>get told to read the right wing esoterics>serrano, evola, blavatsky, etc>it's actual tranny shit where they worship androgyny >blavatsky wrote the 6-7th root races would return to androgyny which is the 3rd gender plato wrote aboutIs this meant to be some sort of a joke?
modern-day transness is the counter-initiatic inversion of traditional androgyny
>>25426485yes, she was an absolute hack and a grifter, convoluted bunch of ancient ideas and fooled precursors to new age bullshit to buy her shit
>>25426492And what about Miguel Serrano and that entire chapter in nos book of the resurrection? And Evola believing the fall of mankind was the fall from androgyny into binary gender, and that being one of the reasons for suffering?
>takes it literallydumb ass hylic
>>25426502>it isn't literalSo you have not read the metaphysics of sex. I am guessing you only read ride the tiger.
>>25426502pbuh. fichte speaks of the hylic problem as well.
>>25426498hermaphrodite is symbolic of the divine union of opposites, the reconciliation of male and female energies, and a state of spiritual wholeness. not about dudes with tits.
>>25426512>evola has an entire chapter titled "The Degrees of Sexual Development, Physical Sex and Inner Sex>he explicitly states that physical processes, including hormones, influence thought You do not possess secret knowledge. You have not read Evola.
There is literaly nothing wrong with trannies or third gender ideas. (((They))) want you to stay in your little goy-box. I say this as a gigachud.
Anyone claiming that Evola is symbolic is LARPing you haven't read it. He explicitly separates his metaphysical and his physical ideas.Hylics calling everyone is hylics.
>>25426544shalom Rabbi any shoah lately?
this frightens the chud
>>25426485It's mental illness. >>25426518>n-no it's acktuallyIt's girls with dicks. And you're stupid for falling for it. Feel free to keep coping.
>if you believe in androgynous deities then you want to cut your dick off
>>25426485read
6 7 ????
>>25426485Blavatsky isn't the same person as Evola and Serrano, who are each quite different from each other, and have widely varying ideologies with different bases. I think some online grifters were putting out info about reading Blavatsky, but to my knowledge she is not taken seriously, and very rarely if ever mentioned on /lit/ except in reference to her having existed.
>>25426886And yet the Theosophical Society retains centers with many active members worldwide, while Evola and Serrano are of importance only to teenage chuds online.
>>25426485The elites used her as a pawn to eventually usher in globalism
>>25426897The Mahatmas?
>>25426485the what root races?
>>25426485>Is this meant to be some sort of a joke?He didn't start with the Greeks.
>>25426899She was sponsored by Lord Milner and Lord Rothschild. She was friends with Fabian socialist Mahatma Gandhi and secret agent 666 Aleister Crowley. She promited interracial relationships perennialism and yoga
>>25426547Evola has wrote a book about Tantric yoga. Sex magic. That's tradcels reference for you.
>>25426773Guenon also wrote of androgyny hes part of this clique too.
>>25427292Gandhi was on king shit. He endorsed the beliefs of Savitri Devi, who also pointed out to him that none of his followers even practice what he preaches, and he conceded that to her. And now you tell me he was friends with Blavatsky?Gandhi is based there's no other read.
>>25426485Left wingers want a complex ideology in their theory that seems rigorous and watertight, so that it can be used to change society from their ivory tower office without any regard to how little it corresponds to reality.Right wingers are looking at the world as it really is and living lives and working jobs that generally root them to reality, and therefore want something a little looser and more intuitive when it comes to theory.No one who come round to reading Evola is any doubt about the realities of blood, war, sweat and soil, etc., so when there's a passage about Uranian spirit or whatever, it doesn't diminish what can be used and enjoyed by the naturally pragmatic man.
>>25428422I like his writing and his style but you must concede that he was suicidal. The right talks about suicidal empathy but here is Evola walking around while artillery is raining down around him and he almost died from it. He chose to do that himself when there was a safer alternative.
>>25426916lol
>>25428422>>25428460To add to this.After he was injured because he decided to just walk around during shelling he was in a wheelchair his entire life. He could not work like you consider the right works. From that day on he was only ever an author. So he made the decision to do something, became disabled, then he became a professional writer.That doesn't seem very right-wing. It really comes off like a leftist. You know Marx never having a real job and all that. How do you reconcile this?
>>25428403He probably spied for British intelligence as well
>>25428466Evola became disabled over a decade after writing Revolt. You're an idiot.
>>25428466>That doesn't seem very right-wing. It really comes off like a leftist. You know Marx never having a real job and all that. How do you reconcile this?Actually Marx had a real job. Editor in chief of the Neue Reinische Zeitung, before autorities closed the Zeitung.
And after this, Marx wrote hundreds of articles for the new york daily tribune, from which he received payment.
>>25426485what was it that convinced you that "right wing esoterics" was a worthwhile thing to read? is there a specific post you remember?
>>25426485You're mixing up esoterc ideals of sex and gender vs trannismTrannism literally screech 'I am a womyn, hear me roar'Esoteric values hold the belief that knowledge should be explored. A man is not a woman. We know this. But a man can try to understand a woman's understanding by engaging in her cultureNot that fucking hardOne is mental illness and the other is essentially getting drugged out of your mind to experiment what certain experiences feel like
>>25426485esotericism just means transit's a rejection of physicality of course it would be trans. Any authentic right wing thing would necessarily be particular to one sort of people and not interested in any sort of human wide or ahistorical (in the sense of their own history) spiritualityYes the retards who obsess over indians are trans because they are all rejecting their actual inheritance
