[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images(53).jpg (49 KB, 554x554)
49 KB JPG
>>
>>25348604
Atheisism (More precisely physicalist naturalism) in a general sense, Is a cancerous tumour on society
>>
>>25348607
Yes I concur, it ironically leads to superstition instead of any useful concepts as most who adopt this world view deny any sort of real metaphysic, considering it a spook.
>>
>>25348604
How is he different from anarcho-capitalists again?
What's his nuance?
I forget what he's wormtonguing Peter Thiel's anus with these days...
>>
>>25348625
>How is he different from anarcho-capitalists again?
His idealism is that a few, oligarchs and what could be better described as feudal-lords, own the people. He as well considerd himself a monarchist.
>>
>>25348632
Sounds like techno neo-feudalism with an aristocratic paintjob (turbogay).
Does he believe the tech oligarchs are "strong" or just wealthy enough to finance his existence till he expires?
>>
>>25348604
Why do people want to engage this guy so much?
>Doesn't write anything since 2014
>Doesn't influence tech at all, despite people saying he does for some reason
>Doesn't even have a book out

Why is Mencius Moldbug still relevant?
>>
>>25348658
I like his new monarchism for the new era but I just don't like atheism for anything at all.
>>
File: 20260103_113226.png (119 KB, 639x666)
119 KB PNG
>>25348647
Anon he's an accelerationist it isn't supposed to be permanent or something
>>
>>25348604
mate he has long gone deranged black pilled with this admin failing to fulfil his vision in any form. I wouldnt be surprised if he hasnt already bought a home in Argentina
>>
>>25348671
>he's an accelerationist
great and I'm Katechonic... fuck him and his entropic aid.
someone has to be anti-anti-Christ...
not a fan of Nick Land either; his techno-capital god suck but it's all his nominalistic anglo-mind can comprehend.
>>
File: Wormtongue & Theoden.jpg (16 KB, 340x147)
16 KB JPG
>>25348658
>Why is Mencius Moldbug still relevant?
because he tells rich people what they want to hear.
>>
Curtis Yarvin has spoken positively on JD Vance, but has he ever addressed the rampant corruption going on in the administration? He strikes me as a grifter too delusional to see things for how they really are, which is that the US is a declining empire.
>>
>>25348665
do you like his monarch selection?
I personally don't think being successful in 80/90s era computing scene should translate into absolute political power... I kinda side with the anarchists on the limits of the flesh against high velocity projectiles on this one (advances in the Sword of Damocles technology)
>>
File: guillotine.jpg (62 KB, 758x530)
62 KB JPG
>>25348693
>advances in the Sword of Damocles technology
Exhibit A
>>
>>25348691
He cries about this administration on twitter constantly. He's extremely annoying and never posts anything even remotely interesting. His posts are almost as worthless as someone like Ben Shapiro.
>>
>>25348607
Organised religion (more precisely Christianity) has been the single greatest disaster to befall western civilisation.
>>
>>25348807
Only if you file it under the general category of Jewish subversion. It's a big enough calamity to get its own subsection dedicated to it, though.
>>
>>25348604
I don't think he's disingenuous, but his ideology never made sense to me.
>Yarvin supports authoritarianism on right-libertarian grounds, claiming that the division of political sovereignty expands the scope of the state, whereas strong governments with clear hierarchies remain minimal and narrowly focused
Historically, this isn't true at all. Powerful governments with clear hierarchies almost never remain small and disciplined, even if designed to be. You have probably 100 contemporary examples of autocratic, low-liberty governments today, and maybe like 2 examples of autocratic, high-liberty governments - just Singapore, really. Successful autocracies are definitely the exception rather than the rule.

The big problem with authoritarian governance is that you're always one shit leader away from total and immediate collapse. Most autocracies devolve into shitholes where the leader uses the state as a tool to enrich themselves. I've never seen a compelling argument for why his neo-monarchist system of government wouldn't end the same way.

Absolute power works when you're running a company, because the worst thing a bad CEO can do is burn their company to the ground. It does not work when you're running a nation, because the worst thing a bad leader can do is start a nuclear war.
>>
>>25348872
(same anon)
If nothing else, I do like his idea of breaking the government up into a series of city-states that compete to be the most efficient. That also has its issues, though:

Suppose an idiot gained power in a particularly prosperous state with a large nuclear arsenal, and unilaterally chose to nuke every other state in the region.
In developed countries like the United States, polio and malaria have been almost eradicated. How would you prevent diseases re-emerging in a particularly incompetent state, and spreading to the rest of them?
How would you stop a citizen from committing a crime in one state, and then fleeing to one of its rivals to avoid prosecution?

It's just too easy for any individual state to completely fuck over every other.
>>
>>25348807
Christianity fought Jewish subversion until the time came when the people decided cooming, drugging, and tuning out was more important. Our countries are Jewish controlled hedonistic hellholes. Your wife, if you find one, will be blown out by her former sex partners. Eventually she’ll cheat on you. You only get one life, might as well be a total degenerate.
>>
>>25349052
>Christianity fought Jewish subversion
Stopped reading there. Christianity is Jewish subversion.
>>
>>25349055
>2000 year running conspiracy to enslave the world by mastermind Jews who knew perfectly how to do it but also decided the original text wasn’t subversive enough so introduced Scofieldism and then decided to fight any semblance of Christianity by undermining morality, pushing porn and homos, fighting prayer in school, suing to have nativity scenes removed, making Christmas about winter and hot cocoa and importing Hindus and Muslims by the millions
It’s believable!
>>
>>25348691
>"grifter"
>has the same politic for ~30 years
>>
>>25349052
>Your wife, if you find one, will be blown out by her former sex partners. Eventually she’ll cheat on you. You only get one life, might as well be a total degenerate.

Exact line of thought I have. But hedonism is just not in my nature.
>>
>>25348604
I don't understand how /litpol/, which leans nationalist and despises minorities, has gotten psy op'd into the idea of a corporate state. As though corporations don't bring in foreign workers all the fucking time.

This is an open borders proposal but in disguise you fucking retards.
>>
>>25348604
Values don't require a mythological basis, actually.
>>
>>25349648
>has gotten psy op'd into the idea of a corporate state
Don't mix up economic corporatism with corporatocracy, they are very different despite having similar names.
>>
>>25349648
>"/litpol/"
>imagine not writing /polit/
this is why leftists always lose
>>
>>25348604
It's better for society to be atheist, if that's what they believe. Eventually they'll form a religion that suits them. You can't force these things, no one wants christlarpers.
>>
>>25348658
his only relevance was to destroy calvinism, an achievement he now views as a mistake
>>25348872
>The big problem with authoritarian governance is that you're always one shit leader away from total and immediate collapse
whereas with a dumbocracy youre guaranteed evil leaders who will intentionally destroy more than you ever thought possible
>the worst thing a bad CEO can do is burn their company to the ground
and a dumbocracy can make marriage illegal and mandate that the state raise the children to destroy the peoples ability to reproduce, then replace them with foreigners
>>
>>25349648
because corporate rentacops dont naturally enforce divorce court judgments or force your kids to go to school for slavery and holocaust class, only dumbocracy police do that
>>
>>25349052
>Christianity fought Jewish subversion
Jewish subversion became a thing entirely because of Christianity. Before Christians came to power in Rome, Jews were just another oriental nigger tribe. When Christians made Judaism the only other religion legally allowed to exist alongside it, it spread and mutated into the shit we have now.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.