It’s not even that racist honestly
>>25406330its in dua lipas banned books library, so yeah, it is controversial as heck
>>25406330The real reason it's hard to find isn't because it's mega racist. First off, it just didn't sell very well when it came out. Then in the mid 90s the rights were acquired by a pro-eugenics super racist who tried to make it the 'official' book of his movement. The Raspail estate didn't like that so they revoked the English rights and just sat on them for years.The reason you're hearing about it again is because in 2025 the rights were reacquired and the new publisher had a publicity stunt where they pretended Amazon was banning them for mega racism.
I liked the part where he described how they're shitting on the boat. My mother read it out loud to me and we both laughed.
>>25406330Modern racism would make Laffont deeply uncomfortable because it's le proleish.
>>25406416the publisher?
>>25406421Yes, as with Antelope Press.
>>25406330From the way you retards talk about this book, I thought that it would be way more transgressive, challenging, and shocking than it actually was. It was a lot of hysterical screeching coupled with a strange fixation on human shit. Does anyone actually think that it's a good novel, or is it just that it's le heckin based so its aesthetic quality is irrelevant?
>>25406510the migrants are indians
>>25406510Someone post some Indian poop gifs for this clueless nigga
>>25406408People never mention how funny it is, but the whole book is hilarious.
>>25406330doesn't he end the novel with a "based" Indian saying he doesn't want anymore Indian immigrants and he's not like them, he's like the white people?
>>25406407So can you buy the English version on amazon? Or is it not for sale and constantly de-listed?
where are the modern novels that have messaging against non-whites, like this? without the weird tokens muddying the waters.
>>25406575Yeah, it was only down one time for maybe 12 hours back in April, and only because there was confusion over the copyright.It's been up ever since, it's like $20. You can even grab the audiobook if you want.
>>25406330Recently learned it's a very French type of satire that lampoons everyone. (Kind of like Gargantua and Pantagruel, no?) Great take from Feral as usualhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iQb3Uu4jgU>>25406407Big reason it's gaining notoriety is that the zionists decided to make it happen. They were already flooding the West with North Africans and Middle Easterners, at first they were supposed to be "climate refugees" but they were obviously fleeing the wars the US were lighting up. The wave of Indians and Haitians etc. are just Zionists sponsoring these people to come and sap the last of the social safety nets before the planned big crash. They on purpose went to their lower caste "street shitters" with this charity.
>>25406670Raspail takes from Bloy and de Maistre a lot. To say that he "lampoons everyone" I think is missing the point. He is disgusted by contemporary French society.
>>25406330The author clearly describes browns as an invasive species making everything worse. It leaves very little to the imagination, and it does happens by the end. However the browns are basically a non-sentient destructive force. Raspail doesn't insist on them more than needed because the central theme of the book is the psychology of the cucks that desire, embracing or plan the brownification, and their repression of any dissent against it. >>25406570The based pajeet knows very well he's still a jeet, he merely chooses death over living among his fellow jeets.
>>25406510Pretty much yeah. It's one of those books far righters are informally obligated to pretend are good. Not that pretending bad works of art are actually good because of social convention is confined to them.
>>25406510Which novels would you say are actually transgressive, challenging, and shocking?
The fact that we can’t even talk about immigration or demographics proves that the human race is more tribal, emotional, than logical or critical.
>>25406330It exposes the contradiction of liberalism and pro-immigrant policies. Nobody can look at the state of Europe today and say the naiveté about immigration has worked out. It's no longer a right wing talking point, it's a phenomenological reality.
>>25407011>The fact that we can’t even talk about immigration or demographics proves that the human race is more tribal, emotional, than logical or critical.We can talk about immigration or demographics. The problem is when we do, one side refuses to be logical or critical about it.As an example>A: immigrants cost taxpayers money>B: immigrants are taxpayers, plenty of groups cost taxpayers money, and the children of immigrants completely offset the spending imbalance on their parentsor>A: immigrants cost taxpayers housing>B: a massive % of housing is built and maintained by immigrantsor>A: immigrants cost taxpayers jobs>B: Immigrants wouldn't be more competitive for jobs if they had the same protections as citizen workers. They would be less competitive. Creating an underground market for immigrant labor and stripping protections from immigrants causes the problem you are trying to solve.or>A: immigrants are committing more crime>B: That varies by country. In some, such as America, that isn't true. In others, such as the UK, that higher crime rate is driven by immigrants being more young, poor, and male than the general population, and when you control for those factors, their crime rates are completely normal.>A: That's just cause immigrants are being protected by the police>B: Data shows the complete opposite. Immigrant communities are policed much more heavily and immigrants are far more likely to have negative encounters with law enforcement and courts when they end up dealing with the system. You are basing this opinion on cherry-picked news stories and personal biases.
>>25407036I mean. You’re not wrong. One side is noticeably more emotionally charged and unwilling to actually analyze the issue.
>>25407036Immigration is about aesthetics, it's just weird to see Indians everywhere
>>25407036Let’s look at the UK…Here are the opinions of British muslims in statistic form:- Only 17% think it is undesirable that women take a more traditional role in society- Only 27% say it would be undesirable to outlaw gay marriage (compared to 60% of the wider public)- Only 28% say it would be undesirable to outlaw homosexuality in the UK (compared to 62% of the public as a whole)- Only 26% say it would be undesirable to outlaw abortion, compared to 63% of the public as a whole- Only 35% say it would be undesirable to legalise polygamy, compared to 70% of the publicSource: https://henryjacksonsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/HJS-Deck-200324-Final.pdf~23% want to see Sharia law in some areas of UK life vs <5% of General Public supporting any religious law influencing the UK legal system.Cousin marriage is culturally common among communities vs 90% of General Public opposing it.~78% want to see laws protecting those who insult Islam punished vs General Public where ~8% support.~20% sympathized with motives behind Charlie Hebdo attackers~39% believe wives should "always obey" their husbands (no stat on General Public with this one, but it's worth noting)~52% think homosexuality should be illegal vs ~80-85% of General Public who support same-sex relationships~33% support the death penalty for apostasy (leaving Islam) vs General Public where there is no stat since probably it would be 0%Sources:PolicyExchange/London poll (2007)ICM poll (for Channel4) (2016)Ipsos MORI review (2018) YouGov poll (2023)
>>25407036Lol
>>25407036Lmao even
>>25407036Merkel more like Merkek
>>25407054Muslims have the correct take on women and gays.
