So, /lit/? Which is worse?
>>25349401An altered photo is worse
>>25349401>a photo that alters realityWith that title I thought this would be some kind of SCP thing but I was sorely disappointed to find pseud drivel
>>25349401This is Nineteen Eighty-four at its most surface-level.
>>25349413Doesn't it sound fun to you the notion of "hey, maybe things I know are obvious I only think are obvious, ought to check"? How else would you see problems in what you do, do you think people that act "wrongly" (whatever that means to you) don't have a justification for each and every action? Even if you see the "wrong" thing as obvious, that doesn't mean they see it, because it's anteceded by a justification.The point is what makes you so sure you're not doing the same thing? "well, because.." exactly.
>>25349419Are you drunk or just shit at English?
>>25349421high but yes
>>25349419Has anyone ever really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
>>25349450What?
actually I do know something about this topic, though I'm by no means an expertit's easy to tell if anyone knows anything about it; just ask them if they know who this man was without any technological assistance
>>25349401I think Baudrillard already covered this. And it's kinda true. An entire generation of westoids are programmed to think of gulags and famines whenever they read the word "communism".
>>25349603But are they really wrong, though, thirdie?
>>25349401>DID YOU KNOW YOU CAN GASLIGHT PEOPLE???oh wow reallyLike the article has a unique purpose of showing the extent of people's agreed hallucinations but it definitely doesn't deserve a whole thread on /lit/. This is low effort low quality.
>>25349606If you are framing it in terms of right and wrong then you haven't read or failed to understand OP's post.
>>25349626Disingenuous response.
>>25349649Calling my response disengeous won't changed the fact that you missed OP's point. But that's expected from someone who can't see beyond their own brainwash.
