Post textbooks for self-education. Bonus for:>the seven liberal arts>classical education>Trivium>Quadrivium>language>19th century booksI'll start:https://archive.org/details/childsillustrate00keet
>>25393827just lurk more on /lit/, 2-3 years and you wil be certified pseud
>>25393827Those ‘language by the natural method’ books are wonderful and align nicely with the zone of proximal development learning theory, I am currently working my way through ‘L’italiano Secondo Il Metodo Natura’
For young kids, Edward P. Moses's Number One Readerhttps://archive.org/details/mosesreadersnum00mosegoog/page/n6/mode/2upand First Reader with 4,000 Words for Spelling by Soundhttps://archive.org/details/firstreaderwith00mosegoog/page/n6/mode/2uphold up remarkably well, though they could still do with some updating, and a separate set of illustrationsIt really incenses me how little effort has been put into creating a comprehensive, cohesive, compact, sensible, ordered curriculum for English in particular (and to a somewhat lesser degree mathematics)I feel forced to do it myself
>>25393969These are not books for autodidacts.
>>25393924I made a thread on /pol/ a few days ago where I linked that book in the OP. Did you get it from there?
>>25393980No, i’ve been using their books for a few years, it’s my preferred way of language study. also stop using /pol/ you’ll find nothing decent there and only rot your brain
>>25393978neither is the book in the OP
>>25393991then post links
>>25393992yeah it is, maybe google what autodidact means
>>25393994maybe don't be a retarded faggot next time
>>25393827Autodidactism is based but I don't know what books to reccomend, encyclopedias are good.
>>25393995This thread is for adults who want to teach themselves, not teach their children. That book works very well for that, as the image in the OP shows and as you can see on the pages onward from the page in that image, which is this page:https://archive.org/details/childsillustrate00keet/page/20/mode/1upYour books are of no interest to anyone other than a parent or teacher teaching a small child, which is not to teach yourself.
>>25394021teach yourself to admit error instead of further embarrassing yourselfyou should have learned this as a small child
>>25393993I own the physical books
Priest's Logic: a very short introduction is a little rough but it worked for me.
>>25394056Leave>>25394062Post titles and authors of books or links. Vagueposting not welcome.
>>25394085Le Français Par La Méthode NatureDeutsch Nach Der NaturmethodeL'italiano Secondo Il Metodo NaturaLatin by the Natural MethodAll easily available on internet archive, if you are less monetarily inclined
>>25394117I know all those books. Just asked in case others wanted to know and in case there was a book in the series I had missed. Latin by the Natural Method by William Most is not published by the Nature Method Institutes as far as I know. Maybe you meant Familia Romana. https://archive.org/details/familia-romanaA similar book for Spanish is this:https://archive.org/details/newfirstspanishb00jamerich
>>25394149Nta, but I enjoyed "Poco a Poco: An Elementary Direct Method for Learning Spanish"https://archive.org/details/pocopocoelementa00hallrich/mode/2up
>>25394117>>25394356Check out theseFrenchhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/98ae65df102363389e715697b2832775Germanhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/4402dfb824853ccf06d456a09cc8f009Russianhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/7a912ebc799177f0c56660617ef1971eSpanishhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/f8024a0105df20bae5f2b311c401917bItalianhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/c978003645a26b54f7950b316dc17c48
>>25393969The big book of math is a good starter for algebra and create the foundation for calculus.
>>25394710Nigga, who ITT does not know fucking algebra?
>>25394834deliberately disruptive faggots like this are why light moderation rather than zero is superior>>25394710I'll check it out
bump
>>25394710based
>>25395142zero is superior, youre just too stupid to ignore nonsense.
>>25398757we'd all be better off entirely without you, it's that simplego on, make a positive contribution and prove me wrong
>>25394149Both Latin books are excellent and worth reading for beginners anyways.https://archive.org/details/cu31924032499455/page/n47/mode/2up
>>25398938your opinion is worth nothing, you are an aggro moron, and yet I don't want to ban you because your foolishness is self-evident, however, you want to ban me from speaking because of my supremely higher correctness, my very existence irritates you because you see me as being superior to you because I have access to truth you're too foolish to access, which you could very easily access but you enjoy foolishness too much to discard it, you are a fool.This is in fact the root of all desires to ban speech, your ideas cannot withstand any kind of critique, so you must ban all correct ideas, naturally, then you suffer for destroying the truth.
>>25399025>you must ban all correct ideasmetaphorically bursting into a room and shitting on the floor is apparently your notion of a 'correct idea'you've been directly asked to produce anything of value and instead resorted immediately to insults that betray your linguistic povertysee the post above yours? that's how little it takes to not be a faggot
>>25399025Work on your prose.