>>25407036Bahahaha
>>25407011The big problem is precisely that we talk about "immigration" which, by itself, is a bureaucratic non issue the discussion of which leads to dinsingenuous retarded posts such as >>25407036 (which is still incorrect but let's not insist on that). Before 1850 you could go form Portugal to the edges of the russian empire without showing papers, international migration happened all the time with often minimal hurdle. Some highly sought after destinations like the US put a minimum of restrictions that had little to do with citizenship, and those came up later in its history. The problems are racial, religious and cultural. All of this makes the situation extremely clear, but many people don't like that clarity, they want the situation to be (publicly and officially) unreadable by being framed in terms of travelling, so it is all muddied into that stupid talk about immigration.
>>25407054>Only 17% think it is undesirable that women take a more traditional role in societyBased>- Only 27% say it would be undesirable to outlaw gay marriage (compared to 60% of the wider public)Based>- Only 28% say it would be undesirable to outlaw homosexuality in the UK (compared to 62% of the public as a whole)Based>- Only 26% say it would be undesirable to outlaw abortion, compared to 63% of the public as a whole.Based>- Only 35% say it would be undesirable to legalise polygamy, compared to 70% of the publicBased.>~39% believe wives should "always obey" their husbands (no stat on General Public with this one, but it's worth noting)Based>~52% think homosexuality should be illegal vs ~80-85% of General Public who support same-sex relationshipsKinda based desu senpai . If your goal was to make me like Muslims more, you might be succeeding.
>>25407065Dominica's total population is 70k, let alone the total population of them in fucking Germany. Fucking one of them commits a crime and their crime rate will explode.See this is the sort of bad data interpretation I'm talking about. This chart exists to lie.
>>25407105>t. doesn't know how to read stats
I like all the shit he piles on hippie third world Catholics in the book. Very prescient
>>25407085Consider moving to one of those shitholes then instead of the West?
>>25407036>If you control for these factors then immigrants commit the same amount of crimeAh, yes Mtumbo and Ahmed, both coming from war torn shitholes commit the same amount of crime as John and Steve. Who are trying to fool you Jew.
>>25406977Hegel’s Logik
>>25407342>novels
>>25406670>Recently learned it's a very French type of satire that lampoons everyone. (Kind of like Gargantua and Pantagruel, no?)I read Archeofuturism after Camp of the Saints and was imminently disillusioned with the European right.
>>25407036
>>25407036How is it possible to be this stupidThere have been multiple studies and they all show the same thing.You like grouping all immigrants together. People from Congo and Sudan together with the Japanese and Swede. Oh look at that, on net they bring in taxes!Look just a bit deeper and you can make distinction in types of immigrants.You're a subhuman if you make arguments like the ones you're making.
>>25407342>Oh Jesus I need to name an author to sound enlightened and intelligent, no matter what a non sequitur it might be>Umm Uhh>"HEGEL SPOKE OF THIS"
>>25407060>>25407061>>25407065>India is in the green.My country's izzat is saved. Thank Allah.
>>25407415That’s just because they haven’t imported enough yet
>>25407036Yes let's allow our countries to decay into economic zones where ethnic strife is employed as a means to keep wages down, as a last "fuck you" to the people whose ancestors built this country and wanted their offspring to prosper in it (IE not be imprisoned for posting about rape gangs). Fuckwit.
>>25407266>be ahmed or mtumbo>rape or kill someone and get deported / imprisoned for yearscrime count: 1>be dave>have a few speeding tickets over his 30 years of going to work>crime count: more than ahmedsee how easy it is to manipulate statistics?
>>25406699>browns as an invasive species making everything worse. It leaves very little to the imagination, and it does happens by the end. However the browns are basically a non-sentient destructive force.>the psychology of the cucks that desire, embracing or plan the brownification, and their repression of any dissent against it.damn he dropped two trukes?
>>25407552Raspail was a truth nuke delivery service. Remember he wrote this in 1973. Some anon ITT says it doesn't feel transgressive enough because his discourse has been bowdlerized to hell and back since then to enter mass consciousness (in a nearly unrecognizable trannty state to make it palatable to retards). He was operating on (in fact he largely defined) 2010s memetics when the average "educated" person in the west still argued about the imminent threat of the soviet union, and imagined Ghandi when speaking of Indians. He was truth nuke express despite it going against his interests or tastes. For instance he had terminal jungle fever and really loved brown and even black women as lovers but still faced the need of making babies with (Jesus forgives me for uttering this expression) White w*men. He also was very Catholic but couldn't not notice and call out the subversive action of the Church on this front (the Church in France in the 70s sided with the then few muslims as some sort of God knows what "believer" allies against the rising humano-nihilist atheism, the celrgy wouldn't get redpilled until 2005 or so).
>>25407415Indians subvert from within, like the women they are.
>>25407626Are you implying women are cowards? No wonder you keep losing to them if you can't respect their abilities.We, on the other hand, absolutely are sneaky cowards. Wait till we corner the top managerial positions.
>>25406330Outside of its politics, does this book actually have any literary merit? Does the prose read good?
>>25406818Its a funny book and Indians are poop goblin destroyers.
>>25408455Not really. Like most far right propaganda, it only targets your disgust response. It has no aesthetic value.
>>25406977>transgressive, challenging, JunkyLolitaAncient Evenings (Norman Mailer) >shocking?The Wasp Factory>transgressive, challenging, shocking?120 Days of SodomNaked LunchThe End of Alice
>>25408624>muh sex stuff is... le transgressive!!It's 2026. Literally the only sex-related topic you could explore that today's readership and cultural establishment would find shocking is a novel about an incel character written in a sympathetic manner
>>25408641Oh and also a novel about an age gap. Let's say 28M + 18F.Lolita comes the closest to this but is too canonized to be transgressive.
