[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: esoterikKant.jpg (408 KB, 1092x832)
408 KB JPG
esoterik kantianism thread

i fucked off to twitter for a while but i kinda get bored there so now i'm back. anyone wanna talk about esoterik kantianism? help me pass the day at my boring af job. ok thank you
>>
>>25389162
hast du mich grade fotze genannt??
>>
>>25389190
entschulding, mein deutsch ist noch schlecht.
>>
>>25389162
Kant as a crypto-atheist shill that trusted the science, not an occultist or sorcerer.
>>
>>25389162
Maybe you should put down the phone and DO YOUR FUCKING JOB, huh, FAGGOT!? Ever think about doing THAT!?
>>
"Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel."

עִמָּנוּאֵל
"God is with us."

"Kante"
German for "the edge/brim"

Immanuel Kant: God is with us at the edge.
Gematria of עִמָּנוּאֵל is 197, 1+9+7=17
Critique of Pure Reason first published 1781, 1+7+8+1=17
>>
Take your meds.
>>
>>25389208
naw he was a scientific metaphysician based God believer. don't make me bring out my quotes.
>>
>>25389253
please do
>>
>>25389212
actually i did think about that but esoterik kantianism is more important right now.
>>
>>25389220
supreme basedness.
>>
>>25389239
i already am. you wouldn't believe my power levels when i'm off them.
>>
File: DerErkenner.jpg (35 KB, 482x271)
35 KB JPG
>>25389254
ok but only because you asked:

>the hypothesis of a wise author of the universe is necessary for my guidance in the investigation of nature—is the condition under which alone I can fulfil an end which is contingent indeed, but by no means unimportant. Moreover, since the result of my attempts so frequently confirms the utility of this assumption, and since nothing decisive can be adduced against it, it follows that it would be saying far too little to term my judgement, in this case, a mere opinion, and that, even in this theoretical connection, I may assert that I FIRMLY BELIEVE IN GOD.
-KdRV A826/B854
>>
When did you first became esoterik Kantian?
>>
>>25389317
probably like around the first time i read Kant
>>
>>25389286
what does he mean by god?
neo theism?
classical theism?
>>
>>25389354
>a wise author of the universe
>>
>>25389162
>(Sigma) + C
>5 statements
>empty domain
>Vladimir Lobovikov

Gets around Gödel, satisfies a vagrant Popper, and still keeps the marriage of geometry and metaphysics going. Allows for a rejection of Tau equivalence to avoid Crohnbach, doesn't do anything about the Pythagorean theorem which keeps strict empiricists from showing up.

>welcome back to the sithole.
>Sincerely, Nietzsche anon.
>>
>>25389394
hmm yes interesting
>>
>>25389394
Can you elaborate on this green text? I am genuinely intrigued.
>>
>>25389358
too vague, expand pls
>>
>>25389449
>wise
>author
>of the universe

wise=conscious, knowing, intelligent
author= creative, formative, artist
universe=the many turned into one


not vague at all really, if you have a 180iq like me tbqh
>>
>>25389460
>not vague at all really, if you have a 180iq like me tbqh
I'm guessing you believe in transcendental idealism; quiet down
>>
>>25389473
why yes how did you know?
>>
What is esoterik kantianism?
>>
>>25389706
a post-ironic occultist reading of Kant with hints of esoteric writing.
>>
Stop making this gay fucking thread you sperg. Get some new interests.
>>
>>25389910
that's part of being an autist. my fixed interest.
>>
>>25389950
Then stop being autistic, you just make others miserable by parading this tiresome shit.
>>
>>25389956
no can do fren. if you hate these threads ignore them for your own mental health. namaste.
>>
Why not just actual Kantianism instead?
>>
>>25391036
too limiting
>>
How is the system coming along?
>>
>>25389286
How does he justify this when God is beyond our intuition? In Prolegomena he uses his analogy argument but that only tells you about the relation between things, not about the thing in itself.
>>
>>25391301
it's convoluted and complicated, but it's grounded on the fact there is one transcendental idea we do intuit (although exoterically he denies it is an intuition since he prima facie limits intuition to the sensible), namely, our free will to deny the apparent necessary impulses of the flesh in order to accord with the moral law. second critique extrapolates on this much more than first critique. first critique just clears the ground for the second critique, but the second critique can also be read esoterically.
>>
File: IMG_7991.jpg (779 KB, 1125x1120)
779 KB JPG
>>25391283
much work to be done. damn you day job and life responsibilities, damn you to hell.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.