[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.25354851
 No.25354851 Archived
>pick up pic related expecting a biography of Genet
>it's actually Sartre’s enterprise to exhibit his own philosophical style while writing about a specific figure
The fuck?
It’s literally the modern equivalent of a goodreads review.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25354860
 No.25354860
>>25354851
>OP discovers literary criticism
>>
Anonymous
 No.25354894
 No.25354894
>>25354860
Criticism by immersion breaks every rule of decorum established for a critic.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25354897
 No.25354897
>>25354851
>Sartre is my friend. He has about five ideas. They're very good ideas. He has five of them.
-Jean Genet
>>
Anonymous
 No.25354940
 No.25354940
>>25354894
Says who? That has applied to a greater or lesser extent to every significant critic for centuries.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25355153
 No.25355153
>>25354940
>things that never happened
>>
Anonymous
 No.25355900
 No.25355900
>>25354851
Sartre's books on Genet, Baudelaire, Mallarmé are all shit. You're better off reading Bataille's Literature and Evil or Blanchot
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.