>>25408455The ending is a very enjoyable farcical situation, there isn't anything like it I can think of, the great resistance to the invasion is so unbelievably pointless, larpy, harsh, and petty, it is destroyed so casually, there isn't anything I can think of which captures the same feeling. Everything before the ship actually lands is a bit dull.
>>25406407>it's mega racist.Kys.
>>25407589It's almost as if satire has a valuable place in society, where you can use it to point out some problems surrounding you without it feeling like you're attacking or subverting the stuff you're around, exist in or happen to be.
>>25407036>immigrants are taxpayers, plenty of groups cost taxpayers money, and the children of immigrants completely offset the spending imbalance on their parentsUntrue. Children themselves are subsidized by the state and immigrants bring in elderly family members. This creates immediate strain on social programmes.>a massive % of housing is built and maintained by immigrantsUntrue. Western countries experiencing mass immigration are currently experiencing housing crises specifically because of immigration.>Immigrants wouldn't be more competitive for jobs if they had the same protections as citizen workers. They would be less competitive. Creating an underground market for immigrant labor and stripping protections from immigrants causes the problem you are trying to solve.Untrue. Flooding the labour market depresses wages while also degrading quality of service.>That varies by country. In some, such as America, that isn't true. In others, such as the UK, that higher crime rate is driven by immigrants being more young, poor, and male than the general population, and when you control for those factors, their crime rates are completely normal.Untrue. Western countries are currently experiencing racialized crime be it Muslim grooming gangs in the UK, Indian gangs like the Bishnoi in Canada, and Somali fraudsters in the US. There's also events like the country wide mass rapes/sexual assaults that took place in Germany on New Year's Eve 2015.>Data shows the complete opposite. Immigrant communities are policed much more heavily and immigrants are far more likely to have negative encounters with law enforcement and courts when they end up dealing with the system. You are basing this opinion on cherry-picked news stories and personal biases.No, retard. You'd never even heard of the grooming gangs until recently, you didn't know that organized crime groups like Bishnoi existed until I just mentioned it above, you'll likely dismiss the fraud in the US by saying "other people do it too", and you completely forgot about the mass rapes in Germany because you're an NPC and it was memoryholed.Fuck you, retard.
>>25409162Did you just sit here replying to lazy day-old bait?
>>25406330The preface makes it seem like it's gonna get pretty racist..............................
>>25406330that book in this collection>>25409263
>>25406330I actually have been reading this and I don't get the racist vibe either. It's sort of like watching one of those documentaries on third world countries
>>25409128it's not mega racist. that's the point i'm making. the grifters just pretended that's why it was banned so that the reactionary right would go "but my freedom!!!!" and spend $50 on the hardback copy from their websitethe audiobook is included free with your subscription to Amazon Prime. trying to pretend this a subversive, even secretive book is misguided.
>>25409162>Untrue. Children themselves are subsidized by the state and immigrants bring in elderly family members. This creates immediate strain on social programmes.This isn't a counterargument, lmao. I didn't say the children of immigrants don't cost tax revenue in gross. I said in the net they don't, and also they offset the net cost of preceding immigrant generation when combined with revenue from immigrants themselves. The children of immigrants tend to be incredibly upwardly mobile economically and as such generate a lot of revenue for the state compared with immigrants...or citizens.Also what a dumbass argument, literally bitching about caring for children. How's it feel to be evil AND stupid?
>>25406416Never understood this take. Seems like just an excuse to bring out the killing fields.
>>25407085The only issue they worship the wrong God and are not fair skinned. It is what it is.
>>25409296>This isn't a counterargumentIt is. The children are subsidized by the state increasing the burden on the social safety net. This alongside the importation of elderly family members completely negates the supposed "tax benefits" of importing massive waves of immigrants. Add to this that the top 10% pay the majority of taxes (e.g. 70% in the US) and the burden comes even more into focus. You're retarded. Post your propaganda on Reddit where people are dumb enough to fall for it and anyone who isn't will get banned for calling out your bullshit.
>>25409296every time there's a study on this, it concludes that they're a net drain. that's not even getting into the opportunity cost of them. having immigrants working at e.g., grocery stores sounds great until you realize these are entry-level jobs for young people that are now gone. so you get insane shit like 100 applicants to shit-tier jobs. so even the work they do do isn't actually work a lot of the time, they're just rendering other people unemployed so that these people then end up on welfare
>>25409450>every time there's a study on this, it concludes that they're a net drainYou mean every time there's an honest study. Most of the time they don't normalize for tax brackets in order to make it seem like they're paying more taxes when the reality is they're part of a segment that takes the most out of benefits while contributing far less than the higher brackets. They'll say things like:>Immigrants are responsible for 25% of non-zero income filed in X country but are only 20% of the population but the reality is the bracket they're in doesn't pay most of the taxes while it takes advantage of programmes (e.g. subsidized or "free" healthcare, public housing, child benefits, etc) and various credits made specifically for them.
>>25409450>>25409480Oh, they're also not counting illegals at all (obviously) nor do they factor in the depreciation of wages and the burden on overall real income.
>>25409450>every time there's a study on this, it concludes that they're a net drainAgain, not a rebuttal, learn2read. I said they're a net drain, dipshit.>>25409434> The children are subsidized by the state increasing the burden on the social safety netLearn the difference between gross and net. Fucking everyone is a drain on the system before they start working. That's why we have a fucking system.>Add to this that the top 10% pay the majority of taxes (e.g. 70% in the US) and the burden comes even more into focus.What part of upwardly mobile did you not understand?
>>25409620>Learn the differenceAgain, the strain on social programmes is immediate and you fail to consider the importation of elderly family members. Canada put out a special programme to prioritize elderly family members, lol >everyone is a drain on the system before they start workingSome more than others as I pointed out above. Immigrants aren't part of the tax bracket that contributes the lion's share of revenue while they are part of the bracket that takes advantage of various credits, benefits, and write-offs. >What part of upwardly mobileThis is a myth from a time when immigrants with established wealth were prioritized, anon. Now we're seeing massive waves of migrants working jobs that used to be filled by high schoolers and retirees who wanted to stay busy. Again: you're retarded. Sell your propaganda elsewhere you dumb NPC faggot.
