Romantic Abjection by Danielle Chelosky.
Here's the novella's plot summary
>>25403425>snail trail going all the way up the ribsgotta love hairy hebrew harlots>>25403429>a hit of weednigga please
>>25403429What a gripping synopsis...
>>25403425Do some crunches next time before photoing your lumpy challah dough body and rub some tanning lotion on
>>25403429Women have such a hard time not talking about themselves.
>>25403425Is that L I T E R A T U R E?!?! Aaaah I love literature, I love fondling literature, caressing literature, burying my face deep in literature. Literature is what I live for, desu.
AWOOGA BOOBA HUMMA HUMINA AAA I LOVE BOOBS I LOVE BOOBS
>>25403425A new book? A new thirst trap? I thought she changed :(
Please stop giving whores attention.
>>25403429That description is so bad I dont feel bad for any of the things said about her here
>>25403429>a hit of weedFuck off.
Looks like a trannie.
>>25404006Quit watching porn
Where do I find a woman like her?
>>25404034The swineyard
>>25404034You could literally just meet her. She's not an unreachable star, just go to New York lit events.
>>25404034Backpage
>>25404021Looks like a trannie.
>>25404021Shan't
>>25403429Sounds good, like some PKD shit.
>>25403425Danielle, or Danielle's publicist, her street team, whatever, please stop posting here, you're better than this. Or maybe you're not, but regardless please stop
>>25404152>Sounds goodIt doesn't. >like some PKD shitDefinitely not. You're retarded.
>>25404021"She" does though.
>>25403425Danielle, or Danielle's publicist, her street team, whatever, please keep posting here. But you're better than this, so post less about the book and more about the boobs.
>>25403425next time get the pits in the picture
She doesn't know the meaning of romantic abjection, yet
She gets off on us calling her a worthless whore. Probably shlicking to thread as we speak.
>>25403425Any new happy trail, forearm hair, leg hair, armpit hair, mustache or nipple hair pics?
>>25403429>Anna Dorn knows about Tao Lin>Anna Dorn knows about Danielle Chelosky
Women that vaguely look like me face-wise piss me the fuck off to no end and I don't know why.
>>25404395I'd be pissed looking at your face too.
She's not even pretty.
>>25403425How many times are you going to make these posts about her?
>>25404406Jews get extra credit for having pale skin and blue eyes cause they know they aren't supposed to have them
>>25404406>Ugh, she's like.. NOT. EVEN. PRETTY!!!! Okay, 14 year old girl.
>>25404410Are you describing her fanbase?
>>25404411I'm describing the energy your post exuded.
>>25404410Why do you simp for free?
>>25404415What about my post is simping? Mongoloid word by the way, grow up.
>>25404416Quit making threads about yourself on /lit/Go away you ugly bitch.
>>25404419I am a random man, I just find your posts retarded and exuding a certain energy I dislike. Very feminine.
>>25404413I didn't post that though.
>>25404422Quit making these threads.
>>25404416>What about my post is simping?You're obviously a trannie who's has a weird parasocial attraction to "deep" thots, anon.
>>25404425I did not. I'll probably make one now though. >>25404424Aight young jit then keep that shit tight before you get zipped up fn
>>25404428Sick fan fiction. >who's has
>>25404431But it's obvious, anon. You're a trannie who built up a weird parasocial attraction to Ms. Deep Thot and feel the need to defend her in front of strangers on the internet. Pathetic doesn't even cover it.
>>25404435You really do have the diction of a early 20s mean girl. It's not defending her to point this out.
>>25404439>You really do have the diction of a early 20s mean girlYou tried that on the other guy and it didn't land. >It's not defending her to point this out.Lol, simp.
>>25404447>didn't land >in front of You're not performing for anyone bro. >simp Nothing simp about my posts. You're talking about her more than I am while fantasizing I'm a tranny.
