the sentence. But the that "faggot" responds and doesn't even address whether that specific instance of "that that" was correct. "He" just goes on a tangent about how actually "that that" can be correct, again not addressing whether his use of "that that" is correct. That's textbook ChatGPT behavior.Again, a very major point is no one has yet to argue why this specific quote>babies can't handle the big bad world that that has excluded themis actually "correct".
>>25333090>the that
>>25333090bro maybe stop looking at a grammatical error as proof of anything but a grammatical error, but I don't know why I bother because you're the kind of person that can't see beyond that, probably because you didn't even understand what was said.
>>25331034If you think this is bad, wait until I tell you about publishing houses hiring "sensitivity readers" - aka "Professional Censors" - to evaluate and correct every new manuscript submission for the last decade. It's one of the reasons why so much of it sucks nowadays.The future of literature is a case of terminal cancer. The bad cells have long been replicating out of control.
>>25333330The only person replying to your blogpost is me, calling it unreadable trash. Surely if it was good, other anons would've chimed in by now...it's also extremely pathetic that try to pretend like your shitty writing is published by posting a screengrab from an ereader.
>>25333448Maybe you'll grow up one day, but I doubt it. There's no point in talking to stupid people, bye.
>>25331034It would be funny to see this with anon's novel that's like 95% nigger