>>25407036You’re why the western world is rotting.You’re like Destiny. “What do you even mean that immigration is a problem? What do you even mean that there’s too many immigrants? What do you even mean by that?”. Don’t be disingenuous on purpose, asshole.
>>25407036I hope a migrant culturally enriches your entire family.
>>25407069>Before 1850 you could go form Portugal to the edges of the russian empire without showing papersSo pretty much before the advent of the nation-state as the geopolitical norm at a time when the vast majority of people never travelled more than 15 miles away from where they were born. Fuck you're stupid.
Browns rape more. This is mathematically a fact of life. If you deny it, you have a mental sickness. Maybe your heart is in the right (“right”) place, but your survival instincts are dangerously low.
>>25407036This board needs a good slap upside the head every now and again. Otherwise it becomes a stultifying chud echo chamber
>>25410036>thinly veiled samefagCalling that a "slap upside the head" was one of the attempts at salvaging izzat I've seen in my life.
>>25410036>echochambers in favor of mass immigration and attacking those that aren't aren't the status quoDelusional.
>>25409987I mean when you hear stories of indians raping komodo dragons you kind of wonder why you even want them in your country
>>25410052You won't believe the screenshot lmfao but I'll provide it anyway. Sorry anon, better luck next time>>25410076>nooooo my heckin safe space reeeeeee
>>25410094You would've been better off just accepting the accusation since agreeing with that idiot makes you look worse.
>>25410036>This board needs a good slap upside the head every now and againyou sound like a fag desu
>>25410083Jesus Christ. Those poor lizards.
>>25410094You're such a rebel, bro! You updoot those neoliberal talking points!
>>25410083>>25410125>In April 2022, four poachers in Maharashtra, India, were arrested after they were found to have gang-raped, killed, and eaten a protected Bengal monitor lizard (a species closely related to the Komodo dragon). Forest officials discovered the footage on the men's mobile phones while investigating them for trespassingThey even ate it afterwards.
>>25406330It's garbage xenophobic pulp fiction. A racist boomer fantasy about brown hordes invading Europe. You might as well be reading Tom Clancy dogshit about MURICA saving the day. The fact that you 20-something American "intellectuals" in 2026 are sitting around analyzing this xenophobic airport-thriller trash as if it is high literature tells you everything you need to know about the supposed anglo-saxon neoreactionary vanguard we have heard oh so much about.
>>25410179yeah, submission mogs this
>>25408641>>25408644Most of those are violent as well as sexually gratuitous, poser.
>>25410179>waah it's xenophobicIs that seriously the critique you're going for
>>25410187
>>25410133>conservatism is the REAL counterculture n sheit
>>25410247
>>25406330It's double secret ultra mega Hitler racist
>>25410036Lol you type like a cunt
>>25406330its not about immigration, its about the concept that the french all hate each other too much to do anything. the americans are the same way
>>25410205It really is such a funny insult. By what moral law are we compelled to love foreign things? I'm a Christian myself, so I can certainly understand the notion of omnibenevolence, but we love everyone because we're all the same at our core; the differences we have due to heredity aren't things we are obligated to love.
>>25410036If someone calls you an insane, anti-human, anti-civilization Marxist freak you seriously need to come up with better insults than "chud" or "rightoid." Good Lord you miserable specimens are such utterly unengaging opponents.
>>25410179>fantasy
>>25410179why haven't leftist retard faggots ever written a single novel about the utopia that will be created from endless shitskin migration?
>>25409800I wasn't being disingenuous. I directly addressed your arguments. Which is why you didn't put forward a counterargument. You just likened me to a sexual predator I don't even like.>>25409669>Again, the strain on social programmes is immediate and you fail to consider the importation of elderly family membersAgain, I'm not failing to consider the importation of elderly family members. I directly fucking address the immigrant generation.>Some more than others as I pointed out above. Immigrants aren't part of the tax bracket that contributes the lion's share of revenue while they are part of the bracket that takes advantage of various credits, benefits, and write-offs.I said that bullshit.>This is a myth from a time when immigrants with established wealth were prioritized, anon. Now we're seeing massive waves of migrants working jobs that used to be filled by high schoolers and retirees who wanted to stay busy.Again, I'm talking about the next generation, you fucking illiterate gibbon.God damn, no fucking wonder you're worried about bringing in immigrants when you can't even fucking read your own fucking language.
>>25410661You tried I guess. Better luck next time.
>>25410661>Again, I'm not failing to consider the importation of elderly family members. I directly fucking address the immigrant generation.You completely fail to address it and you're ignoring immediate strain on social programmes due to unprecedented mass immigration. You simply assert that one generation makes up the deficit for that prior which is an obvious case of "I can have my cake and eat it too" nonsense. The strain is immediate and the volume of immigration is unprecedented. >I said that bullshitDid you mean to write "that's"? Hand waving isn't a counterargument, anon. The fact is that arguments toward the effect that immigrants expand the tax base neglect to factor in the relative weight of the tax bracket they fall into. Also, such an argument isn't suitable to unprecedented mass immigration but rather prior controlled immigration. The top 10% of earners pay well over half of all income tax.>Again, I'm talking about the next generationYes. I've directly addressed this by pointing out that myth applies to prior immigration patterns, not the unprecedented mass immigration we see today. I also brought up the fact the strain is in the here and now and you've completely ignored this fact under the assumption it will magically alleviate itself. >REEEEEEEEEEAnon, it's quite obvious you lack the ability to think critically and are only able to regurgitate talking points that seemingly support the worldview into which you've indoctrinated yourself. If you were a smarter person you could just admit that mass immigration harms everyone below the upper middle class. However, what you end up doing is accidentally admitting such is the case in asserting "it will work out eventually".You're a moron, anon.
