I find the lack of kantposting disturbing
>>25333170Philosophers got exposed as midwits so we discuss literature now
his project was a failure and he was wrong about everything
>>25333170it's not that I kant, it's that I wont
>>25333171>Philosophers got exposed as midwitswhen was this?
>>25333648Every day on this board. Pseuds regularly embarrass themselves with their philosophy threads.
>>25333173>his project was a failureIt eventually lead to something meaningful in Marx so it was not all wasted.
>Woo-men, you can have sex with them, but don't eat them.
>>25333170>woaahh we can't know shiet unless we presuppose eternal ideas.>no one has said this before>revolutionary
Any others also have the weird experience that their opinion of Kant keeps changing? It never settles down. With other philosophers it's easy. Nietzsche will always be good too me, The classics are nice too. Most french philosophers are frauds, Bertrand Russel is a hyper fraud who never wrote philosophy, only pornography where he misunderstands other philosophers. Was also eternally refuted by Nietzsche, who did that by accident. Fred N was philosophizing with a hammer, smashed an idol and a microscopic piece of stone came off which landed on Russel. His mind was killed on the spot.German philosophy is so good, even Kant is hard to fully refute. Their logic is so clean that even when you disagree, you often have to appreciate the structure at the very least. I guess the language in which you write might be the most important. Would love to be able to read chinese, must be kino to have a language without an alphabet.
>>25334718ngmi
>>25333170looks like a disfigured little imp am i supposed to believe his german to english translated run on sentence slop where you get halfwaybdown the page and realize its still going has anything to say?
there is Kantposting almost every day and not a single person on this board has actually read Kant
German Idealism has been a bane on Humanity since its inception.
>>25333170then fucking post something of value relating to Kant instead of using a picture of him as a fucking avatar
>>25335170i have an iq of 132 and can't get through 1 page of kant. i have no clue what the fuck he's talking about
>>25336287IQ has nothing to do with whether you are going to "get" philosophers or not, to /lit/'s dismay
>>25333170Kant is really boringthere is perhaps no drier author than him, and his books are extremely long
>>25336306>im so retarded>im so retarded that like cant even lik literally
>>25336314I will read him but I will not enjoy doing it
>>25336299hm, actually this makes me feel better about never getting him. thanks
>>25336318that's the spirit!
kantians aren't people
>"I've never been on this street in Konigsberg before," he thought, the unfathomable irksomeness of his clockwork routine's interruption bristling across his sizeable cranium.>"DIALECTICAL CHIMERAS COULD BE ANYWHERE." he said out loud, with his warranted fear of dogmatic philosophy in mind as the Rhenish wine from lunch coursed through his chaste virginal vasculature, "I HATE DIALECTICAL CHIMERAS!">"With Intellectual Apperception, you can speculate on anything you want (except God)." he said to himself, out loud in earshot of von Kleist lying wait in ambush behind a tree to contrive bumping into him, in violation of the Categorical Imperative.
What's the point of the philosophy general if you homos still make these threads?
>>25336287He writes nonsense to the tune of circular reasoning. So long as you reject without recognizing the premises Kant takes for granted, it will sound like gibberish. Really, it's snake oil. If you want to go insane, read Kant. Otherwise, read Chesterton or Rev. Denis Fahey.
