[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
Is this the best cooking scien(...) No.25423034
File: IMG_3422.jpg (40 KB, 376x531)
40 KB JPG
Is this the best cooking science book?  No.25423034 Archived
>>
Anonymous
 No.25423047
 No.25423047
>>25423034
yes. If you want something less rigorous, try the Food Lab.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25423050
 No.25423050
I find they are mostly pop sci and pseudoscience. Very nitpicky about what they choose to believe. Felt like reading a self-help book.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25423233
 No.25423233
>>25423050
On Food and Cooking is written and was researched like a textbook. Don't call it pop sci.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25423247
 No.25423247
>>25423047
Looks good and a little less dense as In Food.
>>
Anonymous
 No.25425072
 No.25425072
>>25423050
I read "Buttons of Napoleon," and there were a bunch of historical errors.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.