>>25410036>>25407036My country's airport got blown up by "migrants". Elsewhere, the metro station got bombed by you guessed it... "migrants". We also have a former safe cities becoming rape hubs where these "migrants" would literally film it, get a few months maybe but ACTUALLY they're underage and we should let them go because it's their culture. Most of them are unemployed too, by the way. At far more concerning rates than the natives who actually care about the direction of our country.How come things like these have never happened before we started allowing shitskins/muslims in? Is having deliveroo wogs bringing you your pizza really worth your safety and happiness?
>>25410313>you have to be as mad as I am because... because... I'M UPSET
>>25410036Chuds are the intellectual superiors to all flavors of leftists and should predominate in any intellectual space.
>>25410893Don't make me post the chart showing a positive correlation between IQ score and likelihood of left-wing political beliefs
>>25410982whoa buddy IQ? isn't that racist because it shows that brownies score lower? take your chud shit to >>>/pol/
>>25410982What about the IQ studies that show blacks have a genetically lower IQ?
>>25411009>>25410994Systemic factors. Adjust for environment. They were oppressed and deprived of basic nutrition by white colonial powers. Today, we are seeing the Flynn effect and the equalization of scores, IQ, status, etc thanks to equality policies that have had time to take hold. Let’s not forget that equal rights for minorities have only been in place since the 1960s. And we are still working on it.
>>25411015epic
>>25410982Above-average IQ isn't a shield against indoctrination and having a superiority complex increases the likelihood of holding false beliefs. You just told on yourself, midwit.
>>25411015>Adjust for environmentHigh income blacks have the same SAT scores as lower-middle income whites, retard. >Let’s not forget that equal rights for minorities have only been in place since the 1960sBlacks are worse off than they were before the 1960s, brainlet. It's bad enough useful idiots like you aid in the destruction of the world but the fact you're delusional enough to pat yourselves on the back while doing it is insufferable. By the way, the correct answer is that IQ doesn't determine an inherent right to dignity, pseud.
>>25406510>strange fixation on human shitgee i wonder why
>>25406407>The reason you're hearing about it again is because in 2025 the rights were reacquired and the new publisher had a publicity stunt where they pretended Amazon was banning them for mega racism.I was told rightism was an organic counter culture and not a mirror image of the shitlib antiracist publishing and culture grift nexus with vice signaling in place of virtue signaling.
>>25411009Whataboutism is always low IQ cope>>25411029High IQ cope but still cope
>>25410847>My country's airport got blown up by "migrants"Damn. Skill issue. Maybe you should have tried assimilating them and not blaming millions of people for the actions of like 3 dudes as if citizens don't commit crimes too.Were those even culturally distinct "migrants" or was it like when Venezuelans bombed Colombia's airport?
>>25410982This is true in that people who are slightly above average (100-120~) but actual geniuses are rarely so easily propagandized.
>>25411035And Jewish IQ? Migration to Palestine was wonderful for its economy btw!
>>25411112Find a country where muslims have been assimilated without the use of policies lefties consider repressive.
>>25411015>bro thinks he's high IQ but accidentally put porn in the name field KEK!
>>25407061No wonder Iran is bombing Kuwait.
>>25411035>inherent right to dignityman this shit sucks ass you have more manipulation and realpolitik than any time in history just less physical violence and this is the card carrying call to why its justified
>>25411035>Blacks are worse off than they were before the 1960sThis coming from the same people who bitch endlessly about how everything is LITERALLY evil disgusting discrimination against whites kek
>>25411263>more manipulation and realpolitik than any time in historyNo, it's just more noticeable now because normies have access to social media and the MSM is thoroughly discredited. >less physical violenceBLM engaged in the largest mass riots in decades, a guy tried to assassinate SCOTUS justices as libtards staged protests meant to intimidate them outside of their homes, an armed mob was cheered on by Democrats during an insurrection (i.e. CHAZ in Seattle not the mostly peaceful protest on January 6th, lol), the current POTUS was shot in the head and this was followed by a second attempt on his life, the most important figure when it comes to the conservative youth movement was assassinated (Charlie Kirk), and we have retards blowing whistles/getting shot while trying to run over federal agents. There has been plenty of violence, anon. It's just memoryholed and under reported because it's coming from the libtard left.>why its justifiedIt's never justified. It's crazy amped up assholes destroying our ability to have nice things.
>>25411306DEI is active discrimination against whites, it's literally based on racial quotas, and blacks were more economically well off and less likely to be incarcerated before the lies of the Civil Rights Movement took hold. Also, they blacks who benefit from affirmative action aren't even the poor ones and even figures like Cornel West wrote that it doesn't work (he justified it in Race Matters by saying it has symbolic value and therefore criticism of it is criticism of the movement as a whole--talk about telling on yourself).
>>25411147The USA?
>>25411425Duuuude you should have assimilated them. It's YOUR fault the towers are down.But actually you're right. We SHOULD blame muslims for not condemning terrorism, especially so when it's revealed they were hiding the perpetrators in their own ethnic enclaves and lied to police about the whereabouts.
>>25411112This. Only the white man is evil. Muslim headchopping is a cultural practice and UNESCO heritage, chud.
>>25411425'member when the Muslim city council of Hamtramck, MI passed some ordinance to prohibit flying the fag flag on public property? That was le wholesome sandniggerino chungus 100.
>>25411590Remember when every other Muslim American didn’t? You focus on s tiny minority and claim it’s therefore all of them.
>>25411642>negative trends only exist when I can use them to force my beliefs, otherwise it's #NotAllMuslimsLol
>>25411642>Remember when every other Muslim American didn’t?How could other muslim Americans do so, if they aren't on city councils goober? How many Muslim majority city councils are there in America? Hamtramck was the first with 4/6 councillors being Muslims, and as far as I know it is still the only one. How odd that the first, and only, muslim majority city council thus far would do such a thing!So glad you leftist retards spent so much time fighting the "far-right" boogeymen and just welcomed the dune coons in with open arms and this is how they treat you.
>>25411347>Jim Crow was fine because they were better off>DEI is literally the same thing and it's completely unconscionable>Please now ignore how whites are better off than blacks today. That was relevant three seconds ago but it's not relevant anymore
>>25408477A retreat into the Bailey. (You) (modally speaking) take this book seriously.
