Is he just a schizo?
>>25410227He denies the entirety of the FSSPX as completeoy evil even tho he calls everything else controlled by the Jews and the FSSPX being the only organisation that is completely uninfluenced by this "Jewish Subversion".Recommend watching this debate he had against Michael Davis where he (Jones) lost and still seethes to this day:https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLc1nFsC-jDoDCXLAud2vY_4ua8DAjzJ09
>>25410227I don't understand how he can write about such topics and still ultimately be a "one race the human race no human is illegal :(" shitlib.
>>25410249This and a thousand times this. EMJ's sole purpose is to play idiot when it comes to the Jewish infiltration and destruction of his church. It's fine because his audience is mainly illiterate young retards or dementia affected grandpas who forgot that EMJ contradicted himself twice since by the end of his show. Jews have infiltrated and undermined most institutions except muuuh church.This is why no Catholic "trad" or modernist wants to talk to this codger.
>>25410227he's just an inflexible old man who cannot think outside a very narrow paradigm. reminds me of my father. the slaughter of american cities is pretty good. everything else is frankly garbage because he's in over his head, can kind of sense it, but doubles down anyway due to boomer pride and makes a fool of himself.
>>25410227he should mud wrestle with jay dyer
way ahead of his time but most can't into his work because of muh boomer, immediately writing him off
>>25410227nah not really. i haven't read slaughter of cities but it's sitting on my shelf and i want to delve into it soon. its premise about catholics being cleansed by the protestant establishment with blacks isn't far off at all--literally every ghetto in the u.s. used to be a catholic neighborhood whose inhabitants have been fully deracinated. however he is a very out of touch boomer who doesn't like to engage with any challenge to his views. for example there's this discussion of the book i mentioned with jim goad, who argues that the cleansing was less religious and more ethnic, and jones just shrugs it off despite some very compelling evidence. here's the vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg4jVptrHKMhis talk on degenerate moderns is a good intro to his work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTjEeg6AmCw
>>25410227Did you know that before the internet he was known as just Michael Jones?
>>25413668how well known is he, really? i hear him in a lot of dissident right circles and have delved into his stuff from there but don't hear about him much outside of that.i enjoy his takes on history and the jq but it's the catholicism i can't stand. all i'll say is it says something that every ex christian i know who is vehemently against religion is catholic. pretty major defect
I give him credit for trying but ultimate he's a facile thinker and his answers are unsatisfactory. He'll say 'weaponized' migration is bad, but what makes it 'weaponized' and how does he justify stopping it? Why shouldn't we allowed millions of Catholic, English speaking browns in through the border, exactly? Because that is what Catholic charities are doing right now, although he will handwave it away as the fault of 'the jews' which it isn't, the vast majority of it being done by christians and liberals.He wants to appeal to based redpill types with christians half answers. He isn't based enough to actually address the issues satisfactorily while running everything through acceptance by Rome
He's a rigid traditionalist, not schizo
>>25411845kek, very funny post
>>25413714Christianity doesn't really have "half-answers," it just has answers some people don't like.
>>25413819You have to apply those principles to modern situations in specific waysCatholicism in particular excels at vague generalities like "you need to treat people with dignity."What exactly does that mean in the context of the immigration situation? Can we deport people? Can we close the border? What due process do they get? etc etc
EMJ and his writers/employees want to promote race mixing. On Culture wars they had an article that was supposed to btfo of Fuentes' world view. They talked shit about him but there was no coherent critique.He needs an editor as his books aren't as well made as they used to be.
>those soundboard prank calls videos of E. Micheal jones trying to talk about sex to grandmas are goneLike tears in rain
>>25410227You can't be a dedicated Christian without being a little bit schizophrenic.
>>25410227any real Christian who cares about morals and monotheism becomes a Muslim and follows the Quran and Sunnah