>>25404451>You're not performing for anyone broLol, you just tried to call me a "performative male". >Nothing simp about my postsLol, simp. >I'm a trannyWe know. Buy an ad.
>>25404458You've given up. I win.
>>25404463>I winSimps never win, bro.
>>25404386I just googled who that is and she looks like everything wrong with books and publishing
>>25403429>tao lindropped
>>25403425Almost nothing that uses tits for marketing is ever any good. Conan the Barbarian is an exception. I doubt this faggy Jewish book is an exception.
>>25403429writing about writers is more masturbatory than actually masturbating, and I wish people shamed the practice without Mercy. It's like mangas about manga authors creating manga, holy shit get over yourself.
>>25404409It's definitely about the socio-historical anachronism of her being a Jew with pale skin and blue eyes and not those massive squishy honkers, straight bro.
>>25404409Jews with pale skin and blue eyes probably are only marginally ethnically Jewish, even more so than the average Ashkenazi, which is basically just a pole with really big teeth.
>>25403429I like how the second quote is just an insult and they still included it on the back of the book.
>>25404470>/lit/ranny hates an authorYeah, she is great.
>>25403425Lose weight
>>25403425>>25403429Every time I see writers writing about writers I think this truly is a dead medium. It's for circlejerking people talking to each other with nothing to say, re-afferming their own position as artists in a craft nobody cares about.Writing will be resurrect (if ever) when these people start looking outside and writing about others.
>>25403425Any on ebay?
>>25404981doesn't come out until late september
>>25404957>>25404386I also just googled Anna Dorn. She sounds like an awful, performative, lesbian writer, who write for the tumblr and reddit gossip crowd. I can't fathom why you'd enjoy her work, or think it's artistically valuable, unless you're a female Swiftie. She seems to just be outputting slop for the lowest common order of women.
>>25405205>awfulPoisoning the well>performativeSo... Good? Elitism is often times disregarded as performativity. /lit/ of all places should like it because of it.>lesbianHot, but what does that have to do with the literature she is going to write? If anything, shouldn't it be also good? Virginia Woolf is the only female author that is worthy of being in the Canon and she was lesbian (probably also because she wasn't writing romance slop 24/7).>who write for the tumblr and reddit gossip crowd.How would you know who she writes for? Is it because you found that one of her books is about that group of people? >I can't fathom why you'd enjoy her work, or think it's artistically valuable, unless you're a female Swiftie.Do you think American Psycho can only be enjoyed by investment bankers, because that's what it talks about? Do you realise that both books are parodies, critiques of that group of people? It's even in the name of the novels (American Psycho, American Dreams). You've called her performative and you didn't notice that?>outputting slopAren't you contraddicting yourself, since you already called her performative? >the lowest common order of women.I thought that was romance slop. Besides, why would retarded women read a book that, of all things, is making fun of them?
>>25405240>American DreamsAmerican Spirits*
>>25405244>>25405240Amazing. You said not one meaningful thing about any of her books. Let me try again. Explain why she is a good author. Use one or more of her books as an example. Be specific.
>>25405256>You said not one meaningful thing about any of her books.Because that's not the point of my post.The goal was to tackle every criticism you put forward. Considering that you are now changing topics, that means that I was correct in every single one of my takes. I accept your concession.>Explain why she is a good author. Use one or more of her books as an example. Be specific.What do you mean by "be specific"? Were you and me specific enough already?The fact that, as in American Psycho, Dorn is able to depict, caricaturize and self-fagocitate the group of people it laughs at. The love for the ideal, the ideal that clashes with reality, and how the author wants to kill reality, but instead kills the ideal. Isn't that already "artistically valuable"?
>>25405305>Were youWeren't you*
>>25405308Only redditors correct typos and think it's a mic drop moment when they point out you've made one.
>>25405313Don't they have the edit function?
>>25404979I hate that too, it's all over poetry. Old poets used to do it too and these people think it gives them license.