>>25411767>>Jim Crow was fine because they were better offStrawman/goalpost shift.>>DEI is literally the same thing and it's completely unconscionableRacial quotas are bad, they impede merit, and such programs have led to a general decline in the quality of post secondary education.>>Please now ignore how whites are better off than blacks today. That was relevant three seconds ago but it's not relevant anymoreWhat? Lol.You're really dumb. Go watch some leftoid debatebro videos.
>>25411748> So glad you leftist retards spent so much time fighting the "far-right" boogeymen and just welcomed the dune coons in with open arms and this is how they treat you.You are on the right track but you still aren’t there. In reality, the left is more or less dead. It doesn’t matter. The world is comprised of various right wing factions battling it out to come on top. In Europe, politics is a conflict between the nativist right and the Islamist right. The “left” is best understood as non-Muslim supporters of the Islamist camp. They aren’t being fooled into supporting Muslims, that is the express purpose of their movement.
>>25411846>delusions of persecution Lol
Water poisoning is a thing. You can drink too much water. Too much of anything is a poison/“poison”. Why do people think immigration is exempt from this rule? That there is no such thing as people poisoning?
>>25411098I don't even understand your schizo gobblygoop nor do I care to.
>>25411878>delusions of persecutionPray tell what happens to minorities in muslim countries?
>>25412774They run businesses, work jobs, lead lives as normal as everyone else and OH - get bombed by Western countries from time to time.
about two years ago i discovered that sweden has a mass immigration policy because in the 1960s a jewish journalist called david schwarz published a series of articles in the newspapers owned by jews like the bonnier family which discussed the need for more immigrants and less restrictions imposed upon themafaik the breakthrough article was called "the foreigner problem in sweden" published by dagens nyheter in 1964, which sparked a national debate calling for relaxed assimilation rules for non-european immigrants for reasons such as, and i quote, "a need for different cultural groups” and “give our life new content" give it a read for yourself and prepare to dip your toes into the obfuscated history of the origins of current social issues!https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/09/23/the-origins-of-swedish-multiculturalism/
>>25412812Even if any of that were true they would deserve to be bombed because they're tacitly condoning evil by living with it.
>>25412825>wahhh muslims are evilwhen's the last time muslims bombed another country?
>>25412812What are you even on about lmao, Hindus in Pakistan lead hellish lives
>>25412841So we're just pretending Iran isn't Muslim suddenly?
>>25412841literally yesterday when iran bombed its neighbour, you moron
>>25411443>The 9/11 hijackers were immigrantsJesus fucking Christ
>>25406407What a narrative. /lit/ and online rightoids has been spamming about this book for a decade at least. If there was a recent publicity stunt, it's irrelevant to the book's infamy. I know this not from a tweet, a soundbyte or a wiki page, but from actually seeing it.
>>25412854>ignoring the other half of the postAllah fucking Pedohammad
>>25411443>still bitching about a single crime that happened over 2 decades agoMuslims must have assimilated or you wouldn't be doing this many backflips to pick a cherry.
>>25412857The entire post was fucking stupid. I'm not here to respond to every one of your hallucinations.
>>25412855A youtuber did a video on it recently which is why there's attention right now.
>>25412864Thanks for bowing out so early, I guess. >>25412859Always a pleasure to see this kind of wilful dismissal on an anonymous image board.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacks
>>25412841>In the West:2025: ISIS bomber attacked New Orleans, Muslim shooters attack a beach in Australia>South AsiaPahalgam attacks in Kashmir, lynching and murders of Hindus in Bangladesh>In AfricaNigeria has seen major attacks by Boko Haram, ISIS, JNIM, all through the year and last year. They target Christians and the secular government.I will exclude Muslim-on-Muslim violence, and the Iran war because that’s a war between nation-states and the religious aspects are secondary. The fact is that Muslims do not tolerate non-Muslims.
>>25412854Where did Sayyid Qutb travel to shortly before laying the foundation of Islamism and where did those that carried out the attacks learn to fly planes?
>>25412892Honestly, does it matter? These attacks wouldn’t happen with a healthy security and intelligence agency. We don’t see these things in North African countries which have more muslims than all the euro capitals combined.
>>25412879>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Islamist_terrorist_attacksSure are a lot of Americans attacking Americans and foreigners attacking foreigners in this supposed list of Muslim immigrant crimes against Americans.
>>25413006I’m not American, dipshit.>foreigners (muslims) attacking foreigners (muslims)Then I guess integration isn’t the issue huh
>>25412992>We don’t see these things in North African countries which have more muslims than all the euro capitals combined.that's because those north africans are committing those attacks in those euro capitalseven the moroccan prime minister recently said publicly that europe has taken in all of morocco's criminals
>>25412992>Honestly, does it matter?Yes and that's why you can't answer the question.
>>25412992because muslim countries tend to PUNISH criminals. rEUtard liberal faggots think punishing crime is racist.
>>25413038>I’m not American, dipshit.Never would have guessed. Follow the discussion.>Then I guess integration isn’t the issue huhNeither is immigration it seems, so you seem to be barking up the wrong stagecoach. Problem seems to be right-wingers, especially religious fundamentalists. Fuck Islamists. Fuck Zionists. Fuck Christian Nationalists.
>>25413098Interesting that there’s no communism on the list. Is it because you think communism doesn't have literal churches or mosques and is therefore morally superior despite having caused more bloodshed in the 20th century than any of the things you named?Funny how sticking it to the numerous factions adherent to their culture or religion worked out for the USSR, lol. Or how allowing Jews to migrate to Palestine ended up a little noisy. Migration was le good, right? How come these Palestinians didn't see that? Why didn't they integrate them into their society properly? In the unlikely instance you're not a commie, what do you believe is the correct approach to immigration besides letting in hordes of nonwhites that drive down wages? How do I, a white man whose ancestors toiled on this soil since before it earned its name and modern demarcations, benefit from allowing in people who do worse in every aspect a healthy society is measured by? (You're free to contest the premise of this question, though I highly doubt you will.)
the entire internet today is just seeing leftists get their worldview repeatedly curb stomped ad infinitum
>>25412855Yes, and they've always been wrong about it. As i said in the post, it didn't sell well at first printing and the English TL was licensed by a group the estate didn't care for so they yanked the rights 20 years ago. It just became much bigger in the last year due to the new rights holders.There's a phenomenon in video games where an untranslated or hard-to-locate game gets a hugely inflated reputation, only for it to collapse on the littlest bit of actual scrutiny. That's Le Camp des Saints. It's CROSS†CHANNEL for rightoids.
