[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


This is some medieval /lit/ KINO of highest order.
Reddit niggas pretend that the book makes mistakes in it's depiction of history as if they are not intentional. The monk nigga that wrote it just wanted everyone to go on crusade. Fucking normans fight under Charlemagne kek.
He also supports the pope in investiture controversy or at least hated Holy Roman Emperors, that's why he focuses on that Charlemagne nigga.
The geography and muslim niggas in the book are also funny af. There are dark niggas and niggas who are hairy like monkeys.
>>
>>25426909
This is paired well with The Two Lives of Charlemagne if you're already in the mood for medieval history/propaganda
>>
>>25426909
Good book! Read the Laid of Marie de France if you want more of this but everything is an allegory.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.