Is it a good resource?
>>25459138its alright. could have better ui and cover more topics but it is what it is
professors at my uni recommend it, and when I look up something I already know a decent amount about, it seems pretty accurate in informative.
>>25459138Debunked by AIhttps://x.com/PhilWMagness/status/2086884147448992083
It's okay as an overview/introduction as long as you don't treat it too seriously. IEP is better per article but the same applies to it too.
>>25460468Did he post the SEP ngram yet in order to debunk the entire project?
>>25459138Is that logo a dude on the toilet?
>>25459138Test.
>>25459138I emailed a correction to one of their articles once and I saved the thank you email.