>>25413373>t. believes these are "bandeder"
>>25412855https://youtu.be/ImZKh3SqSmoThat you? Lol
>>25413435no those aren't banned either. what is even your point right now?Le Camp des Saints has been available for free in the Internet Archive since 2011. It was unavailable in bookstores not because it was banned for being too epic, but because the rights holder - the Raspail estate - was uninterested in licensing the English TL. The French version has been available even on American websites, including Amazon, since the early 2000s.It's only been hard to acquire because it's a sought after item by some groups and its always had a low supply. That's all. Now as of 2025 the supply issue is no longer a problem. Congrats! Enjoy the fairly mundane book about a French guy hating himself and his country - truly a rare subject not explored by anyone else.
>>25413435>The Sun Also Rises>As I Lay Dying>Maus>East of Eden>Grapes of Wrath>Of Mice and Menthis ain't serious is it?and then there's:>MATILDAand>THE OUTSIDERSWhen and where the fuck were these ever banned?
>>25406416Based.
>>25410598You didn't see the yogurt commercial?
>>25413148>Is it because you think communism doesn't have literal churches or mosques and is therefore morally superior despite having caused more bloodshed in the 20th century than any of the things you named?Unironically yes.
>>25413563Too bad commies get outflanked by religitards every time then lol.
>>25413469>spergIt's has been historically more difficult to obtain, it arguably still is as most libraries don't stock it, and has created far more seethe on your end of the political spectrum than all of the books in pic-related (>>25413435) combined (have any of those ever even been out of print? lol).Stop being such a gaslighting queer and go live life on the wild side by reading The Handmaid's Tale or, better yet, watching the multimillion dollar Emmy/Golden Globe/Peabody (Entertainment, children's and youth honoree) Award winning television series based on it. You can also watch the the 1990 film version if you want. Wow, so heckin' banned!
>>25413526If you're talking about the Chobani commercial, I have yes. I've also seen the political banners/cartoons that the German Greens made. But it seems that low IQ lefties can't create any literature that portray utopias embodying their ideals, only gay cartoons.
>>25413580you've built your entire personality over something that's very silly. you should be more robust than this.
>>25413595>non sequitur I accept your concession.
>>25413590The>utopias embodying their ideals, ARE>only gay cartoons.
>>25413622
>>25413474A random school in the middle of nowhere will have a meeting where some random parent said something like "why are kids reading this and not that" (the audacity of them caring about their children's education!!) so the libtard/leftoid coalition presents it as a grand cause célèbre and eventually a marketing gimmick. It's kind of crazy how much political mileage they get out of making dimwitted teens maintain the cognitive dissonance that they're part of an oppressed class while attending university, lol.
>>25413633>eventually a marketing gimmick.alrighty I'm dumb because I never thought of this.I still want to know who's banning Matilda and The Outsiders though.
>>25413590Libtards wrote this and it sounds absolutely terrible:>The Ministry for the Future is a climate fiction novel by American science fiction writer Kim Stanley Robinson, published in 2020. Set in the near future, the novel follows a subsidiary body, established under the Paris Agreement, whose mission is to act as an advocate for the world's future generations of citizens as if their rights were as valid as the present generation's. While the ministry pursues various ambitious projects, the effects of climate change are determined to be the most consequential. The plot primarily follows Mary Murphy, the head of the titular Ministry for the Future, and Frank May, an American aid worker traumatized by experiencing a deadly heat wave in India. >The book follows an international organization named the Ministry for the Future in its mission to act as an advocate for the world's future generations of citizens as if their rights were as valid as the present generation's. Beginning in 2025, the organization, established as a subsidiary body under the Paris Agreement and based in Zurich, is led by protagonist Mary Murphy, a former foreign minister of Ireland and a composite character based on diplomats Mary Robinson, Christiana Figueres, and Laurence Tubiana.[2] Climate change is established as a threat that compromises the safety and prosperity of the future. While the narrative includes chapters of nonfiction history and descriptions of events from the perspectives of other characters and objects, the plot follows Murphy as she seeks to convince central banks of the threats to currency and market stability posed by the effects of climate change. Specifically, a coordinated global round of unconventional quantitative easing through the issuance of a complementary currency, called the carbon coin, to be issued in proportion to the mass of carbon that is mitigated. The monetary concept, called carbon quantitative easing, is based on a specific real-life policy proposal, called a Global Carbon Reward, and an academic paper referred to throughout the book as the "Chen Paper".[3] In Antarctica, various countries cooperate in a geoengineering project to drill to the bottom of glaciers and pump meltwater up to slow basal sliding while the program incentivizes multiple other simultaneous efforts like carbon farming, sail-driven container ships for cargo and airships for personal transport.Noted Marxist Fredric Jameson was one of the author's thesis advisors, lol.
>>25413654>the plot follows Murphy as she seeks to convince central banks of the threats to currency and market stability posed by the effects of climate change.>the issuance of a complementary currency, called the carbon coin, to be issued in proportion to the mass of carbon that is mitigated.unreal
>>25413654The sheer delusion within this book was something to witness. The premise is that India, of all nations, unites around the threat of climate change and becomes a world leader in geoengineering and radical environmental action. Other smaller delusional dreams also pop up, like a liberal revolution in Saudi Arabia.
