>They hate when you read>They hate when you don't read>They mostly read pseudo-scientific bs or porn>They call you toxic if you point it out
>>25384676You can and should just ignore the ragebait liberal women indulge in
>>25384676Your mistake is paying any attention whatsoever to women.
>>25384680It's funny how the only people who get triggered by that shit are the ones who don't even read in the first place.They remind me the white, rich woketards whining about niggers being underrepresented in media.
>>25384676>Virtue signaling: woman-hating edition
Ragebait aside we live im a weird metaculture where everything you do is filtered through the internet's judgment. Nothing matters except what the product you consume stands for. Almost nobody does anything that's not accessorized as part of identiity politics. Addictions are the only true self-serving interest that remains.
>>25384695A comfortable middle-class man intentionally becoming a crackhead to prove he's a human being with agency is an interesting idea.
>>25384676Did Ben Garrison draw that shitty cartoon? It has the same self-righteousness as the majority of his output.Anyway, if you get your opinion of modern women from low-effort far-right sources then don't complain when they avoid you.
>>25384676>he actually paid for SlopGPT to gen this shitThe argument can stand without a Facebook Wine Mom image, OP.
>>25384676this is literally a "I hate woman" thread. there are no winners in this race, op
>>25384728No: it's eh eye zlop
>>25384676I looked at the best sellers list today. 8/15 titles were porn for women.
hate these soulless cartoonseven a soijack would be better than this
>>25384676AI slop
>>25384776>>25384794>>25384900Epic! I started a thread looking for validation and got a bunch of delusional troon bigots mad about *checks notes&* art being democratized?>Duhh normal folks have access to art now? It isn't just trannies and perverts? AHHH IM GOING INSANEEvery. Fucking. Time. you freaks brigade my threads and every time I defeat you.
>>25384981What is with this "art is now democratized" bullshit you stupid niggers spew? You could always pick up a pencil or open MS paint, you just didn't because you're a cock mongling queer. What you're actually describing is an art welfare state. The existence of art online is taxed for its own existence and used so that retards like you can hit a button, see your krusty Monday's slop burger image and clap like a seal. You are a mental welfare queen
>>25384676>gAyI slopeat shit and die>>25384981>art being democratized?it's not art retard
Generally speaking I don't give a shit what other people read. I mean if I ever complete something enough to be worth self publishing then I would care if they read my stuff, but beyond that I don't give a shit.I think most of the "discourse" around what men and women do or don't read is mostly fake outrage to use as weapons in the attention war. The people bringing this shit up don't actually give a shit. They just want to make you angry because if they make you angry over some dumb shit you are more likely to pay attention to them so they can shill bullshit products and shove propaganda in your face. It doesn't matter. None of this shit matters. Stop rewarding grifters who refuse produce value and instead make the world worse by being annoying attention whoring faggots.
>>25384981You've been upgraded from Facebook wine mom to petulant Karen. Congratulations!
>>25384792>best sellers listSee >>25385020
>>25384981Low effort reply to an low effort post>>25384695 prophesied your post. try again
>>25385005>mental welfare queenTopkek, OP is a bot.
>straight white male victimhood thread #31719
>>25384680You mean cede culture to them forever? Why?
>>25384700many people do this
>>25385403You’d be ceding the culture to these people if you keep impotently seething about them online. You need to ignore them, write/publish/read/BUY (the last one is important) the sort of stuff you want the culture to have.
Post complaining about women complaining should be a bannable offence
Admittedly this is really old, and it was in a country that doesn't speak English, but I remember it was shown that men and women read roughly equally much, when you count things such as wikipedia articles, video games, and movie subtitles. You only got the gap when you disregarded a lot as "not real reading".
Why wouldn’t there be women hate threads? Why would the average man of today not hate the average woman of today?
>>25384981Democratize deez nuts
>>25385652>don't TALK about stuff you want changed. Being a mute gimp is how you WIN societal change! By yourself, in isolation!okay, this guy's a new low of narcissistic pseudfaggotry
AI is the culture war final boss. Except the way to win them is by totally fucking off as far away as possible from any discourse involving the culture wars. Trump already declared a new golden age in the U.S that means no matter how much you complain about the "establishment" you're (cue Donald Trump voice) WRONG so now the next thing is admitting for once that AI is a great filter for artistic output, the internet and the American establishment once allowed for mass-media youth culture that gradually stopped rewarding talent in favour of holding the right leftist talking points and once this bubble crashed following the advent of social media the amount of pollution on soundcloud, blogger, youtube and wordpress (the old substack for youngers who might now know) and also the insane amount of nonsense meme pages on facebook, twitter and instagram have far outlived their creative novelty. AI can do all the shit you and your podcast friends can do better, faster, just as creative. That makes AI a great filter for artists, now only *GREAT* artists can arise not alongside, not despite but BECAUSE of AI's total assimilation of the same bullshit that has been spewed by people who think they have business doing creative work because they refuse to find something they're actually good at where people aren't ashamed of knowing them. It's either be great or get devoured and shat out by a machine...
>>25384676>ai shit
>>25384676They might have a point tho. Fem anon checking out /lit/ for the evening, usually frequent other boards. The posts are mostly about rape and women reading the bible (and sexualizing them readingthe Bible). Perhaps "lit bros" are just predators with poor taste.
>>25386247Post feet or armpits or GTFO
>>25384686Why do you watch Azumanga Daioh unmuted? Do you enjoy paying attention to foids’ shrill screams?
>>25385753Hating women is like hating children. Imagine if there were child-hate threads everywhere.
>>25386282You have no idea how hard I laugh people trot out the "actually they're just children and shouldn't ever be taken seriously" argument. It's 2026, theyve aborted tens of millions of their own children and destroyed western states. Wtf are you even talking about.
>>25386282sounds awesome, sign me up
