[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>read a shit mystery
>trope of someone saying "if you can guess the mystery in a book then its a bad book!"
>go to the end of the book
>tfw it'd exactly how I thought
What is the point of this?
>>
>>25389647
Is that the usual practice, to read the end first sometimes?
>>
>>25391514
NTA but I like to start "in media res" (I just open the book to a random page) and then I jump around every half chapter or so until I've read almost all of it
>>
>>25391514
It’s better that way.
>>
>if you can guess the mystery in a book then its a bad book!
If you can't guess the mystery in a book then its a bad book!
If you can guess the mystery in a book then its an okay book!
If you could have guessed the mystery in a book then its a good book!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.