>>25413654>future generations of citizens>citizensJesus Christ Ted was right
>>25411841>strawman goalpost!You have to go back>racial quotas are badObviously, but if you seriously think that blacks were better off prior to the 60s you’re genuinely fucking retarded lmfao>universities are worse nowOkay?>Wut? Lol Yeah, I guess it’s not surprising you couldn’t follow
>>25413580Why are you so invested in and defensive of this persecution narrative? Regardless of whether or not it’s true, the suggestion that it could be false seems to really get to you
>>25413148>Interesting that there’s no communism on the listCommunism isn't exactly a major driver of violent crime/terrorism in good old 2026 CE. Generally the evils associated with it can be prevented by simply not empowering people that think science is fake or that large portions of the population need to be purged. Capitalists seem to have taken up those causes anyway.If the reincarnation for Stalin or Mao starts running for office, I'll be sure to not vote for them.>Or how allowing Jews to migrate to Palestine ended up a little noisy. Migration was le good, right? How come these Palestinians didn't see that? Why didn't they integrate them into their society properly?Ah yes, cause there were no integrated Jews in modern day Israel and Palestine prior to the Zionist project. Clearly the problem there is that Jews and Muslims cannot coexist and not that a colonialist political project was enacted through foreign powers and military action. Feel free to kill colonists, bro. Those aren't the same thing as immigrants.>In the unlikely instance you're not a commie, what do you believe is the correct approach to immigration besides letting in hordes of nonwhites that drive down wages? How do I, a white man whose ancestors toiled on this soil since before it earned its name and modern demarcations, benefit from allowing in people who do worse in every aspect a healthy society is measured by?You're European. Unless you're fucking Swiss, your land didn't earn its modern demarcations before the last fucking century. And I'd be shocked if you have no immigrant blood in you going back twice that, you uneducated fuckwit.
>>25414659Haha all this to deny you’re a loathsome commie. Just own up to it, lol. Wanna bet I bench higher than you?
>>25414659>And I'd be shocked if you have no immigrant blood in you going back twice that, you uneducated fuckwit.are you lost lil bro
>>25413654This is so funnyThis kind of liberal therapy media is everywhere now, it's so culturally stifling
>>25406330I got almost twenty chapters in before dropping it. I agree with the book's argument and there are some interesting themes raised, but the story and prose are nothing to write home about. But you're right, it's not really all that racist, which makes sense as Raspail's other books are quite sympathetic to nonwhite cultures.
>>25414234>Why are you so invested in and defensive of this persecution narrative?I'm not. >Regardless of whether or not it’s true, the suggestion that it could be false seems to really get to youProjection, anon. I'm making fun of you.
>>25406342Who this disgusting whore think she is to ban a book?
>>25414673Cool counterargument, bro.>Haha all this to deny you’re a loathsome commieNone of that was to deny I'm a commie. If I were denying I'm a commie, I'd just say I'm not a commie. I am not a commie. See? Dumbass.>Wanna bet I bench higher than you?Truly, you are an ubermensch. How can my immigration takes even compete with such muscles.>>25414676Are you? My entire family are hobbyist genealogists so I can say with some authority and experience that anyone that thinks they're some ethnic pureblood is fucking delusional. People god damn moving isn't some new fucking phenomenon. My great great great great great great great great grandpa lived in 4 fucking countries over the course of his life and he wasn't even ethnically native to any of them.
>>25414659>not empowering people that think science is fake or that large portions of the population need to be purgedYou literally just said that people who are skeptical in a way you disagree with should be purged you cognitively dissonant moron. >If the reincarnation for Stalin or Mao starts running for office, I'll be sure to not vote for them.Only because you wouldn't have the opportunity to vote, retard. Holy shit you're stupid.
>>25415324>My great great great great great great great great grandpa lived in 4 fucking countries over the course of his lifeNation states didn't exist back then and, if true, you're describing an extreme outlier from a time when people lived and died within 15 miles of where they were born.
>>25415324> My entire family are hobbyist genealogists so I can say with some authority and experience that anyone that thinks they're some ethnic pureblood is fucking delusionalHahaha this has to be b8.
>>25415324You >>25414659 didn't anwer my original post (>>25413148)I asked questions that I was interested in finding your answer to and you instead ignored them. Can you tell me why? >Are you? My entire family are hobbyist genealogists so I can say with some authority and experience that anyone that thinks they're some ethnic pureblood is fucking delusional. People god damn moving isn't some new fucking phenomenon. My great great great great great great great great grandpa lived in 4 fucking countries over the course of his life and he wasn't even ethnically native to any of them.I was initially going to open by calling you a sheltered STEM grad, but given your appeal to kinship as a credential I doubt you have any degree at all. Here's mine though: 6 years of medical school. You can try to backpedal by telling me that's not a relevant credential but my family has scientists and I'm not the one claiming it boosts my stats like in Yu Gi Oh. >And I'd be shocked if you have no immigrant blood in you going back twice that, you uneducated fuckwit.Define "immigrant" so we don't play word games where you lump feral macheteniggers in the same category as the ethnic groups bordering my European country and then we can talk seriously. >Ah yes, cause there were no integrated Jews in modern day Israel and Palestine prior to the Zionist project. Clearly the problem there is that Jews and Muslims cannot coexist and not that a colonialist political project was enacted through foreign powers and military action. Feel free to kill colonists, bro. Those aren't the same thing as immigrants.Who is to say that the hundreds of thousands of Jews coming from all across the globe were colonists? How did they deserve that appellation?>colonialist political project was enacted through foreign powers and military actionThe US and other foreign parties facilitated much of the migration that occurred in the EU after WW2. I don't get why you're making cause with me now, you're supposed to say this is completely beneficial to my country or something lol.
>>25415628Incredibly based post. >You can try to backpedal by telling me that's not a relevant credential but my family has scientists and I'm not the one claiming it boosts my stats like in Yu Gi Oh.Kek.
>>25414231>strawman goalpost!It was, retard. I'm not arguing for Jim Crow. I'm pointing out you're completely ignorant that the Civil Rights Movement had negative repercussions. >ObviouslyThat's what DEI is you fucking retard. >if you seriously think that blacks were better off prior to the 60sIn certain ways they were and I posted an example, the decline of the black family unit, in my original post. Also, socioeconomic gains within the black community were already on an upward trend prior to the 1960s when the civil rights movement took place. >Yeah, I guess it’s not surprising you couldn’t followIt was a non sequitur, fucktard. I'm not arguing that blacks are better off than whites.