>>25399272Whatever, I will speak and you will shit yourself attempting to ban me, blow it out your ass tyrant.
Euclidean mathematics through illustrationshttps://archive.org/details/firstsixbooksofe00byrn/page/n15/mode/1up
>>25394704Thank you, Anon. I’ve just had a skim through a few of these and they look great.
>>25393827Is this a good resource? I've been following along for quite a while now. I'm currently halfway through Sidney Greenbaum's Grammar book.
>>25402868Not if you want to study the Trivium. Skip English grammar and study Latin grammar and general grammar.
Latinhttps://archive.org/details/latinforbeginner0000benj
>>25403045Once proficiency is attained in Latin, should you come back to English grammar?
>>25403045>general grammarYou mean like a broad linguistic book from someone like Chomsky?
>>25403531no>>25403547Chomsky is an anti-Trivium brainwashing plant, avoid.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3U6MsdBalgStudy Latin, it gives you a knowledge of general grammar. The grammar in the Trivium was Latin grammar. The "Trivium" that contains English grammar is just larp.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49Zeo4Qbw8Yhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivial_schoolhttps://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/530779621/#530780108There are also books on general grammar likehttps://archive.org/details/principlesgener00roemgooghttps://archive.org/details/principlesgener00sacygooghttps://archive.org/details/the-trivium-the-liberal-arts-of-logic-grammar-and-rhetoric-sister-miriam-josephhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/293317a0cff0415702f0cced377b0a57https://libgen.li/edition.php?id=137309368
>>25403050>https://archive.org/details/latinforbeginner0000benjthank you! in a thread months or maybe even a year ago, somebody posted a beginners latin book that was very much in the style of the french example in the OC of this thread. I thought i bookmarked it but now I can't find it. Does anyone know what I am talking about?
>>25403826I don't know a book for Latin that looks like that exactly but if you mean having the English words underneath then that's called interlinear or Hamiltonian system, there are many books with that, here's one.https://archive.org/details/CommentariesOnTheGallicWarCaesarCompletelyParsedBookIsome more herehttps://www.latinum.org.uk/shadowing/interlinear-method
>>25403816what point is this image making?"English doesn't have a lot of inflectional morphology"weknowdis
>>25403833thank you I had no idea! these are great.
>>25403841Stfu and study Latin
>>25403816After doing a little searching, it seems that Latin and ancient Greek were traditionally paired as the cornerstone of "The Classics." Should I study the two together, or does Latin alone suffice?
>>25403816Why should Latin be more important than learning English? Why would Latin grammar have anything more special about it than English grammar? From my perspective, Latin just seems like a dead language that no one uses anymore.
>>25404455I suggest you begin with Latin and study Greek later. Another book to check out is Familia Romana with supplementary books and audio.Familia Romanahttps://archive.org/details/familia-romanaaudiohttps://archive.org/details/familia-romana-and-colloquia-personarum-audio-files>>>/t/1344565Neumann Companionhttps://annas-archive.gl/md5/920df5a7359b4222dd56dafe1a84572fExercitia Latinahttps://archive.org/details/lingualatinalatinbooks/Lingua%20Latina%20-%20Exercitia%20Latina%20Pars%20I/Colloquia Personarumhttps://archive.org/details/lingualatinalatinbooks/Lingua%20Latina%20-%20Colloquia%20Personarum/answer keyhttps://archive.org/details/lingualatinalatinbooks/Lingua%20Latina%20-%20Teacher%27s%20Materials%20and%20Answer%20Keys/Unrelated but also for Latin:https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/collection/latin-grammar/Here's a book for Greek:https://archive.org/details/CrosbySchaeffer_archive
>>25404634Much richer grammar than English
I found this Latin primer which has grammar instruction interspersed with interlinear reading sections.https://archive.org/details/latinprimerafir02allegoog
>>25404679English can convey everything Latin can. It just relies more on word order and auxiliaries as opposed to inflectional morphology.Your hate boner for the language you're using is fascinating.
>>25404696Then keep using English only and gtfo out of this thread, uncultured swine.
>>25404676Thanks!
>>25400182https://annas-archive.gl/md5/d45ff5e6b85ca30bde1ba1925320c4f8https://elements.ratherthanpaper.com/1.1https://youtu.be/XLlThlqCFeghttps://elements.ratherthanpaper.com/1.2https://youtu.be/UHZO2dviZfUhttps://elements.ratherthanpaper.com/1.3https://youtu.be/_ZwcobIExtohttps://www.desmos.com/geometryhttps://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-jan-30-oe-crease30-story.htmlhttps://archive.org/details/euclid_heath_2nd_ed/1_euclid_heath_2nd_ed/page/n254
