[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: cache cube.png (408 KB, 989x486)
408 KB PNG
this actually blew my mind. what if the antithetical nature of modality, and antinomy itself, completely explained philosophical optimism and pessimism?
>>
>>25361524
You could take either side of each antimony and still view it either optimistically or pessimistically so I’m not sure what you mean. The dialectic of pure reason is purely theoretical.
>>
>>25361527
i suppose. from a problematical assessment of these things if you judge them to have certain conclusions for your personal views it would influence them as such. but yes, i guess whether one is good or bad is a matter of what you believe or want to argue. for example if you wanted to know what something would be like before it came into being you would refer to these things and it would tell you how to feel, in as much as it would inform what is possible or impossible depending on where the chips fell.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.